中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2013年
19期
2313-2316
,共4页
刘莉燕%石贞仙%吴晓娟%杜巧%杨琴%张晶%王海芳
劉莉燕%石貞仙%吳曉娟%杜巧%楊琴%張晶%王海芳
류리연%석정선%오효연%두교%양금%장정%왕해방
护理操作技术%难度系数%量化管理
護理操作技術%難度繫數%量化管理
호리조작기술%난도계수%양화관리
Nursing operation technique%Difficulty coefficient%Quantitative management
目的 初步探索临床实用、量化的护理操作技术难度系数,进一步完善临床护理工作量化管理评价体系.方法 以5所三级甲等综合性医院和1所三级甲等专科性医院90名护理专家或骨干为咨询对象,以“护理操作技术难度评价指标体系”为研究工具,对27项基础护理项目、12项专科护理项目进行难度评价.结果 发放调查问卷90份,回收82份,剔除无效问卷8份,有效回收率91.1%.39项临床护理操作技术的难度系数专家咨询结果在0.67 ~1.98.综合医院与专科医院护理专家或骨干对27项基础护理操作项目评分分别为(1.21±0.22),(1.22 ±0.19)分,差异无统计学意义(t=0.495,P>0.05);对12项专科护理操作项目评分分别为(3.4±0.38),(2.9±0.31)分,差异有统计学意义(t=5.169,P<0.05).结论 “临床护理操作技术难度评价指标体系”可系统、全面地评价临床护理操作项目技术难度;27项基础护理项目难度系数表在不同医院具有可推广性;本研究方法为其他医院制定专科护理操作技术难度提供参考.
目的 初步探索臨床實用、量化的護理操作技術難度繫數,進一步完善臨床護理工作量化管理評價體繫.方法 以5所三級甲等綜閤性醫院和1所三級甲等專科性醫院90名護理專傢或骨榦為咨詢對象,以“護理操作技術難度評價指標體繫”為研究工具,對27項基礎護理項目、12項專科護理項目進行難度評價.結果 髮放調查問捲90份,迴收82份,剔除無效問捲8份,有效迴收率91.1%.39項臨床護理操作技術的難度繫數專傢咨詢結果在0.67 ~1.98.綜閤醫院與專科醫院護理專傢或骨榦對27項基礎護理操作項目評分分彆為(1.21±0.22),(1.22 ±0.19)分,差異無統計學意義(t=0.495,P>0.05);對12項專科護理操作項目評分分彆為(3.4±0.38),(2.9±0.31)分,差異有統計學意義(t=5.169,P<0.05).結論 “臨床護理操作技術難度評價指標體繫”可繫統、全麵地評價臨床護理操作項目技術難度;27項基礎護理項目難度繫數錶在不同醫院具有可推廣性;本研究方法為其他醫院製定專科護理操作技術難度提供參攷.
목적 초보탐색림상실용、양화적호리조작기술난도계수,진일보완선림상호리공작양화관리평개체계.방법 이5소삼급갑등종합성의원화1소삼급갑등전과성의원90명호리전가혹골간위자순대상,이“호리조작기술난도평개지표체계”위연구공구,대27항기출호리항목、12항전과호리항목진행난도평개.결과 발방조사문권90빈,회수82빈,척제무효문권8빈,유효회수솔91.1%.39항림상호리조작기술적난도계수전가자순결과재0.67 ~1.98.종합의원여전과의원호리전가혹골간대27항기출호리조작항목평분분별위(1.21±0.22),(1.22 ±0.19)분,차이무통계학의의(t=0.495,P>0.05);대12항전과호리조작항목평분분별위(3.4±0.38),(2.9±0.31)분,차이유통계학의의(t=5.169,P<0.05).결론 “림상호리조작기술난도평개지표체계”가계통、전면지평개림상호리조작항목기술난도;27항기출호리항목난도계수표재불동의원구유가추엄성;본연구방법위기타의원제정전과호리조작기술난도제공삼고.
Objective To explore a practical,measurable difficulty coefficient table of clinical nursing operation techniques,so as to perfect the evaluation system of clinical nursing work quantitative management.Methods Totals of 90 clinical nursing specialists from five three level of first-class comprehensive hospitals and one three level of first-class specialized subject hospital were investigates by questionaire of "the evaluation index system for assessing the difficulty of clinical nursing operation techniques" on 27 basic clinical nursing operation projects and 12 college clinical nursing operation projects.Results Eighty-two questionnaires were taken back,excluding invalid questionnaire eight copies,with 91.1% of effective recovery rate.The difficulty coefficient of 39 clinical nursing operation techniques ranged between 0.67 and 1.98.Rating on the 27 items of basic nursing projects by nursing experts or backbone from different hospitals had no significant different scores [(1.21 ± 0.22) vs (1.22 ±0.19) ;t =0.495,P >0.05],while significant difference was found in 12 items of special nursing projects [(3.4±0.38) vs (2.9±0.31);t=5.169,P<0.05].Conclusions "The evaluation index system for assessing the difficulty of clinical nursing operation techniques" can evaluate the difficulty of clinical nursing operation techniques systematically and comprehensively.The difficulty coefficient table of 27 items of basic clinical nursing operation techniques can be extended in different nature hospitals.It can be referred to explore the difficulty of college clinical nursing operation techniques.