中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2013年
25期
3053-3055
,共3页
周玉梅%唐小伟%彭爱琴%包美华
週玉梅%唐小偉%彭愛琴%包美華
주옥매%당소위%팽애금%포미화
精神分裂症%综合护理干预%病耻感%社会功能
精神分裂癥%綜閤護理榦預%病恥感%社會功能
정신분렬증%종합호리간예%병치감%사회공능
Schizophrenia%Comprehensive nursing intervention%Stigma%Social function
目的 探讨综合护理干预对康复期精神分裂症患者病耻感及社会功能的作用.方法 选取60例康复期精神分裂症患者按随机数字表法随机分为干预组和对照组各30例,对照组予精神科常规护理,干预组予12周的综合护理干预,两组在治疗前后分别予病耻感评估量表及护士用住院病人观察量表(NOSIE)评定,并比较两组结果.结果 干预前两组患者病耻感得分及NOSIE量表各因子评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);经过12周的综合护理干预,干预组病耻感得分(25.52±10.33)分,NOSIE量表中社会功能(21.85±4.46)分、社会兴趣(11.02±3.06)分、个人整洁(15.35±2.29)分、抑郁(3.03±1.44)分,与干预前[(38.10±15.50),(18.46 ±5.65),(7.78±3.14),(12.15±3.30),(3.76±1.37)分]及对照组[(32.26±12.15),(18.89±3.36),(9.34±1.98),(11.57±3.02),(4.20±1.53)分]比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组病耻感得分与干预前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 综合护理干预能降低精神分裂症患者的病耻感,改善患者的社会功能,提高其生活质量.
目的 探討綜閤護理榦預對康複期精神分裂癥患者病恥感及社會功能的作用.方法 選取60例康複期精神分裂癥患者按隨機數字錶法隨機分為榦預組和對照組各30例,對照組予精神科常規護理,榦預組予12週的綜閤護理榦預,兩組在治療前後分彆予病恥感評估量錶及護士用住院病人觀察量錶(NOSIE)評定,併比較兩組結果.結果 榦預前兩組患者病恥感得分及NOSIE量錶各因子評分比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);經過12週的綜閤護理榦預,榦預組病恥感得分(25.52±10.33)分,NOSIE量錶中社會功能(21.85±4.46)分、社會興趣(11.02±3.06)分、箇人整潔(15.35±2.29)分、抑鬱(3.03±1.44)分,與榦預前[(38.10±15.50),(18.46 ±5.65),(7.78±3.14),(12.15±3.30),(3.76±1.37)分]及對照組[(32.26±12.15),(18.89±3.36),(9.34±1.98),(11.57±3.02),(4.20±1.53)分]比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);對照組病恥感得分與榦預前比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 綜閤護理榦預能降低精神分裂癥患者的病恥感,改善患者的社會功能,提高其生活質量.
목적 탐토종합호리간예대강복기정신분렬증환자병치감급사회공능적작용.방법 선취60례강복기정신분렬증환자안수궤수자표법수궤분위간예조화대조조각30례,대조조여정신과상규호리,간예조여12주적종합호리간예,량조재치료전후분별여병치감평고량표급호사용주원병인관찰량표(NOSIE)평정,병비교량조결과.결과 간예전량조환자병치감득분급NOSIE량표각인자평분비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05);경과12주적종합호리간예,간예조병치감득분(25.52±10.33)분,NOSIE량표중사회공능(21.85±4.46)분、사회흥취(11.02±3.06)분、개인정길(15.35±2.29)분、억욱(3.03±1.44)분,여간예전[(38.10±15.50),(18.46 ±5.65),(7.78±3.14),(12.15±3.30),(3.76±1.37)분]급대조조[(32.26±12.15),(18.89±3.36),(9.34±1.98),(11.57±3.02),(4.20±1.53)분]비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);대조조병치감득분여간예전비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 종합호리간예능강저정신분렬증환자적병치감,개선환자적사회공능,제고기생활질량.
Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the stigma and social function of convalescence patients with schizophrenia.Methods 60 patients with schizophrenia were randomly divided into theinerventiongroup and the control group,each with 30 cases.The control group received conventional psychiatric nursing while the intervention group received comprehensive nursing intervention for 12 weeks.Stigma scale and NOSIE were used for evaluation and comparison between two groups before and after treatment.Results There was no statistically significant difference in stigma scale and NOSIE between two groups before intervention (P > 0.05).The score of stigma scale and social function,social interest,personal cleanliness,depression in NOSIE was respectively (25.52 ± 10.33),(21.85 ± 4.46),(11.02 ± 3.06),(15.35 ± 2.29) and (3.03 ± 1.44) in the intervention group after 12 weeks of comprehensive nursing intervention,(38.10 ± 15.50),(18.46 ± 5.65),(7.78 ± 3.14),(12.15 ± 3.30)and (3.76 ± 1.37) in the control group,and (32.26 ± 12.15),(18.89 ±3.36),(9.34 ± 1.98),(11.57 ± 3.02) and (4.20 ± 1.53) before intervention,and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Score of stigma in the control group had no statistically significant differences before and after intervention (P > 0.05).Conclusions Comprehensive nursingintervention can reduce the stigma of schizophrenia patients,and improve their social function as well as their quality of life.