中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2013年
16期
7-10
,共4页
姜铖%刘佳%岳庆雄%周瑜
薑鋮%劉佳%嶽慶雄%週瑜
강성%류가%악경웅%주유
超声心动描记术,压力%高血压,肺性%心房功能,右%左心房容积追踪技术
超聲心動描記術,壓力%高血壓,肺性%心房功能,右%左心房容積追蹤技術
초성심동묘기술,압력%고혈압,폐성%심방공능,우%좌심방용적추종기술
Echocardiography,stress%Hypertension,pulmonary%Atrial function,right%Left atrial volume tracking technique
目的 探讨左心房容积追踪技术(LAVT)评价肺动脉高压患者右心房功能.方法 选择肺动脉高压患者41例作为肺动脉高压组,同时选择与肺动脉高压组患者年龄和性别相匹配的健康体检者37例作为对照组.应用LAVT获取右心房最大容积(RAVmax)、右心房收缩期前容积(RAVpre)及右心房最小容积(RAVmax)、收缩期右心房充盈速率峰值(dv/dtS)、舒张早期右心房排空速率峰值(dv/dtE)及舒张晚期右心房排空速率峰值(dv/dtA),计算右心房被动排空容积(RAVp)、右心房被动排空分数(RAVpEF)、右心房主动排空容积(RAVa)、右心房主动排空分数(RAVaEF)、右心房总排空容积(RAVt)、右心房总排空分数(RAVtEF),所有右心房容积指标均经体表面积校正得到右心房容积指数(RAVI).结果 肺动脉高压组RAVImax、RAVImax、RAVIpre、RAVIt、RAVIa、dv/dtS、dv/dtA显著高于对照组[(78.39±49.35) ml/m2比(24.80±11.91) ml/m2、(62.59±46.56) ml/m2比(17.46±8.40) ml/m2、(70.12±48.03) ml/m2比(20.02±9.46) ml/m2、(18.77±11.47) ml/m2比(9.35±6.74) ml/m2、(8.53±9.81) ml/m2比(3.25±3.00) ml/m2、(145.85±80.56) ml/s比(86.44±48.46) ml/s、(155.63±126.47) ml/s比(67.74±33.27) ml/s],RAVIp显著低于对照组[(6.09±5.16) ml/m2比(10.23±11.12) ml/m2],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组RAVItEF、RAVIpEF、RAVIaEF、dv/dtE比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 肺动脉高压患者右心房助力泵功能、存储器功能增强,管道功能减低,LAVT可无创性评价肺动脉高压患者右心房功能.
目的 探討左心房容積追蹤技術(LAVT)評價肺動脈高壓患者右心房功能.方法 選擇肺動脈高壓患者41例作為肺動脈高壓組,同時選擇與肺動脈高壓組患者年齡和性彆相匹配的健康體檢者37例作為對照組.應用LAVT穫取右心房最大容積(RAVmax)、右心房收縮期前容積(RAVpre)及右心房最小容積(RAVmax)、收縮期右心房充盈速率峰值(dv/dtS)、舒張早期右心房排空速率峰值(dv/dtE)及舒張晚期右心房排空速率峰值(dv/dtA),計算右心房被動排空容積(RAVp)、右心房被動排空分數(RAVpEF)、右心房主動排空容積(RAVa)、右心房主動排空分數(RAVaEF)、右心房總排空容積(RAVt)、右心房總排空分數(RAVtEF),所有右心房容積指標均經體錶麵積校正得到右心房容積指數(RAVI).結果 肺動脈高壓組RAVImax、RAVImax、RAVIpre、RAVIt、RAVIa、dv/dtS、dv/dtA顯著高于對照組[(78.39±49.35) ml/m2比(24.80±11.91) ml/m2、(62.59±46.56) ml/m2比(17.46±8.40) ml/m2、(70.12±48.03) ml/m2比(20.02±9.46) ml/m2、(18.77±11.47) ml/m2比(9.35±6.74) ml/m2、(8.53±9.81) ml/m2比(3.25±3.00) ml/m2、(145.85±80.56) ml/s比(86.44±48.46) ml/s、(155.63±126.47) ml/s比(67.74±33.27) ml/s],RAVIp顯著低于對照組[(6.09±5.16) ml/m2比(10.23±11.12) ml/m2],差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),兩組RAVItEF、RAVIpEF、RAVIaEF、dv/dtE比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 肺動脈高壓患者右心房助力泵功能、存儲器功能增彊,管道功能減低,LAVT可無創性評價肺動脈高壓患者右心房功能.
목적 탐토좌심방용적추종기술(LAVT)평개폐동맥고압환자우심방공능.방법 선택폐동맥고압환자41례작위폐동맥고압조,동시선택여폐동맥고압조환자년령화성별상필배적건강체검자37례작위대조조.응용LAVT획취우심방최대용적(RAVmax)、우심방수축기전용적(RAVpre)급우심방최소용적(RAVmax)、수축기우심방충영속솔봉치(dv/dtS)、서장조기우심방배공속솔봉치(dv/dtE)급서장만기우심방배공속솔봉치(dv/dtA),계산우심방피동배공용적(RAVp)、우심방피동배공분수(RAVpEF)、우심방주동배공용적(RAVa)、우심방주동배공분수(RAVaEF)、우심방총배공용적(RAVt)、우심방총배공분수(RAVtEF),소유우심방용적지표균경체표면적교정득도우심방용적지수(RAVI).결과 폐동맥고압조RAVImax、RAVImax、RAVIpre、RAVIt、RAVIa、dv/dtS、dv/dtA현저고우대조조[(78.39±49.35) ml/m2비(24.80±11.91) ml/m2、(62.59±46.56) ml/m2비(17.46±8.40) ml/m2、(70.12±48.03) ml/m2비(20.02±9.46) ml/m2、(18.77±11.47) ml/m2비(9.35±6.74) ml/m2、(8.53±9.81) ml/m2비(3.25±3.00) ml/m2、(145.85±80.56) ml/s비(86.44±48.46) ml/s、(155.63±126.47) ml/s비(67.74±33.27) ml/s],RAVIp현저저우대조조[(6.09±5.16) ml/m2비(10.23±11.12) ml/m2],차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),량조RAVItEF、RAVIpEF、RAVIaEF、dv/dtE비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 폐동맥고압환자우심방조력빙공능、존저기공능증강,관도공능감저,LAVT가무창성평개폐동맥고압환자우심방공능.
Objective To probe into the application of left atrial volume tracking technique(LAVT)on the evaluation of right atrial function in patients with pulmonary hypertension.Methods Forty-one patients with pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary hypertension group) and 37 control subjects (control group) were involved.Right atrial maximal volume (RAVmax),right atrial presystolic volume(RAVpre),right atrial minimal volume (RAVmax),systolic right atrial filling rate (dv/dtS),early diastolic right atrial emptying rate(dv/dtE) and late diastolic right atrial emptying rate(dv/dtA) was derived by LAVT.Right atrial passive emptying volume (RAVp),right atrial passive emptying fraction (RAVpEF),right atrial active emptying volume (RAVa),right atrial active emptying fraction (RAVaEF),right atrial total emptying volume (RAVt)and right atrial total emptying fraction (RAVtEF) was calculated.All the right atrial volume parameter was corrected by body surface area to obtain right atrial volume index (RAVI).Results RAVImax,RAVImin,RAVIpre,RAVIt,RAVIa,dv/dtS and dv/dtA in pulmonary hypertension group was higher than that in control group [(78.39 ± 49.35) ml/m2 vs.(24.80 ± 11.91) ml/m2,(62.59 ± 46.56) ml/m2vs.(17.46 ± 8.40)ml/m2,(70.12 ± 48.03) ml/m2 vs.(20.02 ± 9.46) ml/m2,(18.77 ± 11.47) ml/m2 vs.(9.35 ± 6.74) ml/m2,(8.53 ± 9.81) ml/m2 vs.(3.25 ± 3.00) ml/m2,(145.85 ± 80.56) ml/s vs.(86.44 ± 48.46) ml/s,(155.63 ±126.47) ml/s vs.(67.74 ± 33.27) ml/s],and RAVIp in pulmonary hypertension group was lower than that in control group [(6.09 ± 5.16) ml/m2 vs.(10.23 ± 11.12) ml/m2],and there were significant differences (P <0.05).But there were no significant differences in RAVItEF,RAVIpEF,RAVIaEF and dv/dtE between two groups (P>0.05).Conclusions In patients with pulmonary hypertension,right atrial booster pump function and reservoir function increases,while right atrial conduit function decreases.LAVT has a potential ability to evaluate right atrial function.