CAJ | 학술논문

目的对比较法在病理解剖学实验教学中的实践效果进行评价.方法将2009级口腔医学专科学生随机分为两组,每组48人.实验组采用病理解剖学与组织学比较的实验教学法,对照组沿用传统实验教学法.对两组的实验考试成绩进行对比,并对实验组学生开展问卷调查.结果实验组实验考试平均成绩为(88.38 ±5.68)分,对照组的实验考试平均成绩为(78.35±4.86)分.两组实验考试成绩比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).问卷调查结果显示,实验组大部分学生赞同采用比较教学法.结论比较教学法是可行的,其实施过程强调温故而知新,加强了基础学科之间的联系,有利于提高病理学实验教学质量.
목적 대비교법재병리해부학실험교학중적실천효과진행평개.방법 장2009급구강의학전과학생수궤분위량조,매조48인.실험조채용병리해부학여조직학비교적실험교학법,대조조연용전통실험교학법.대량조적실험고시성적진행대비,병대실험조학생개전문권조사.결과 실험조실험고시평균성적위(88.38 ±5.68)분,대조조적실험고시평균성적위(78.35±4.86)분.량조실험고시성적비교,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).문권조사결과현시,실험조대부분학생찬동채용비교교학법.결론 비교교학법시가행적,기실시과정강조온고이지신,가강료기출학과지간적련계,유리우제고병이학실험교학질량.
Objective To evaluate the practical efficacy of comparison method in experimental teaching of pathological anatomy.Methods The junior college students of stomatology were divided into experimental group (n =48) and control group (n =48) randomly.Students in experimental group adopted the experimental teaching with comparison method of pathological anatomy and histology while those in control group followed the traditional experimental teaching.Experiment examination results of two groups were compared and questionnaire investigation was carried out among students in experimental group.Results Average score of experiment examination in experimental group was (88.35 ±5.68) while that in control group was (78.35 ±4.86),with statistical differences (P ＜0.01).The results of questionnaire investigation showed that students in experiment group preferred comparison teaching method.Conclusions Comparison teaching method is feasible,the mechanism of which emphasizes gaining new knowledge by reviewing the old and strengthens the contact of basic subjects,therefore it is conducive to enhancing the quality of pathological experimental teaching.