中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2013年
6期
606-608
,共3页
杜颖%赵纯全%邓幼林%王炼炼
杜穎%趙純全%鄧幼林%王煉煉
두영%조순전%산유림%왕련련
妇产科%以问题为基础的学习%临床教学
婦產科%以問題為基礎的學習%臨床教學
부산과%이문제위기출적학습%림상교학
Gynecology and obstetrics%Problem-based learning%Clinical teaching
目的 研究以问题为基础的学习(problem-based learning,PBL)在妇产科临床带教中的效果.方法 将在妇产科见习的2008级临床医学专业学生170人随机分为2组,均采用大课讲授理论知识、病房学习临床病例的形式进行教学.实验组87人采用PBL教学,即大课结束后,教师选择临床病例,学生分小组询问病史、体格检查、讨论、拟订治疗方案,查阅资料、咨询专科医师、确定治疗方案,小组汇报,最后由教师总结、点评.对照组83人采用传统教学,即大课结束后由教师带领学生询问病史、体格检查,分析诊断、鉴别诊断及治疗,然后对其中涉及的知识点进行提问和解答.通过出科考核(包括理论知识和病例分析)、问卷调查评估学生解决实际问题的能力.数据采用SPSS11.5进行统计分析,计量资料采用t检验,数据用均数±标准差((x-)±s)表示,计数资料采用x2检验.以P≤0.05为差异具有统计学意义.结果 实验组与对照组的理论成绩差异无统计学意义,但实验组病例分析成绩明显高于对照组(t=2.236,P=0.017),实验组学生对PBL教学的满意度明显高于对照组学生对传统教学法的满意度.结论 在妇产科临床教学中,PBL优于传统教学,可以提高学生分析问题、解决问题的能力.
目的 研究以問題為基礎的學習(problem-based learning,PBL)在婦產科臨床帶教中的效果.方法 將在婦產科見習的2008級臨床醫學專業學生170人隨機分為2組,均採用大課講授理論知識、病房學習臨床病例的形式進行教學.實驗組87人採用PBL教學,即大課結束後,教師選擇臨床病例,學生分小組詢問病史、體格檢查、討論、擬訂治療方案,查閱資料、咨詢專科醫師、確定治療方案,小組彙報,最後由教師總結、點評.對照組83人採用傳統教學,即大課結束後由教師帶領學生詢問病史、體格檢查,分析診斷、鑒彆診斷及治療,然後對其中涉及的知識點進行提問和解答.通過齣科攷覈(包括理論知識和病例分析)、問捲調查評估學生解決實際問題的能力.數據採用SPSS11.5進行統計分析,計量資料採用t檢驗,數據用均數±標準差((x-)±s)錶示,計數資料採用x2檢驗.以P≤0.05為差異具有統計學意義.結果 實驗組與對照組的理論成績差異無統計學意義,但實驗組病例分析成績明顯高于對照組(t=2.236,P=0.017),實驗組學生對PBL教學的滿意度明顯高于對照組學生對傳統教學法的滿意度.結論 在婦產科臨床教學中,PBL優于傳統教學,可以提高學生分析問題、解決問題的能力.
목적 연구이문제위기출적학습(problem-based learning,PBL)재부산과림상대교중적효과.방법 장재부산과견습적2008급림상의학전업학생170인수궤분위2조,균채용대과강수이론지식、병방학습림상병례적형식진행교학.실험조87인채용PBL교학,즉대과결속후,교사선택림상병례,학생분소조순문병사、체격검사、토론、의정치료방안,사열자료、자순전과의사、학정치료방안,소조회보,최후유교사총결、점평.대조조83인채용전통교학,즉대과결속후유교사대령학생순문병사、체격검사,분석진단、감별진단급치료,연후대기중섭급적지식점진행제문화해답.통과출과고핵(포괄이론지식화병례분석)、문권조사평고학생해결실제문제적능력.수거채용SPSS11.5진행통계분석,계량자료채용t검험,수거용균수±표준차((x-)±s)표시,계수자료채용x2검험.이P≤0.05위차이구유통계학의의.결과 실험조여대조조적이론성적차이무통계학의의,단실험조병례분석성적명현고우대조조(t=2.236,P=0.017),실험조학생대PBL교학적만의도명현고우대조조학생대전통교학법적만의도.결론 재부산과림상교학중,PBL우우전통교학,가이제고학생분석문제、해결문제적능력.
Objective To study the efficacy of problem-based learning (PBL) in clinical teaching of gynecology and obstetrics.Methods Totally 170 students in our department for probationary were divided into two groups randomly.Students in the two groups were taught by theoretical lecture and case study in the ward.PBL (After the lectures,teachers choose clinical cases,students inquire medical history and do physical examination,students discuss on the case and propose treatment scheme,students look up references and consult specialist to determine treatment scheme,students do team report and teachers give comments) was used in experimental group (n=87) while traditional teaching method (teachers guide students to inquire medical history,do physical examination,analyze the cases and make diagnosis,do differential diagnosis and give treatment as well as answer the questions posed by students) in control group (n=83).Ability of students to solve the practical problems was assessed by final examination (theoretical exam and case analysis) and the efficacy of PBL was investigated by questionnaire survey.SPSS 11.5 soft ware was employed to do statistic analysis.Measurement data were analyzed by t test and manifested asand enumeration data were analyzed by chi-square test.P≤ 0.05 stands for statistical differences.Results There was no difference in theoretical score between experimental group and control group.Score of case analysis was higher in experimental group than in control group (t=2.236,P=0.017).Students' satisfaction degree of PBL was much higher than that of traditional teaching method.Conclusions PBL is better than traditional teaching method in clinical teaching of gynecology and obstetrics.It can improve students' ability of problem-analyzing and problem-solving,therefore should be promoted in clinie education.