中华地方病学杂志
中華地方病學雜誌
중화지방병학잡지
Chinese Journal of Endemiology
2014年
5期
526-529
,共4页
刘昭兵%陈贵春%龚晓俊%黄红武%邹志霆%唐光鹏
劉昭兵%陳貴春%龔曉俊%黃紅武%鄒誌霆%唐光鵬
류소병%진귀춘%공효준%황홍무%추지정%당광붕
鼠疫%流行病学%数据收集
鼠疫%流行病學%數據收集
서역%류행병학%수거수집
Plague%Epidemiology%Data collection
目的 分析2000-2012年贵州省鼠疫疫源地监测结果,掌握该疫源地鼠疫流行现状及趋势.方法 收集2000-2012年贵州省兴义市、安龙县和顶效区3个县(市、区)鼠疫疫情报告、疫源地调查和动物鼠疫监测等资料,分析贵州省鼠疫疫源活动状态.结果 2000-2003年,兴义市、安龙县发生了人间鼠疫流行,累计有腺鼠疫患者137例,死亡1例;66个村寨发生鼠间鼠疫流行,共检出鼠疫菌54株,鼠疫F1抗原阳性鼠49只,占30.62％(49/160).2004-2012年未发生人间鼠疫.2005和2006年分别在顶效区和兴义市检出鼠疫F1抗体阳性鼠4只,2007-2012年未检出鼠疫菌和鼠疫F1抗体.2000-2003年为鼠疫流行期,2004-2006年为疫源活动期,2007-2012年为静息期.疫源地优势鼠种为黄胸鼠,占42.83％(7 966/18 597),鼠疫流行期和疫源活动期的优势鼠种为褐家鼠,构成比为47.22％(1 480/3 134)和35.35％(2071/5 196),鼠疫流行期的鼠密度为5.34％,与疫源活动期(3.27％)和静息期(1.74％)比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=2 286.15,P＜ 0.01).印鼠客蚤为优势蚤种,占56.34％(10 034/17 811);鼠疫流行时印鼠客蚤指数为1.537 9,与活动期(0.959 6)和静息期(0.540 4)比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=492.68,P＜ 0.01).结论 贵州鼠疫疫源处于静息状态,鼠密度和印鼠客蚤指数低于国家鼠疫控制标准.
目的 分析2000-2012年貴州省鼠疫疫源地鑑測結果,掌握該疫源地鼠疫流行現狀及趨勢.方法 收集2000-2012年貴州省興義市、安龍縣和頂效區3箇縣(市、區)鼠疫疫情報告、疫源地調查和動物鼠疫鑑測等資料,分析貴州省鼠疫疫源活動狀態.結果 2000-2003年,興義市、安龍縣髮生瞭人間鼠疫流行,纍計有腺鼠疫患者137例,死亡1例;66箇村寨髮生鼠間鼠疫流行,共檢齣鼠疫菌54株,鼠疫F1抗原暘性鼠49隻,佔30.62％(49/160).2004-2012年未髮生人間鼠疫.2005和2006年分彆在頂效區和興義市檢齣鼠疫F1抗體暘性鼠4隻,2007-2012年未檢齣鼠疫菌和鼠疫F1抗體.2000-2003年為鼠疫流行期,2004-2006年為疫源活動期,2007-2012年為靜息期.疫源地優勢鼠種為黃胸鼠,佔42.83％(7 966/18 597),鼠疫流行期和疫源活動期的優勢鼠種為褐傢鼠,構成比為47.22％(1 480/3 134)和35.35％(2071/5 196),鼠疫流行期的鼠密度為5.34％,與疫源活動期(3.27％)和靜息期(1.74％)比較,差異有統計學意義(x2=2 286.15,P＜ 0.01).印鼠客蚤為優勢蚤種,佔56.34％(10 034/17 811);鼠疫流行時印鼠客蚤指數為1.537 9,與活動期(0.959 6)和靜息期(0.540 4)比較,差異有統計學意義(x2=492.68,P＜ 0.01).結論 貴州鼠疫疫源處于靜息狀態,鼠密度和印鼠客蚤指數低于國傢鼠疫控製標準.
목적 분석2000-2012년귀주성서역역원지감측결과,장악해역원지서역류행현상급추세.방법 수집2000-2012년귀주성흥의시、안룡현화정효구3개현(시、구)서역역정보고、역원지조사화동물서역감측등자료,분석귀주성서역역원활동상태.결과 2000-2003년,흥의시、안룡현발생료인간서역류행,루계유선서역환자137례,사망1례;66개촌채발생서간서역류행,공검출서역균54주,서역F1항원양성서49지,점30.62％(49/160).2004-2012년미발생인간서역.2005화2006년분별재정효구화흥의시검출서역F1항체양성서4지,2007-2012년미검출서역균화서역F1항체.2000-2003년위서역류행기,2004-2006년위역원활동기,2007-2012년위정식기.역원지우세서충위황흉서,점42.83％(7 966/18 597),서역류행기화역원활동기적우세서충위갈가서,구성비위47.22％(1 480/3 134)화35.35％(2071/5 196),서역류행기적서밀도위5.34％,여역원활동기(3.27％)화정식기(1.74％)비교,차이유통계학의의(x2=2 286.15,P＜ 0.01).인서객조위우세조충,점56.34％(10 034/17 811);서역류행시인서객조지수위1.537 9,여활동기(0.959 6)화정식기(0.540 4)비교,차이유통계학의의(x2=492.68,P＜ 0.01).결론 귀주서역역원처우정식상태,서밀도화인서객조지수저우국가서역공제표준.
Objective To master the prevalence of plague and its trend in Guizhou Province,and to analyze the plague monitoring results from 2000 to 2012.Methods The report of infectious disease,the information of plague natural focus and the epizootic monitoring data of Xingyi City,Anlong County and Dingxiao Distract of Guizhou Province from 2000 to 2012 were collected and the status of the plague natural focus was analyzed.Results There were 137 cases of gland plague in Xingyi City and Arlong county from 2000-2003,1 death,and mt plague occurred in 66 villages.Fifty-four strains of Yersiniapestis were detected and 49 rats were plague antigen F1 positive(49/160).No human plague occurred between 2004-2012.A total of 4 plague antigen F1 positive rats were detected in Dingxiao District and Xingyi City in 2005 and 2006.There was no Yersinia pestis and F1 antibody in 2007-2012.The epidemic stage of plague was from 2000-2003; the active stage was from 2004-2006; and the quiescent stage was from 2007-2012.The dominant species of the plague natural focus was Rattus flavipestus (42.83％,7 966/18 597),but was replaced by Rattus norvegicus at the epidemic stage (47.22％,1 480/3 134) and the active stage(35.35％,2 071/5 196).The density of rodents was 5.34％ at the epidemic stage,which was higher than that of the active stage (3.27％) and the quiescent stage (1.71％,x2 =2 286.15,P ＜ 0.01).Xenopsylla cheopis(56.34％,10 034/17 811) was the dominant species,and the index was 1.537 9,which was greater than those of the active stage(0.959 6) and the quiescent stage(0.540 4,x2 =492.68,P ＜ 0.01).Conclusions The plague of Guizhou Province is at the quiescent stage.Both the density of rodents and the Xenopsylla cheopis index are lower than the national standard of controlling.
