中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2013年
15期
2324-2326
,共3页
正畸牵引%烤瓷修复%龈下断根%前牙
正畸牽引%烤瓷脩複%齦下斷根%前牙
정기견인%고자수복%간하단근%전아
orthodontic traction%porcelain%subgingival root pruning%anterior teeth
目的 探讨正畸牵引后烤瓷修复前牙龈下断根的效果.方法 选择前牙断根至龈下的患者63例,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,对照组应用常规处理方法,观察组患者采用正畸牵引与烤瓷修复的方法.比较两组治疗有效率及一般治疗情况.结果 观察组治愈12例,有效17例,无效2例,总有效率为93.55％ (29/31)；对照组治愈9例,有效14例,无效9例,总有效率为71.88％ (23/32).观察组治疗有效率显著高于对照组(x2=5.1323,P=0.0235).观察组患齿松动度、牙龈情况、牙周状况及骨质吸收的治疗有效率分别为93.55％、93.55％、100.00％和96.77％,均显著高于对照组(71.88％、68.75％、71.88％、75.00％)(均P＜0.05).两组烤瓷冠固位情况差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 正畸牵引后烤瓷修复对前牙龈下断根的治疗具有良好的效果.
目的 探討正畸牽引後烤瓷脩複前牙齦下斷根的效果.方法 選擇前牙斷根至齦下的患者63例,採用隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組,對照組應用常規處理方法,觀察組患者採用正畸牽引與烤瓷脩複的方法.比較兩組治療有效率及一般治療情況.結果 觀察組治愈12例,有效17例,無效2例,總有效率為93.55％ (29/31)；對照組治愈9例,有效14例,無效9例,總有效率為71.88％ (23/32).觀察組治療有效率顯著高于對照組(x2=5.1323,P=0.0235).觀察組患齒鬆動度、牙齦情況、牙週狀況及骨質吸收的治療有效率分彆為93.55％、93.55％、100.00％和96.77％,均顯著高于對照組(71.88％、68.75％、71.88％、75.00％)(均P＜0.05).兩組烤瓷冠固位情況差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).結論 正畸牽引後烤瓷脩複對前牙齦下斷根的治療具有良好的效果.
목적 탐토정기견인후고자수복전아간하단근적효과.방법 선택전아단근지간하적환자63례,채용수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조,대조조응용상규처리방법,관찰조환자채용정기견인여고자수복적방법.비교량조치료유효솔급일반치료정황.결과 관찰조치유12례,유효17례,무효2례,총유효솔위93.55％ (29/31)；대조조치유9례,유효14례,무효9례,총유효솔위71.88％ (23/32).관찰조치료유효솔현저고우대조조(x2=5.1323,P=0.0235).관찰조환치송동도、아간정황、아주상황급골질흡수적치료유효솔분별위93.55％、93.55％、100.00％화96.77％,균현저고우대조조(71.88％、68.75％、71.88％、75.00％)(균P＜0.05).량조고자관고위정황차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).결론 정기견인후고자수복대전아간하단근적치료구유량호적효과.
Objective To investigate the effect of Orthodontic traction and porcelain in the treatment of anterior teeth subgingival quit.Methods 63 patients with anterior teeth subgingival quit were randomly assigned into observation group and control group,the control group were treated with conventional processing methods,the observation group were treated with orthodontic traction and porcelain repair nethod.the efficient and general treatment were compared.Results In the observation group,there were 12 cases cured,17 cases effective,2 cases ineffective,the total effective rate was 93.55％ (29/31) ; in the control group,there were 9 cases cured,14 cases effective,9 cases ineffctive,the total effective rate was 71.88％ (23/32).There were significantly difference between two groups (x2 =5.1323,P =0.0235).Tooth loose degrees,gingival condition and periodontal status and treatment of bone resorption rates of the observation group were 93.55％,93.55％,100.00％ and 96.77％,significantly higher than the control(71.88％,68.75％,71.88％,75.00％),the differences were statistically significant (all P ＜ 0.05).Crown retention between the two groups showed no significant difference between cases (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion orthodontictraction has good effect in the treatment of former porcelain subgingival root pruning.
