中华胃肠外科杂志
中華胃腸外科雜誌
중화위장외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
2013年
1期
56-59
,共4页
肖隆斌%杨世斌%许峰峰%黎文峰%吴文辉%李明哲
肖隆斌%楊世斌%許峰峰%黎文峰%吳文輝%李明哲
초륭빈%양세빈%허봉봉%려문봉%오문휘%리명철
胃肿瘤%肿瘤分期%淋巴结转移度%预后
胃腫瘤%腫瘤分期%淋巴結轉移度%預後
위종류%종류분기%림파결전이도%예후
Stomach neoplasms%Neoplasm staging%Metastatic lymph node rate%Prognosis
目的 评估淋巴结转移率(MLR)分期系统对胃癌根治术后患者预后评估的价值.方法 依据MLR分期及第6版、第7版UICC指南N分期这3种分期方法,对1042例胃癌D2根治术后患者进行预后分析.比较3种分期方法预测预后的齐性、相关性和梯度变化曲线,以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC).结果 1042例患者术后5年生存率为47.5%,单因素和多因素预后分析显示,MLR分期(P<0.01)和第7版N分期(P<0.05)均为1042例胃癌患者的独立预后因素.MLR分期预测预后的AUC为0.754,高于第6版N分期的0.692和第7版N分期的0.705.与第6版、第7版N分期比较,MLR分期预测预后具有更好的齐性和线性曲线,Akaike信息标准化值更低(7240.017比7364.073和7325.731).结论 MLR分期对胃癌根治术患者的预后预测价值优于UICC指南中的N分期,有望成为一种新的淋巴结分期方法.
目的 評估淋巴結轉移率(MLR)分期繫統對胃癌根治術後患者預後評估的價值.方法 依據MLR分期及第6版、第7版UICC指南N分期這3種分期方法,對1042例胃癌D2根治術後患者進行預後分析.比較3種分期方法預測預後的齊性、相關性和梯度變化麯線,以及受試者工作特徵(ROC)麯線下麵積(AUC).結果 1042例患者術後5年生存率為47.5%,單因素和多因素預後分析顯示,MLR分期(P<0.01)和第7版N分期(P<0.05)均為1042例胃癌患者的獨立預後因素.MLR分期預測預後的AUC為0.754,高于第6版N分期的0.692和第7版N分期的0.705.與第6版、第7版N分期比較,MLR分期預測預後具有更好的齊性和線性麯線,Akaike信息標準化值更低(7240.017比7364.073和7325.731).結論 MLR分期對胃癌根治術患者的預後預測價值優于UICC指南中的N分期,有望成為一種新的淋巴結分期方法.
목적 평고림파결전이솔(MLR)분기계통대위암근치술후환자예후평고적개치.방법 의거MLR분기급제6판、제7판UICC지남N분기저3충분기방법,대1042례위암D2근치술후환자진행예후분석.비교3충분기방법예측예후적제성、상관성화제도변화곡선,이급수시자공작특정(ROC)곡선하면적(AUC).결과 1042례환자술후5년생존솔위47.5%,단인소화다인소예후분석현시,MLR분기(P<0.01)화제7판N분기(P<0.05)균위1042례위암환자적독립예후인소.MLR분기예측예후적AUC위0.754,고우제6판N분기적0.692화제7판N분기적0.705.여제6판、제7판N분기비교,MLR분기예측예후구유경호적제성화선성곡선,Akaike신식표준화치경저(7240.017비7364.073화7325.731).결론 MLR분기대위암근치술환자적예후예측개치우우UICC지남중적N분기,유망성위일충신적림파결분기방법.
Objective To assess the prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy(D2).Methods Prognostic analysis of 1042 gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy (D2) was performed based on metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR),the N staging in the 6th and 7th edition of UICC staging system respectively.Homogeneity,discriminatory ability,and gradient monotonicity of these three staging methods were compared using linear trend x2,likelihood ratio x2 statistics and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations,respectively.The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to compare the prognostic value of these three staging methods.Results The 5-year survival rate of 1042 patients was 47.5%.The metastatic lymph node ratio(P<0.01) and N staging of the 7th edition UICC (P<0.05) were independent prognostic factors according to univariate and multivariate analyses.The AUC was 0.754 in MLR staging group,higher than that in N staging of the 6th(0.692) and 7th(0.705) edition of UICC group.Compared to the 6th and 7th edition of UICC N staging group,homogeneity and linear curve were better and AIC value was lower in MLR staging group(7240.017 vs.7364.073 and 7325.731).Conclusion Prognostic value of MLR staging is better than that of UICC N staging for patients undergoing radical gastric cancer resection.The MLR staging can be a new method of lymph node staging for gastric cancer patients.