中国综合临床
中國綜閤臨床
중국종합림상
CLINICAL MEDICINE OF CHINA
2011年
8期
798-801
,共4页
王雪文%顾克菊%钟秀君%陶建敏%杨红梅%袁艳玲
王雪文%顧剋菊%鐘秀君%陶建敏%楊紅梅%袁豔玲
왕설문%고극국%종수군%도건민%양홍매%원염령
呼吸机相关肺炎%机械通气%呼吸机管路
呼吸機相關肺炎%機械通氣%呼吸機管路
호흡궤상관폐염%궤계통기%호흡궤관로
Ventilator-associated pneumonia%Ventilation%Ventilator tube
目的 探讨呼吸机管路更换频率对呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)发病率的影响.方法 选择2008年3月至2010年9月人住我院综合性ICU、急诊科、呼吸内科、神经外科机械通气患者,随机分为呼吸机管路每周更换2次组与呼吸机管路每周更换1次组;目标性监测记录使用呼吸机患者的临床症状和体征变化;采集不同部位微生物标本送检,并进行统计学分析.结果 呼吸机管路每周更换2次组VAP的发生率为28.30%(15/53),每周更换1次组为35.84%(19/53),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.533);呼吸机管路每周更换2次组呼吸机管路病原微生物检出率为44.49%(271/609),每周更换1次组为48.16%(289/600),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);组间呼吸机管路不同部位病原微生物检出情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);VAP的病原微生物以革兰阴性菌为主,鲍曼不动杆菌检出占首位.结论 呼吸机管路更换频率不影响VAP的发病率,建议使用中的呼吸机管路每7天更换1次;同时应加强护理人员专科技术培训,从多环节降低医院感染的发生率.
目的 探討呼吸機管路更換頻率對呼吸機相關肺炎(VAP)髮病率的影響.方法 選擇2008年3月至2010年9月人住我院綜閤性ICU、急診科、呼吸內科、神經外科機械通氣患者,隨機分為呼吸機管路每週更換2次組與呼吸機管路每週更換1次組;目標性鑑測記錄使用呼吸機患者的臨床癥狀和體徵變化;採集不同部位微生物標本送檢,併進行統計學分析.結果 呼吸機管路每週更換2次組VAP的髮生率為28.30%(15/53),每週更換1次組為35.84%(19/53),組間比較差異無統計學意義(P=0.533);呼吸機管路每週更換2次組呼吸機管路病原微生物檢齣率為44.49%(271/609),每週更換1次組為48.16%(289/600),組間比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);組間呼吸機管路不同部位病原微生物檢齣情況比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);VAP的病原微生物以革蘭陰性菌為主,鮑曼不動桿菌檢齣佔首位.結論 呼吸機管路更換頻率不影響VAP的髮病率,建議使用中的呼吸機管路每7天更換1次;同時應加彊護理人員專科技術培訓,從多環節降低醫院感染的髮生率.
목적 탐토호흡궤관로경환빈솔대호흡궤상관폐염(VAP)발병솔적영향.방법 선택2008년3월지2010년9월인주아원종합성ICU、급진과、호흡내과、신경외과궤계통기환자,수궤분위호흡궤관로매주경환2차조여호흡궤관로매주경환1차조;목표성감측기록사용호흡궤환자적림상증상화체정변화;채집불동부위미생물표본송검,병진행통계학분석.결과 호흡궤관로매주경환2차조VAP적발생솔위28.30%(15/53),매주경환1차조위35.84%(19/53),조간비교차이무통계학의의(P=0.533);호흡궤관로매주경환2차조호흡궤관로병원미생물검출솔위44.49%(271/609),매주경환1차조위48.16%(289/600),조간비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);조간호흡궤관로불동부위병원미생물검출정황비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);VAP적병원미생물이혁란음성균위주,포만불동간균검출점수위.결론 호흡궤관로경환빈솔불영향VAP적발병솔,건의사용중적호흡궤관로매7천경환1차;동시응가강호리인원전과기술배훈,종다배절강저의원감염적발생솔.
Objective To explore the effect of ventilator circuit change frequency on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods Patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU,Department of Emergency, Respiratory Department and Department of Neurosurgery from March 2008 to September 2010 were randomized into two groups. For these two groups ,the ventilator circuit was changed once or twice a week. The recorded parameters included the clinical symptoms and signs of the ventilated patients. Samples at different parts of the circuit were collected for microbiological detection. The data were analyzed statistically. Results The incidence of VAP was 28. 30% ( 13/53 ) in twice-a-week group and 35.84%( 19/53 ) in once-a-week group. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The rates for positive microbiological detection in the circuit were 48. 16% and 44. 49% for once-a-week and twice-a-week group,respectively. No significant difference was observed ( P > 0.05 ). Moreover, there was no significant difference in terms of the microbiology positivity between different parts of the circuit(P > 0. 05 ). Gram-negative bacteria were the main pathogen of VAP with Acinetobacter baumannii ranking at the top. Conclusion Frequency of Ventilator circuit change does not influence the incidence of VAP. We suggest that the frequency for ventilator circuit change should be once a week. At the same time, the nurse staff should be trained for specific technology and the incidence of hospital infection should be controlled at multiple rings of the chain.