中华超声影像学杂志
中華超聲影像學雜誌
중화초성영상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY
2010年
2期
167-170
,共4页
袁宇%安力春%井萍%高金妹%郭林
袁宇%安力春%井萍%高金妹%郭林
원우%안력춘%정평%고금매%곽림
超声检查%微气泡%肾/损伤
超聲檢查%微氣泡%腎/損傷
초성검사%미기포%신/손상
Ultrasonography%Microbubbles%Kidney/injuries
目的 探讨超声造影评价不同级别的闭合性肾损伤的价值.方法 对12只实验兔建立闭合性损伤动物模型,撞击后对肾进行常规灰阶超声、超声造影及增强CT检查,依据Sargent分类诊断标准确定损伤程度,并对上述检查结果进行对照研究.结果 超声造影可清晰显示肾损伤病灶的部位、形态、范围,其显爪肾内损伤区的敏感性为100%(30/30).增强CT敏感性为83.3%(25/30),另5个肾内损伤灶未显示,超声造影显示此5个损伤灶损伤程度Ⅰ为、Ⅱ类.超声造影与增强CT对肾损伤显示的敏感性差异无统汁学意义(P>0.05),而超声造影对细小病灶的显示敏感性高于增强CT(P<0.(15).结论 超声造影可显著提高常规超声对肾损伤的诊断水平,并能有效评价肾损伤的程度,与增强CT比较其在细小病灶和活动性出血的显示方面具有一定的优势.
目的 探討超聲造影評價不同級彆的閉閤性腎損傷的價值.方法 對12隻實驗兔建立閉閤性損傷動物模型,撞擊後對腎進行常規灰階超聲、超聲造影及增彊CT檢查,依據Sargent分類診斷標準確定損傷程度,併對上述檢查結果進行對照研究.結果 超聲造影可清晰顯示腎損傷病竈的部位、形態、範圍,其顯爪腎內損傷區的敏感性為100%(30/30).增彊CT敏感性為83.3%(25/30),另5箇腎內損傷竈未顯示,超聲造影顯示此5箇損傷竈損傷程度Ⅰ為、Ⅱ類.超聲造影與增彊CT對腎損傷顯示的敏感性差異無統汁學意義(P>0.05),而超聲造影對細小病竈的顯示敏感性高于增彊CT(P<0.(15).結論 超聲造影可顯著提高常規超聲對腎損傷的診斷水平,併能有效評價腎損傷的程度,與增彊CT比較其在細小病竈和活動性齣血的顯示方麵具有一定的優勢.
목적 탐토초성조영평개불동급별적폐합성신손상적개치.방법 대12지실험토건립폐합성손상동물모형,당격후대신진행상규회계초성、초성조영급증강CT검사,의거Sargent분류진단표준학정손상정도,병대상술검사결과진행대조연구.결과 초성조영가청석현시신손상병조적부위、형태、범위,기현조신내손상구적민감성위100%(30/30).증강CT민감성위83.3%(25/30),령5개신내손상조미현시,초성조영현시차5개손상조손상정도Ⅰ위、Ⅱ류.초성조영여증강CT대신손상현시적민감성차이무통즙학의의(P>0.05),이초성조영대세소병조적현시민감성고우증강CT(P<0.(15).결론 초성조영가현저제고상규초성대신손상적진단수평,병능유효평개신손상적정도,여증강CT비교기재세소병조화활동성출혈적현시방면구유일정적우세.
Objective To analyze the value of contrast-enhanced uhrasonography(CEUS) in the diagnosis of renal injury by comparing with contrast enhanced computed tomography(CECT). Methods Blunt renal traumatic lesions were made in 12 rabbits. Conventional ultrasound,CEUS and CECT were used to detect traumatic lesions of kidneys after impacting. According to the Sargent scale, the degree of injuries was determined by CEUS,the results of which were compared with those of CECT. Results The position,morphology and range of the traumatic lesions were displayed clearly on the CEUS. The sensitivity of gray scale CEUS detecting the traumatic lesions was 100% (30/30). The sensitivity of CECT was 83.30.% (25/30). All of the five misdiagnosed lesions on CECT were clearly displayed as grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ on gray scale CEUS. The sensitivity of the two ways did not show significant difference ( P >0. 05) in detecting renal injury. The sensitivity of CEUS detecting the tiny traumatic lesions was significantly higher than that of CECT ( P<0.05). Conclusions CEUS can improve the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal injury and evaluate the degree of renal injury effectively. Furthermore it is superior to CECT in detecting the tiny traumatic lesions and active hemorrhage.