中华放射学杂志
中華放射學雜誌
중화방사학잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2013年
11期
1005-1008
,共4页
石喻%郭启勇%张兰%夏菲%于兵
石喻%郭啟勇%張蘭%夏菲%于兵
석유%곽계용%장란%하비%우병
肝%纤维化%磁共振成像
肝%纖維化%磁共振成像
간%섬유화%자공진성상
Liver%Fibrosis%Magnetic resonance imaging
目的 探讨3.0TMR弹性成像(MRE)评价健康志愿者及慢性肝病患者肝弹性值的可靠性及评估者测量结果的一致性.方法采用3.0 T MRE分析24名健康志愿者(无肝病组)及64例临床确诊的慢性肝病患者(肝病组,其中22例经肝脏穿刺活检证实)肝脏的弹性值.由2名评估者盲法测量肝弹性值,采用组内相关系数(ICC)评价评估者所测肝弹性值的一致性,采用Mann-Whitney U检验分析两组受试者肝弹性值的差异,采用Spearman检验分析病理纤维化分期与肝弹性值之间的相关性.结果2名评估者所测肝弹性值之间具有良好的一致性(ICC=0.99),无肝病组及肝病组受试者的肝弹性值分别为(2.35±0.34) kPa及(4.17±0.47) kPa,二者的差异有统计学意义(U=90.5,P<0.01).22例行肝穿刺患者肝纤维化分期S0、S1、S2、S3和S4患者分别为3、3、5、5和6例,肝弹性值中位数分别为2.13、3.25、3.82、5.45和7.35 kPa,弹性值与纤维化分期之间具有强相关性(r=0.96,P<0.01).结论 MRE是一种可靠的测量肝弹性值及评估肝纤维化分期的方法.
目的 探討3.0TMR彈性成像(MRE)評價健康誌願者及慢性肝病患者肝彈性值的可靠性及評估者測量結果的一緻性.方法採用3.0 T MRE分析24名健康誌願者(無肝病組)及64例臨床確診的慢性肝病患者(肝病組,其中22例經肝髒穿刺活檢證實)肝髒的彈性值.由2名評估者盲法測量肝彈性值,採用組內相關繫數(ICC)評價評估者所測肝彈性值的一緻性,採用Mann-Whitney U檢驗分析兩組受試者肝彈性值的差異,採用Spearman檢驗分析病理纖維化分期與肝彈性值之間的相關性.結果2名評估者所測肝彈性值之間具有良好的一緻性(ICC=0.99),無肝病組及肝病組受試者的肝彈性值分彆為(2.35±0.34) kPa及(4.17±0.47) kPa,二者的差異有統計學意義(U=90.5,P<0.01).22例行肝穿刺患者肝纖維化分期S0、S1、S2、S3和S4患者分彆為3、3、5、5和6例,肝彈性值中位數分彆為2.13、3.25、3.82、5.45和7.35 kPa,彈性值與纖維化分期之間具有彊相關性(r=0.96,P<0.01).結論 MRE是一種可靠的測量肝彈性值及評估肝纖維化分期的方法.
목적 탐토3.0TMR탄성성상(MRE)평개건강지원자급만성간병환자간탄성치적가고성급평고자측량결과적일치성.방법채용3.0 T MRE분석24명건강지원자(무간병조)급64례림상학진적만성간병환자(간병조,기중22례경간장천자활검증실)간장적탄성치.유2명평고자맹법측량간탄성치,채용조내상관계수(ICC)평개평고자소측간탄성치적일치성,채용Mann-Whitney U검험분석량조수시자간탄성치적차이,채용Spearman검험분석병리섬유화분기여간탄성치지간적상관성.결과2명평고자소측간탄성치지간구유량호적일치성(ICC=0.99),무간병조급간병조수시자적간탄성치분별위(2.35±0.34) kPa급(4.17±0.47) kPa,이자적차이유통계학의의(U=90.5,P<0.01).22례행간천자환자간섬유화분기S0、S1、S2、S3화S4환자분별위3、3、5、5화6례,간탄성치중위수분별위2.13、3.25、3.82、5.45화7.35 kPa,탄성치여섬유화분기지간구유강상관성(r=0.96,P<0.01).결론 MRE시일충가고적측량간탄성치급평고간섬유화분기적방법.
Objective To estimate reliability of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in measuring liver stiffness of volunteers and patients with chronic liver disease and to assess inter-rater consistency.Methods MRE was performed on a 3.0 T scanner in all subjects,including 24 volunteers (control group) and 64 patients with liver disease (chronic liver disease group).Liver stiffness was measured blindly by two raters.The pathological fibrosis score was applied as a standard reference for liver fibrosis in 22 patients.The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate inter-rater reliability.The differences of liver stiffness between two groups were evaluated using non-parametric MannWhitney U test.Spearman analysis was used to analyze the correlation between fibrosis stages and liver stiffness.Results The intraclass correlation coefficient of liver stiffness was perfect (ICC =0.99,P < 0.01)between two raters.There was significant difference of mean stiffness between control group and patient group (U =90.5,P <0.01) with(2.35 ±0.34) kPa and(4.17 ± 0.47) kPa,respectively.The correlation between fibrosis stage (3,3,5,5 and 6 patients in fibrosis stage S0,S1,S2,S3 and S4) and stiffness (2.13,3.25,3.82,5.45 and 7.35 kPa) was very strong (r =0.96,P <0.01).Conclusion MRE is a reliable and promising tool to measure liver stiffness and to assess liver fibrosis.