中华放射医学与防护杂志
中華放射醫學與防護雜誌
중화방사의학여방호잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2014年
6期
446-450
,共5页
程晓军%胡传朋%乔红兵%魏坤杰%罗素明%何志坚
程曉軍%鬍傳朋%喬紅兵%魏坤傑%囉素明%何誌堅
정효군%호전붕%교홍병%위곤걸%라소명%하지견
TLD%参与与非参考条件%指形电离室%平行板电离室%光子线束%电子线束
TLD%參與與非參攷條件%指形電離室%平行闆電離室%光子線束%電子線束
TLD%삼여여비삼고조건%지형전리실%평행판전리실%광자선속%전자선속
TLD%Reference and non-reference conditions%Finger ionization chamber%Plane parallel ionization chamber%Photon beam%Electron beam
目的 研究用热释光剂量计(TLD)方法核查放射治疗参考条件和非参考条件下剂量学参数的可靠性验证.方法 在参考条件和非参考条件下,用建立的TLD方法,核查10条6 MV光子线束剂量随照射野大小和45°楔形板等变化,4条9 MeV电子线束轴向最大剂量点处等剂量学参数,TLD估算结果与剂量仪测量结果进行对比.结果 6 MV光子线束TLD估算结果与指形电离室测量结果的平均相对偏差为4.7%,按照IAEA要求允许偏差不超过±7%;9 MeV电子线束TLD估算结果与平行板电离室测量结果平均相对偏差为2.4%,均未超过IAEA允许偏差要求(±5%).结论 用TLD核查参考条件和非参考条件下放射治疗剂量学参数方法可靠,简单易行.
目的 研究用熱釋光劑量計(TLD)方法覈查放射治療參攷條件和非參攷條件下劑量學參數的可靠性驗證.方法 在參攷條件和非參攷條件下,用建立的TLD方法,覈查10條6 MV光子線束劑量隨照射野大小和45°楔形闆等變化,4條9 MeV電子線束軸嚮最大劑量點處等劑量學參數,TLD估算結果與劑量儀測量結果進行對比.結果 6 MV光子線束TLD估算結果與指形電離室測量結果的平均相對偏差為4.7%,按照IAEA要求允許偏差不超過±7%;9 MeV電子線束TLD估算結果與平行闆電離室測量結果平均相對偏差為2.4%,均未超過IAEA允許偏差要求(±5%).結論 用TLD覈查參攷條件和非參攷條件下放射治療劑量學參數方法可靠,簡單易行.
목적 연구용열석광제량계(TLD)방법핵사방사치료삼고조건화비삼고조건하제량학삼수적가고성험증.방법 재삼고조건화비삼고조건하,용건립적TLD방법,핵사10조6 MV광자선속제량수조사야대소화45°설형판등변화,4조9 MeV전자선속축향최대제량점처등제량학삼수,TLD고산결과여제량의측량결과진행대비.결과 6 MV광자선속TLD고산결과여지형전리실측량결과적평균상대편차위4.7%,안조IAEA요구윤허편차불초과±7%;9 MeV전자선속TLD고산결과여평행판전리실측량결과평균상대편차위2.4%,균미초과IAEA윤허편차요구(±5%).결론 용TLD핵사삼고조건화비삼고조건하방사치료제량학삼수방법가고,간단역행.
Objective To verify the reliability of radiotherapy dosimetric parameters in reference and non-reference conditions using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).Methods Using the established TLD method,the dose variations with different radiation field sizes and 45 ° wedge plate were verified for 10 photon beams of 6 MV,together with dosimetric parameters at the point of maximum axial dose for 4 electron beams of 9 MeV under reference and non-reference conditions.Comparisons were made between TLD results and finger ionization chamber results.Results The average relative deviation,for 6 MV photon beams,between TLD results and finger ionization chamber measurements was 4.7%,within ± 7% as required by the IAEA.The average relative deviation,for 9 MeV electron beam,between TLD results and plane parallel ionization chamber measurements was 2.4 %,not beyond ± 5% permitted by IAEA.Conclusions Using TLD method to verify the radiotherapy dosimetric parameters in reference and non-reference conditions was reliable,simple and feasible.