中华放射肿瘤学杂志
中華放射腫瘤學雜誌
중화방사종류학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
2013年
6期
501-503
,共3页
刘晖%张俊%钟亚华%张俊红%张弓%邓涤%谭康
劉暉%張俊%鐘亞華%張俊紅%張弓%鄧滌%譚康
류휘%장준%종아화%장준홍%장궁%산조%담강
摆位误差%立体定向体部放射疗法%体部固定器
襬位誤差%立體定嚮體部放射療法%體部固定器
파위오차%입체정향체부방사요법%체부고정기
Setup error%Stereotactic body radiation therapy%Immobilization device
目的 应用千伏级CBCT评价自制体部固定装置在肺部SBRT中的固定效果.方法 选取SBRT肺肿瘤患者10例(中央型、周围型各5例),通过数据分析得到每次SBRT前后骨性配准和软组织配准的平均摆位误差.采用单因素方差分析两种型别分次间骨性配准后摆位误差差别.结果 中央型和周围型患者分次间骨性配准摆位误差在横断面左右、前后、上下方向不同(P=0.001),分别为(0.01 ±0.32)、(-0.08 ±0.38)、(0.14±0.36) cm和(-0.23 ±0.39)、(-0.13±0.52)、(0.21±0.33) cm,上下方向误差最大(P=0.003),左右方向误差最小(P=0.001).总平均误差分别为(0.09±0.33)、(-0.10±0.44)、(0.17±0.35) cm,效果优于其他常见固定方式.利用骨性配准分次内摆位误差为(0.00±0.00) cm.软组织配准的结果也类似.结论 自制体部固定装置可降低SBRT中肺肿瘤运动范围,提高摆位精度.
目的 應用韆伏級CBCT評價自製體部固定裝置在肺部SBRT中的固定效果.方法 選取SBRT肺腫瘤患者10例(中央型、週圍型各5例),通過數據分析得到每次SBRT前後骨性配準和軟組織配準的平均襬位誤差.採用單因素方差分析兩種型彆分次間骨性配準後襬位誤差差彆.結果 中央型和週圍型患者分次間骨性配準襬位誤差在橫斷麵左右、前後、上下方嚮不同(P=0.001),分彆為(0.01 ±0.32)、(-0.08 ±0.38)、(0.14±0.36) cm和(-0.23 ±0.39)、(-0.13±0.52)、(0.21±0.33) cm,上下方嚮誤差最大(P=0.003),左右方嚮誤差最小(P=0.001).總平均誤差分彆為(0.09±0.33)、(-0.10±0.44)、(0.17±0.35) cm,效果優于其他常見固定方式.利用骨性配準分次內襬位誤差為(0.00±0.00) cm.軟組織配準的結果也類似.結論 自製體部固定裝置可降低SBRT中肺腫瘤運動範圍,提高襬位精度.
목적 응용천복급CBCT평개자제체부고정장치재폐부SBRT중적고정효과.방법 선취SBRT폐종류환자10례(중앙형、주위형각5례),통과수거분석득도매차SBRT전후골성배준화연조직배준적평균파위오차.채용단인소방차분석량충형별분차간골성배준후파위오차차별.결과 중앙형화주위형환자분차간골성배준파위오차재횡단면좌우、전후、상하방향불동(P=0.001),분별위(0.01 ±0.32)、(-0.08 ±0.38)、(0.14±0.36) cm화(-0.23 ±0.39)、(-0.13±0.52)、(0.21±0.33) cm,상하방향오차최대(P=0.003),좌우방향오차최소(P=0.001).총평균오차분별위(0.09±0.33)、(-0.10±0.44)、(0.17±0.35) cm,효과우우기타상견고정방식.이용골성배준분차내파위오차위(0.00±0.00) cm.연조직배준적결과야유사.결론 자제체부고정장치가강저SBRT중폐종류운동범위,제고파위정도.
Objective To evaluate the effect of home-made immobilization device with KV-CBCT in lung-SBRT and investigate its clinical use value.Methods Choosing 10 lung tumor patients (half centre type tumor;half peripheral type) random analysis the interfractional and intrafractional setup errors in the SBRT process by this fixed device with KV-CBCT.The concrete method is using Varian's KV-CBCT scans the patients before and after the SBRT each time,then make the registration between the reconstructed 3 d image and the planned CT image (both based on bone landmark),we then obtain the average setup errors in LR,AP and SI directions.Simultaneously,this research make contrastive analysis of setup errors among this fixed device and other fixed devices such as vacuum pad,phantom in body IMRT.All data make one-factor analysis of variance by SSPS 17.0.Results All the setup errors data was gaussian distribution,the centre type interfraction was at (0.01 ±0.32) cm (LR),(-0.08 ±0.38) cm (AP),(0.14 ±0.36) cm (SI) of the cross section,peripheral type interfraction was at (0.01 ± 0.32) cm (LR),(-0.08 ± 0.38) cm (AP),(0.14 ± 0.36) cm (SI) of the cross section (P =0.001).We found out that the average of lung tumor's setup error at all three directions have no significant difference-the largest was the AP directions (P =0.003),the second was the SI direction (P =0.003) and the smallest was the LR direction (P =0.001).The central type has no significant difference at three directions.Compare to the other fixed device,the average setup errors of our device are (0.09 ± 0.33) cm (LR),(-0.10 ± 0.44) cm (SI),(0.17 ±0.35) cm (AP) better than the report at present paper.As the interfraction setup error was small enough by using this fixed device while it has beyond the system algorithm,the registration software of system shows (0.0 ± 0.0 cm).Conclusions The range of lung tumor motion can be cut down obviously and enhance each placement accuracy,repeatability,on SBRT with home-made immobilization device.