中华骨科杂志
中華骨科雜誌
중화골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
2014年
6期
688-693
,共6页
郑超%伍骥%黄蓉蓉%崔松超%文偃伍%李毅%吴迪
鄭超%伍驥%黃蓉蓉%崔鬆超%文偃伍%李毅%吳迪
정초%오기%황용용%최송초%문언오%리의%오적
航空%踝关节%创伤和损伤
航空%踝關節%創傷和損傷
항공%과관절%창상화손상
Aviation%Ankle joint%Wounds and injuries
目的 通过模拟高空跳伞着陆训练环境测定不同高度半蹲式跳伞着陆状态下的踝关节角速度、地面垂直反作用力,为预防跳伞着陆踝部损伤提供生物力学依据.方法 募集18名健康志愿者,包括空军地勤人员9名、职业跳伞人员9名.两组受试者身高、体重的差异无统计学意义.受试者分别从30 cm和60 cm高的跳台以半蹲式跳伞着陆并腿姿势跳落到测力台上.高速摄像机记录着陆过程,测定踝关节跖屈角位移及时间、地面垂直反作用力,计算角速度,分析踝关节动态角位移、角速度、垂直作用力与不同高度的相关性.结果 30 cm高度:地勤人员组与跳伞运动员组踝关节角位移分别为25.73°±8.13°、20.05°± 12.27°,垂直反作用力分别为(3 372.4±748.6)N、(5 181.5±1 726.2)N,受力时间分别为(0.049±0.015)s、(0.012±0.004)s,缓冲时间分别为(1.397±0.746)s、(1.737±0.451)s,差异均有统计学意义.60 cm高度:地勤人员组与跳伞运动员组踝关节角速度分别为(25.45±15.01)°/s、(16.51±4.18)°/s,垂直反作用力分别为(4 616.0±1124.7)N、(7 119.5±2 307.4)N,受力时间分别为(0.048±0.013)s、(0.015±0.006)s,缓冲时间分别为(0.922±0.347)s、(1.617±0.547)s,差异均有统计学意义.结论 从不同的测试高度跳下,跳伞运动员组的地面垂直反作用力大于地勤人员组,但角速度及角位移小于地勤人员组.对比地勤人员组,跳伞运动员组的受力时间短而缓冲时间更长.
目的 通過模擬高空跳傘著陸訓練環境測定不同高度半蹲式跳傘著陸狀態下的踝關節角速度、地麵垂直反作用力,為預防跳傘著陸踝部損傷提供生物力學依據.方法 募集18名健康誌願者,包括空軍地勤人員9名、職業跳傘人員9名.兩組受試者身高、體重的差異無統計學意義.受試者分彆從30 cm和60 cm高的跳檯以半蹲式跳傘著陸併腿姿勢跳落到測力檯上.高速攝像機記錄著陸過程,測定踝關節蹠屈角位移及時間、地麵垂直反作用力,計算角速度,分析踝關節動態角位移、角速度、垂直作用力與不同高度的相關性.結果 30 cm高度:地勤人員組與跳傘運動員組踝關節角位移分彆為25.73°±8.13°、20.05°± 12.27°,垂直反作用力分彆為(3 372.4±748.6)N、(5 181.5±1 726.2)N,受力時間分彆為(0.049±0.015)s、(0.012±0.004)s,緩遲時間分彆為(1.397±0.746)s、(1.737±0.451)s,差異均有統計學意義.60 cm高度:地勤人員組與跳傘運動員組踝關節角速度分彆為(25.45±15.01)°/s、(16.51±4.18)°/s,垂直反作用力分彆為(4 616.0±1124.7)N、(7 119.5±2 307.4)N,受力時間分彆為(0.048±0.013)s、(0.015±0.006)s,緩遲時間分彆為(0.922±0.347)s、(1.617±0.547)s,差異均有統計學意義.結論 從不同的測試高度跳下,跳傘運動員組的地麵垂直反作用力大于地勤人員組,但角速度及角位移小于地勤人員組.對比地勤人員組,跳傘運動員組的受力時間短而緩遲時間更長.
목적 통과모의고공도산착륙훈련배경측정불동고도반준식도산착륙상태하적과관절각속도、지면수직반작용력,위예방도산착륙과부손상제공생물역학의거.방법 모집18명건강지원자,포괄공군지근인원9명、직업도산인원9명.량조수시자신고、체중적차이무통계학의의.수시자분별종30 cm화60 cm고적도태이반준식도산착륙병퇴자세도락도측력태상.고속섭상궤기록착륙과정,측정과관절척굴각위이급시간、지면수직반작용력,계산각속도,분석과관절동태각위이、각속도、수직작용력여불동고도적상관성.결과 30 cm고도:지근인원조여도산운동원조과관절각위이분별위25.73°±8.13°、20.05°± 12.27°,수직반작용력분별위(3 372.4±748.6)N、(5 181.5±1 726.2)N,수력시간분별위(0.049±0.015)s、(0.012±0.004)s,완충시간분별위(1.397±0.746)s、(1.737±0.451)s,차이균유통계학의의.60 cm고도:지근인원조여도산운동원조과관절각속도분별위(25.45±15.01)°/s、(16.51±4.18)°/s,수직반작용력분별위(4 616.0±1124.7)N、(7 119.5±2 307.4)N,수력시간분별위(0.048±0.013)s、(0.015±0.006)s,완충시간분별위(0.922±0.347)s、(1.617±0.547)s,차이균유통계학의의.결론 종불동적측시고도도하,도산운동원조적지면수직반작용력대우지근인원조,단각속도급각위이소우지근인원조.대비지근인원조,도산운동원조적수력시간단이완충시간경장.
Objective To measure the angular velocity and perpendicular ground reaction force of the ankle joint under different heights with half-squat jumping in parachute training simulation,providing a reliable experiment basis for the preventing of ankle injury.Methods A total of 18 volunteers participated in this study.The experimental group included 9 male with experience of parachute landing,while the other 9 male without experience of parachute landing were assigned to the control group.Each subject was instructed to jump off a platform with a height of 30 cm and 60 cm and land on a hard surface in a half-squat posture.The dynamic landing process was recorded with a high speed camera and the biomechanical data was collected and analyzed,including perpendicular ground reaction force,angular displacement,velocity and acting time.Results From 30 cm's height,the ankle angular displacement of the control group was significantly larger than the experimental group (25.73°± 8.13° vs 20.05°± 12.27°,P < 0.05).The perpendicular ground reaction force of the control group was significantly smaller than the experimental group (3 372.4±748.6 N vs 5 181.5±1 726.2 N,P < 0.05).The acting time of the control group was significantly longer than the ex perimental group (0.049±0.015 s vs 0.012±0.004 s,P < 0.05).The buffer time of the control group was significantly shorter than the experimental group (1.397±0.746 s vs 1.737±0.451 s,P < 0.05).From 60 cm's height,the ankle angular velocity of the control group was significantly higher than the experimental group (25.45± 15.01 °/s vs 16.51 ±4.18 °/s,P < 0.05).The perpendicular ground reaction force of the control group was significantly smaller than the experimental group (4 616.0±1 124.7 N vs 7 119.5±2 307.4 N,P < 0.05).The acting time of the control group was significantly longer than the experimental group (0.048±0.013 s vs 0.015±0.006 s,P < 0.05).The buffer time of the control group was significantly shorter than the experimental group (0.922±0.347 s vs 1.617±0.547 s,P < 0.05).Conclusion Jumping from different heights,the experinental group was larger in perpendicular ground reaction force but smaller in the angular velocity and displacement than the control group.There was a shorter acting time and a longer buffer time in the experimental group than the control group.