中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志
中華航海醫學與高氣壓醫學雜誌
중화항해의학여고기압의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NAUTICAL MEDICINE AND HYPERBARIC MEDICINE
2014年
2期
101-104
,共4页
田磊%刘刚%刘于红%孙强%赵红旗%殷忠%李鹏%李娜%孙涛
田磊%劉剛%劉于紅%孫彊%趙紅旂%慇忠%李鵬%李娜%孫濤
전뢰%류강%류우홍%손강%조홍기%은충%리붕%리나%손도
风险评估%医院船%海外医疗%预后
風險評估%醫院船%海外醫療%預後
풍험평고%의원선%해외의료%예후
Risk evaluation%Hospital ship%Overseas medical service%Prognosis
目的 探讨在医院船平台应用快捷风险评估(fast risk assessment,FRA)模式行手术风险及早期预后评估的效果.方法 “和平方舟”医院船2013年6月至10月海外医疗服务期间,前瞻性将131例前期筛查有手术指征的外籍患者纳入FRA流程,采用自制FRA表进行术前评估.去除2例梅毒抗体阳性、1例Anti-HIV阳性患者,以及9名极高危患者,共119例患者接受手术治疗.根据分值高低分为低危组(n=51)、中危组(n=45)和高危组(n=23),比较3组年龄构成、手术时间及术后临床指标.结果 3组患者年龄构成、手术及术后恢复临床效果指标比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).术中情况:3组患者手术持续时间[低危组(39.88±17.85) min,中危组(72.40±19.25) min,高危组(99.56±29.98) min]、平均出血量[低危组(21.96 ± 19.75) ml,中危组(61.56 ±24.19)ml,高危组(87.83±30.96) ml];实施全身麻醉的患者数(低危组2例,中危组11例,高危组l6例)组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).术后指标:3组患者围手术期发生高血压(低危组3例,中危组7例,高危组15例)、电解质紊乱(低危组1例,中危组4例,高危组7例)、术后首次下床时间[低危组(2.41±1.68)h,中危组(5.04±1.71)h,高危组(7.30±3.55) h]、平均住院时间[低危组(14.96±8.09)h,中危组(35.87±12.72)h,高危组(46.39±15.98) h]组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 快捷风险评估模式是保障医院船平台手术治疗安全有效的可行方法,对提高医院船救治效率、预防涉外医疗不良事件的发生有实用价值.
目的 探討在醫院船平檯應用快捷風險評估(fast risk assessment,FRA)模式行手術風險及早期預後評估的效果.方法 “和平方舟”醫院船2013年6月至10月海外醫療服務期間,前瞻性將131例前期篩查有手術指徵的外籍患者納入FRA流程,採用自製FRA錶進行術前評估.去除2例梅毒抗體暘性、1例Anti-HIV暘性患者,以及9名極高危患者,共119例患者接受手術治療.根據分值高低分為低危組(n=51)、中危組(n=45)和高危組(n=23),比較3組年齡構成、手術時間及術後臨床指標.結果 3組患者年齡構成、手術及術後恢複臨床效果指標比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).術中情況:3組患者手術持續時間[低危組(39.88±17.85) min,中危組(72.40±19.25) min,高危組(99.56±29.98) min]、平均齣血量[低危組(21.96 ± 19.75) ml,中危組(61.56 ±24.19)ml,高危組(87.83±30.96) ml];實施全身痳醉的患者數(低危組2例,中危組11例,高危組l6例)組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).術後指標:3組患者圍手術期髮生高血壓(低危組3例,中危組7例,高危組15例)、電解質紊亂(低危組1例,中危組4例,高危組7例)、術後首次下床時間[低危組(2.41±1.68)h,中危組(5.04±1.71)h,高危組(7.30±3.55) h]、平均住院時間[低危組(14.96±8.09)h,中危組(35.87±12.72)h,高危組(46.39±15.98) h]組間比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.01).結論 快捷風險評估模式是保障醫院船平檯手術治療安全有效的可行方法,對提高醫院船救治效率、預防涉外醫療不良事件的髮生有實用價值.
목적 탐토재의원선평태응용쾌첩풍험평고(fast risk assessment,FRA)모식행수술풍험급조기예후평고적효과.방법 “화평방주”의원선2013년6월지10월해외의료복무기간,전첨성장131례전기사사유수술지정적외적환자납입FRA류정,채용자제FRA표진행술전평고.거제2례매독항체양성、1례Anti-HIV양성환자,이급9명겁고위환자,공119례환자접수수술치료.근거분치고저분위저위조(n=51)、중위조(n=45)화고위조(n=23),비교3조년령구성、수술시간급술후림상지표.결과 3조환자년령구성、수술급술후회복림상효과지표비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).술중정황:3조환자수술지속시간[저위조(39.88±17.85) min,중위조(72.40±19.25) min,고위조(99.56±29.98) min]、평균출혈량[저위조(21.96 ± 19.75) ml,중위조(61.56 ±24.19)ml,고위조(87.83±30.96) ml];실시전신마취적환자수(저위조2례,중위조11례,고위조l6례)조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).술후지표:3조환자위수술기발생고혈압(저위조3례,중위조7례,고위조15례)、전해질문란(저위조1례,중위조4례,고위조7례)、술후수차하상시간[저위조(2.41±1.68)h,중위조(5.04±1.71)h,고위조(7.30±3.55) h]、평균주원시간[저위조(14.96±8.09)h,중위조(35.87±12.72)h,고위조(46.39±15.98) h]조간비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.01).결론 쾌첩풍험평고모식시보장의원선평태수술치료안전유효적가행방법,대제고의원선구치효솔、예방섭외의료불량사건적발생유실용개치.
Objective To explore the value of fast risk assessment (FRA) to evaluate surgical risks and predict early prognosis aboard the hospital ship.Methods During the overseas medical service from June to October,2013,"Ark Peace" prospectively put 131 clinical foreign patients with surgical indications on the FRA procedures,and FRA assessment scale was used to make pre-surgical evaluations.With the exclusion of 2 cases of syphilis-antibody positive,one case of Anti-HIV positive and 9 high risk patients,119 patients received surgical treatment.In accordance with the scores,119 post-surgical patients were divided into the lower risk group (n =51),the moderate risk group (n =45) and the high risk group (n =23).Then,therapeutic effects were compared in terms of age composition,surgery and recovery after surgery between the 3 groups.Results Statistical significance could be seen,when comparisons were made in age composition,surgery and recovery after surgery between the 3 groups(P <0.01).With respect to surgical data,statistical significance could be seen in the length of surgery,average amount of bleeding and the number of cases performed with general anesthesia,when comparisons were made between the 3 groups(P < 0.01).With respect to post-surgical data,statistical significance could also be seen in the following during the peri-operative period:the incidence of hypertension,electrolyte disturbance,the first time to get out of bed and average length of stay in the hospital,when comparisons were made between the 3 groups (P < 0.01).Conclusions Fast risk assessment was an effective and safe method to ensure surgical treatment aboard the hospital ship.It was of practical value for the promotion of medical care and the prevention of adverse medical events concerning foreign patients aboard hospital ship.