中华核医学与分子影像杂志
中華覈醫學與分子影像雜誌
중화핵의학여분자영상잡지
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2014年
5期
354-357
,共4页
李燕%杨敏福%高晓津%赵世华%杨跃进
李燕%楊敏福%高曉津%趙世華%楊躍進
리연%양민복%고효진%조세화%양약진
孤立性心肌致密化不全%体层摄影术,发射型计算机,单光子%磁共振成像%MIBI
孤立性心肌緻密化不全%體層攝影術,髮射型計算機,單光子%磁共振成像%MIBI
고립성심기치밀화불전%체층섭영술,발사형계산궤,단광자%자공진성상%MIBI
Isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium%Tomography,emission-computed,single-photon%Magnetic resonance imaging%MIBI
目的 分析孤立性左心室心肌致密化不全(ILVNC)患者的心肌灌注受损情况,及其与心脏MRI结果之间的关系.方法 前瞻性入选19例(男14例,女5例,年龄15 ~ 76岁)经心脏MRI确诊的ILVNC患者,同期行99Tcm-MIBI SPECT MPI.采用标准的17节段法分析MRI及SPECT图像.计算MRI所示各节段心肌非致密层(NC)与致密层(C)厚度比值(NC/C),NC/C>2.3者诊断为心肌致密化不全.计算并比较致密不全节段和致密化节段延迟强化(DE)出现率及心肌灌注异常的出现率.两样本率的比较采用x2检验;lgLVEF(LVEF由MRI测定)和心肌灌注受损节段数、致密化不全节段数和DE节段数的关系采用Pearson或Spearman法分析.结果 19例患者中16例(84.2%) MPI出现灌注受损;MRI示19例共有致密化不全节段107个和致密化节段216个,灌注异常出现率分别为33.6%(36/107)和31.9%(69/216),差异无统计学意义(x2=0.09,P>0.05).共31个节段出现DE,致密化不全节段和致密化节段DE出现率分别为5.6%(6/107)和11.6% (25/216),差异也没有统计学意义(x2=2.94,P>0.05).DE节段灌注异常出现率高于非DE节段[54.8%(17/31)与30.1%(88/292);x2=7.80,P<0.01].lgLVEF与致密化不全节段数、DE节段数、灌注受累节段数间相关系数均无统计学意义(r=-0.35、0.15和-0.34,均P>0.05).结论 大部分ILVNC患者存在不同程度的心肌血流灌注受损,MRI所示致密化不全和非致密化不全心肌均可出现;心肌灌注受损在该病的发生及进展中的作用尚需进一步研究.
目的 分析孤立性左心室心肌緻密化不全(ILVNC)患者的心肌灌註受損情況,及其與心髒MRI結果之間的關繫.方法 前瞻性入選19例(男14例,女5例,年齡15 ~ 76歲)經心髒MRI確診的ILVNC患者,同期行99Tcm-MIBI SPECT MPI.採用標準的17節段法分析MRI及SPECT圖像.計算MRI所示各節段心肌非緻密層(NC)與緻密層(C)厚度比值(NC/C),NC/C>2.3者診斷為心肌緻密化不全.計算併比較緻密不全節段和緻密化節段延遲彊化(DE)齣現率及心肌灌註異常的齣現率.兩樣本率的比較採用x2檢驗;lgLVEF(LVEF由MRI測定)和心肌灌註受損節段數、緻密化不全節段數和DE節段數的關繫採用Pearson或Spearman法分析.結果 19例患者中16例(84.2%) MPI齣現灌註受損;MRI示19例共有緻密化不全節段107箇和緻密化節段216箇,灌註異常齣現率分彆為33.6%(36/107)和31.9%(69/216),差異無統計學意義(x2=0.09,P>0.05).共31箇節段齣現DE,緻密化不全節段和緻密化節段DE齣現率分彆為5.6%(6/107)和11.6% (25/216),差異也沒有統計學意義(x2=2.94,P>0.05).DE節段灌註異常齣現率高于非DE節段[54.8%(17/31)與30.1%(88/292);x2=7.80,P<0.01].lgLVEF與緻密化不全節段數、DE節段數、灌註受纍節段數間相關繫數均無統計學意義(r=-0.35、0.15和-0.34,均P>0.05).結論 大部分ILVNC患者存在不同程度的心肌血流灌註受損,MRI所示緻密化不全和非緻密化不全心肌均可齣現;心肌灌註受損在該病的髮生及進展中的作用尚需進一步研究.
목적 분석고립성좌심실심기치밀화불전(ILVNC)환자적심기관주수손정황,급기여심장MRI결과지간적관계.방법 전첨성입선19례(남14례,녀5례,년령15 ~ 76세)경심장MRI학진적ILVNC환자,동기행99Tcm-MIBI SPECT MPI.채용표준적17절단법분석MRI급SPECT도상.계산MRI소시각절단심기비치밀층(NC)여치밀층(C)후도비치(NC/C),NC/C>2.3자진단위심기치밀화불전.계산병비교치밀불전절단화치밀화절단연지강화(DE)출현솔급심기관주이상적출현솔.량양본솔적비교채용x2검험;lgLVEF(LVEF유MRI측정)화심기관주수손절단수、치밀화불전절단수화DE절단수적관계채용Pearson혹Spearman법분석.결과 19례환자중16례(84.2%) MPI출현관주수손;MRI시19례공유치밀화불전절단107개화치밀화절단216개,관주이상출현솔분별위33.6%(36/107)화31.9%(69/216),차이무통계학의의(x2=0.09,P>0.05).공31개절단출현DE,치밀화불전절단화치밀화절단DE출현솔분별위5.6%(6/107)화11.6% (25/216),차이야몰유통계학의의(x2=2.94,P>0.05).DE절단관주이상출현솔고우비DE절단[54.8%(17/31)여30.1%(88/292);x2=7.80,P<0.01].lgLVEF여치밀화불전절단수、DE절단수、관주수루절단수간상관계수균무통계학의의(r=-0.35、0.15화-0.34,균P>0.05).결론 대부분ILVNC환자존재불동정도적심기혈류관주수손,MRI소시치밀화불전화비치밀화불전심기균가출현;심기관주수손재해병적발생급진전중적작용상수진일보연구.
Objective To investigate the myocardial perfusion abnormalities in patients with isolated left ventricular noncompaction (ILVNC) and analyze the correlation between MPI and MRI.Methods Nineteen patients (14 males,5 females,age range:15-76 years) with ILVNC diagnosed by cardiac MRI were recruited.All patients underwent 99Tcm-MIBI MPI.Both MPI and cardiac MRI were analyzed using a 17-segment model.The thickness ratio of the non-compacted to compacted layers of myocardium (NC/C) was calculated,and segments with NC/C>2.3 were considered as noncompaction.The incidences of delayed enhancement (DE) and myocardial perfusion abnormalities in non-compacted segments and compacted segments were calculated.x2 test was used for categorical data.The Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient were used to assess the relationship between the numbers of myocardial segments with myocardial perfusion abnormalities/noncompaction/DE and lgLVEF.Results Of 19 patients,myocardial perfusion abnormality was found in 16 (84.2%) patients.The incidences of perfusion abnormality were 33.6% (36/107) in non-compacted segments and 31.9% (69/216) in compacted segments,respectively (x2=0.09,P>0.05).There were 31 segments with DE.The incidences of DE were 5.6% (6/107) in non-compacted segments and 11.6% (25/216) in compacted segments,respectively (x2 =2.94,P>0.05).The incidence of reduced perfusion was higher in segments with DE than those in segments without DE (54.8% (17/31) vs 30.1% (88/292) ; x2 =7.80,P<0.01).The lgLVEF and the numbers of myocardial segments with noncompaction/DE/myocardial perfusion abnormalities were not correlated(r=-0.35,0.15,-0.34,all P>0.05).Conclusion Most patients with ILVNC have myocardial perfusion abnormality,which can be observed both in non-compacted and compacted myocardium.Further research is required to elucidate the role of myocardial perfusion abnormality in ILVNC.