中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2013年
8期
449-452
,共4页
陈立%谭建国%刘明月%周建锋%刘晓强
陳立%譚建國%劉明月%週建鋒%劉曉彊
진립%담건국%류명월%주건봉%류효강
牙%色%比色板%覆盖误差
牙%色%比色闆%覆蓋誤差
아%색%비색판%복개오차
Tooth%Color%Shade guide%Coverage error
目的 比较5种比色板对天然前牙颜色的覆盖误差,以期为临床提供参考.方法 用比色仪(Crystaleye)测量310颗天然前牙的颜色,并用配套软件对天然牙及内置5种比色板A(VITA Classical)、B(VITA 3D-Master)、C(Chromascop)、D(Shofu Vintage Halo NCC)和E(Noritake)的颜色进行分析,计算比色板与天然牙各部分颜色的色差,使用单因素方差分析和Tukey法比较各比色板对天然牙颜色覆盖误差的差异.结果 牙颈部颜色覆盖误差比色板A(3.09 ±0.97)最大,比色板D(1.62±0.75)最小;牙中部颜色覆盖误差比色板B(1.65±0.64)和比色板D(1.52 ±0.74)显著小于比色板A(2.04 ±0.80)、C(2.04 ±0.90)、E(2.02 ±0.84) (P <0.05),比色板B、D间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);牙切端颜色覆盖误差各比色板均小于2.00,比色板A(1.81 ±0.86)最大,比色板D(1.28±0.55)最小.结论 比色板D在牙齿颈部、中部、切端三部分均能更好地覆盖天然牙的颜色.
目的 比較5種比色闆對天然前牙顏色的覆蓋誤差,以期為臨床提供參攷.方法 用比色儀(Crystaleye)測量310顆天然前牙的顏色,併用配套軟件對天然牙及內置5種比色闆A(VITA Classical)、B(VITA 3D-Master)、C(Chromascop)、D(Shofu Vintage Halo NCC)和E(Noritake)的顏色進行分析,計算比色闆與天然牙各部分顏色的色差,使用單因素方差分析和Tukey法比較各比色闆對天然牙顏色覆蓋誤差的差異.結果 牙頸部顏色覆蓋誤差比色闆A(3.09 ±0.97)最大,比色闆D(1.62±0.75)最小;牙中部顏色覆蓋誤差比色闆B(1.65±0.64)和比色闆D(1.52 ±0.74)顯著小于比色闆A(2.04 ±0.80)、C(2.04 ±0.90)、E(2.02 ±0.84) (P <0.05),比色闆B、D間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);牙切耑顏色覆蓋誤差各比色闆均小于2.00,比色闆A(1.81 ±0.86)最大,比色闆D(1.28±0.55)最小.結論 比色闆D在牙齒頸部、中部、切耑三部分均能更好地覆蓋天然牙的顏色.
목적 비교5충비색판대천연전아안색적복개오차,이기위림상제공삼고.방법 용비색의(Crystaleye)측량310과천연전아적안색,병용배투연건대천연아급내치5충비색판A(VITA Classical)、B(VITA 3D-Master)、C(Chromascop)、D(Shofu Vintage Halo NCC)화E(Noritake)적안색진행분석,계산비색판여천연아각부분안색적색차,사용단인소방차분석화Tukey법비교각비색판대천연아안색복개오차적차이.결과 아경부안색복개오차비색판A(3.09 ±0.97)최대,비색판D(1.62±0.75)최소;아중부안색복개오차비색판B(1.65±0.64)화비색판D(1.52 ±0.74)현저소우비색판A(2.04 ±0.80)、C(2.04 ±0.90)、E(2.02 ±0.84) (P <0.05),비색판B、D간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);아절단안색복개오차각비색판균소우2.00,비색판A(1.81 ±0.86)최대,비색판D(1.28±0.55)최소.결론 비색판D재아치경부、중부、절단삼부분균능경호지복개천연아적안색.
Objective To compare the coverage errors (CE)of five different shade guides in anterio vital natural teeth of selected people.Methods Anterior vital natural teeth were measured with Crystaleye spectrophotometer,color coordinates of the teeth and five shade guides A (VITA Classical),B (VITA 3D-Master),C (Chromascop),D (Shofu Vintage Halo NCC) and E (Noritake)were analyzed with the supporting software.The CE of the five shade guide systems to natural teeth were evaluated in cervical,body and incisal regions,and difference in CE among shade guides was determined.Results In the cervical region,shade guide A had the maximal CE value (3.09 ±0.97) and shade guide D had the minimal CE value (1.62 ± 0.75).In the body region,CE of shade guide B (1.65 ± 0.64) and shade guide D (1.52 ± 0.74) were lower than those of shade guides A (2.04 ± 0.80),C (2.04 ± 0.90) and E (2.02 ± 0.84) (P < 0.05).In the incisal part,all CE were below 2.00,and again shade guide A had the maximal CE value (1.81 ± 0.86) and shade guide D had the minimal CE value (1.28 ± 0.55).Conclusions Within the limitation of the study,shade guide D had better color coverage of natural teeth in cervical,body and incisal regions.