中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2014年
3期
161-165
,共5页
林盛筱%冯源%解涓%宋应亮%谢超%李德华
林盛篠%馮源%解涓%宋應亮%謝超%李德華
림성소%풍원%해연%송응량%사초%리덕화
牙种植体%上颌窦底提升%存留率
牙種植體%上頜竇底提升%存留率
아충식체%상합두저제승%존류솔
Dental implants%Maxillary sinus floor augmentation%Survival rate
目的 总结冲压法上颌窦底提升同期牙种植体植入后5年的临床疗效,为提高手术远期疗提供数据.方法 收集2005年1月至2009年12月行冲压法上颌窦底提升同期种植、同一术者的连续临床病例.收集术前计划行冲压法上颌窦底提升患者共94例,男性55例,女性39例,平均年龄(46.9±11.8)岁.完成冲压法上颌窦底提升者共90例(96侧上颌窦),同期植人种植体126枚.患者术前拍摄曲面体层X线片,术后、功能负载后以及每年复诊时拍摄根尖X线片及曲面体层X线片,评价种植体存留率、边缘骨吸收情况,并观察上颌窦底新骨改建情况.结果 术中有4例上颌窦底黏膜穿孔,黏膜穿孔率为3.08% (4/130);愈合期内4枚种植体脱落,种植体早期成功率为96.80%(121/125).功能负载后患者随访率为72.09%(62/86),种植体随访率75.00%(90/120),随访时间(34.4±20.4)个月,随访中所有种植体功能行使良好,种植体功能负载后累积存留率为100.00%.愈合期内种植体周围边缘骨吸收(0.75 ±0.51) mm,随访期内边缘骨吸收(0.48±0.41) mm.种植体植入位置剩余骨高度(7.27±1.30) mm;术后种植体突入上颌窦内高度为(2.77 ±1.15) mm;上颌窦底提升高度为(4.52士1.39)mm;经过(7.4±2.6)个月的愈合期,上颌窦底新骨形成高度为(3.81±1.60) mm.在经历(34.4±20.4)个月的随访期后,上颌窦底新骨高度较功能负载时降低了0.37(0.10,0.88) mm.结论 冲压法上颌窦底提升同期牙种植体植入术安全可靠,术后影像学证实获得了良好的上颌窦底提升及成骨效果,上颌窦底新骨高度在远期随访中略有降低.
目的 總結遲壓法上頜竇底提升同期牙種植體植入後5年的臨床療效,為提高手術遠期療提供數據.方法 收集2005年1月至2009年12月行遲壓法上頜竇底提升同期種植、同一術者的連續臨床病例.收集術前計劃行遲壓法上頜竇底提升患者共94例,男性55例,女性39例,平均年齡(46.9±11.8)歲.完成遲壓法上頜竇底提升者共90例(96側上頜竇),同期植人種植體126枚.患者術前拍攝麯麵體層X線片,術後、功能負載後以及每年複診時拍攝根尖X線片及麯麵體層X線片,評價種植體存留率、邊緣骨吸收情況,併觀察上頜竇底新骨改建情況.結果 術中有4例上頜竇底黏膜穿孔,黏膜穿孔率為3.08% (4/130);愈閤期內4枚種植體脫落,種植體早期成功率為96.80%(121/125).功能負載後患者隨訪率為72.09%(62/86),種植體隨訪率75.00%(90/120),隨訪時間(34.4±20.4)箇月,隨訪中所有種植體功能行使良好,種植體功能負載後纍積存留率為100.00%.愈閤期內種植體週圍邊緣骨吸收(0.75 ±0.51) mm,隨訪期內邊緣骨吸收(0.48±0.41) mm.種植體植入位置剩餘骨高度(7.27±1.30) mm;術後種植體突入上頜竇內高度為(2.77 ±1.15) mm;上頜竇底提升高度為(4.52士1.39)mm;經過(7.4±2.6)箇月的愈閤期,上頜竇底新骨形成高度為(3.81±1.60) mm.在經歷(34.4±20.4)箇月的隨訪期後,上頜竇底新骨高度較功能負載時降低瞭0.37(0.10,0.88) mm.結論 遲壓法上頜竇底提升同期牙種植體植入術安全可靠,術後影像學證實穫得瞭良好的上頜竇底提升及成骨效果,上頜竇底新骨高度在遠期隨訪中略有降低.
목적 총결충압법상합두저제승동기아충식체식입후5년적림상료효,위제고수술원기료제공수거.방법 수집2005년1월지2009년12월행충압법상합두저제승동기충식、동일술자적련속림상병례.수집술전계화행충압법상합두저제승환자공94례,남성55례,녀성39례,평균년령(46.9±11.8)세.완성충압법상합두저제승자공90례(96측상합두),동기식인충식체126매.환자술전박섭곡면체층X선편,술후、공능부재후이급매년복진시박섭근첨X선편급곡면체층X선편,평개충식체존류솔、변연골흡수정황,병관찰상합두저신골개건정황.결과 술중유4례상합두저점막천공,점막천공솔위3.08% (4/130);유합기내4매충식체탈락,충식체조기성공솔위96.80%(121/125).공능부재후환자수방솔위72.09%(62/86),충식체수방솔75.00%(90/120),수방시간(34.4±20.4)개월,수방중소유충식체공능행사량호,충식체공능부재후루적존류솔위100.00%.유합기내충식체주위변연골흡수(0.75 ±0.51) mm,수방기내변연골흡수(0.48±0.41) mm.충식체식입위치잉여골고도(7.27±1.30) mm;술후충식체돌입상합두내고도위(2.77 ±1.15) mm;상합두저제승고도위(4.52사1.39)mm;경과(7.4±2.6)개월적유합기,상합두저신골형성고도위(3.81±1.60) mm.재경력(34.4±20.4)개월적수방기후,상합두저신골고도교공능부재시강저료0.37(0.10,0.88) mm.결론 충압법상합두저제승동기아충식체식입술안전가고,술후영상학증실획득료량호적상합두저제승급성골효과,상합두저신골고도재원기수방중략유강저.
Objective To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of placing dental implants in the posterior maxilla using the transalveolar technique.Methods Between January 2005 and December 2009,a total of 94 cases,55 males and 39 females,aged (46.9 ± 11.8) years,were consecutively enrolled in this study with maxillary sinus floor augmentation using the transalveolar technique.Radiographic evaluations were conducted on panoramic and periapical radiographs at each recall.The follow-up clinical examination included cumulative survival rate(CSR) of implants,peri-implant marginal bone loss(MBL) and the height of sinus floor augmentation and the endo-sinus bone gain(ESBG).Results Sinus membrane perforation was found in 4 cases.Finally 126 implants (90 cases) were placed.The perforation rate of this surgical procedure was 3.08% (4/130).Four implants lost during the healing time,the early success of implants was 96.80% (121/125).During a mean follow-up time of (34.4 ± 20.4) months,all the implants were successfully in function,with the cumulative survival rate after function loading of 100.00%.The mean MBL was (0.75 ± 0.51) mm during the healing time,and (0.48 ±0.41) mm during the follow-up period.The mean residual bone height(RBH) was (7.27 ± 1.30) mm at the position of implants placement,the length of implant protruding into the sinus was (2.77-± 1.15) mm,and the height of sinus floor augmentation was (4.52 ± 1.39) mm.At the loading time,the mean endo-sinus bone gain was (3.81 ± 1.60) mm.After the follow-up time of 34 months,the newly formed bone on the maxillary sinus floor underwent further remodeling with a median bone reduction value of 0.37 (0.10,0.88) mm.Conclusions Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using the transalveolar technique is a predictable treatment modality.The augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor using the transalveolar technique could lead to bone formation under the sinus.The newly formed bone showed slight absorbtion in the long term follow-up.