中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2014年
9期
545-548
,共4页
邢文忠%蒋滔%陈小冬%王贻宁
邢文忠%蔣滔%陳小鼕%王貽寧
형문충%장도%진소동%왕이저
颜色%复合树脂%漂白剂%色差
顏色%複閤樹脂%漂白劑%色差
안색%복합수지%표백제%색차
Color%Composite resin%Bleaching agent%Color difference
目的 评价漂白对复合树脂颜色的影响,为临床提供参考.方法 选用2种间接修复复合树脂(Adoro SR和Ceramage)和3种直接充填复合树脂(Filtek Z350、Gradia Direct Anterior、Clearfil Majesty Esthetic).每种树脂制作20个试样(直径10 mm、厚1.0 mm),查询随机数字表随机分为5个组(每组样本量为4),分别使用2种家庭漂白剂(10%和15%过氧化脲)、2种诊室漂白剂(38%过氧化氢和35%过氧化氢)以及去离子水(空白对照组)处理.使用光谱扫描色度仪测量处理前后试样的色度值,计算彩度值和色差值.结果 家庭漂白或诊室漂白前后所有树脂试样的色差值均小于2.0,为肉眼不可察觉.与空白对照组相比,漂白后各组试样均表现为明度值(L*)轻度增加、彩度值(C*ah)下降.双因素方差分析显示,漂白剂种类和复合树脂种类对试样漂白前后色差值有影响(P=0.001).结论 本项实验条件下,漂白处理未能影响复合树脂的颜色.
目的 評價漂白對複閤樹脂顏色的影響,為臨床提供參攷.方法 選用2種間接脩複複閤樹脂(Adoro SR和Ceramage)和3種直接充填複閤樹脂(Filtek Z350、Gradia Direct Anterior、Clearfil Majesty Esthetic).每種樹脂製作20箇試樣(直徑10 mm、厚1.0 mm),查詢隨機數字錶隨機分為5箇組(每組樣本量為4),分彆使用2種傢庭漂白劑(10%和15%過氧化脲)、2種診室漂白劑(38%過氧化氫和35%過氧化氫)以及去離子水(空白對照組)處理.使用光譜掃描色度儀測量處理前後試樣的色度值,計算綵度值和色差值.結果 傢庭漂白或診室漂白前後所有樹脂試樣的色差值均小于2.0,為肉眼不可察覺.與空白對照組相比,漂白後各組試樣均錶現為明度值(L*)輕度增加、綵度值(C*ah)下降.雙因素方差分析顯示,漂白劑種類和複閤樹脂種類對試樣漂白前後色差值有影響(P=0.001).結論 本項實驗條件下,漂白處理未能影響複閤樹脂的顏色.
목적 평개표백대복합수지안색적영향,위림상제공삼고.방법 선용2충간접수복복합수지(Adoro SR화Ceramage)화3충직접충전복합수지(Filtek Z350、Gradia Direct Anterior、Clearfil Majesty Esthetic).매충수지제작20개시양(직경10 mm、후1.0 mm),사순수궤수자표수궤분위5개조(매조양본량위4),분별사용2충가정표백제(10%화15%과양화뇨)、2충진실표백제(38%과양화경화35%과양화경)이급거리자수(공백대조조)처리.사용광보소묘색도의측량처리전후시양적색도치,계산채도치화색차치.결과 가정표백혹진실표백전후소유수지시양적색차치균소우2.0,위육안불가찰각.여공백대조조상비,표백후각조시양균표현위명도치(L*)경도증가、채도치(C*ah)하강.쌍인소방차분석현시,표백제충류화복합수지충류대시양표백전후색차치유영향(P=0.001).결론 본항실험조건하,표백처리미능영향복합수지적안색.
Objective To evaluate the effect of bleaching agents on the color of indirect and direct composite resins.Methods Five resin composite materials were tested in this in vitro study.The five composites were as follow:two indirect composite resins (Adoro SR,Ceramage) and three direct composite resins (Filtek Z350,Clearfil Majesty Esthetic,and Gradia Direct Anterior).For each material,twenty disk-shaped specimens were prepared and randomly divided into five groups according to the color parameters of specimens before bleaching treatment.The composite resin specimens were treated by one of five sample solutions which were at-home bleaching agents (10% and 15% carbarmide peroxide),in-office bleaching agents (38% H2O2 and 35% H2O2) and deionized water (control group).The color parameters of specimens were measured by spectrophotometer at baseline and after bleaching treatments.The color differences (ΔE values) between baseline and post-treatments were calculated.The data of color differences were evaluated statistically using two-way analysis with a significance level of 0.05.Results The color changes of the resin composites were less than 2.0 after bleaching agent treatment,therefore were not perceptible.Slight increase of L* values and decrease of C*ab values in color parameters of specimens were observed.There were statistically significant differences in ΔE values for different bleaching treatments and resin materials(P=0.001).Conclusions The bleaching agents did not affect the color of indirect and direct composite resins tested.