中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中華勞動衛生職業病雜誌
중화노동위생직업병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
2013年
9期
671-674
,共4页
王晓华%刘东声%宣晓%康涵%段江晖%袁慧书
王曉華%劉東聲%宣曉%康涵%段江暉%袁慧書
왕효화%류동성%선효%강함%단강휘%원혜서
管电压%体模,显象术%放射摄影术,数字
管電壓%體模,顯象術%放射攝影術,數字
관전압%체모,현상술%방사섭영술,수자
Tube voltage%Phantoms,imaging%Radiolography,digital
目的 探讨不同管电压下对比度细节体模(CDRAD2.0)及职业性接尘者数字化X线胸片(DR)的图像质量.方法 对CDRAD2.0体模进行高仟伏及不同管电压的DR成像,由3位阅片者对其图像进行分析,计算并比较影像质量因子(IQF);同时选择136例粉尘作业人员,拍摄高仟伏X线胸片和不同管电压下的DR片,参照高仟伏胸片分别对DR片的10个解剖部位进行评分,比较DR与高仟伏图像间的差异.结果 在CDRAD2.0体模中,3位阅片者DR图像的IQF值均在120 kV条件下达到最小,平均IQF值为22.25.经随机效应模型的方差分析,不同管电压下的DR图像的平均IQF值的差异有统计学意义(F=13.775,P<0.01).120 kV的DR图像与高仟伏图像IQF均值的差异无统计学意义(t=-0.58,P=0.979).在接尘者中,120 kV投照条件下的DR图像对解剖情况的显示最接近高仟伏模拟图像,均值与0(基本等同于高仟伏片)的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在CDRAD2.0体模或接尘者中,120kV管电压下的DR图像质量基本等同于高仟伏片.
目的 探討不同管電壓下對比度細節體模(CDRAD2.0)及職業性接塵者數字化X線胸片(DR)的圖像質量.方法 對CDRAD2.0體模進行高仟伏及不同管電壓的DR成像,由3位閱片者對其圖像進行分析,計算併比較影像質量因子(IQF);同時選擇136例粉塵作業人員,拍攝高仟伏X線胸片和不同管電壓下的DR片,參照高仟伏胸片分彆對DR片的10箇解剖部位進行評分,比較DR與高仟伏圖像間的差異.結果 在CDRAD2.0體模中,3位閱片者DR圖像的IQF值均在120 kV條件下達到最小,平均IQF值為22.25.經隨機效應模型的方差分析,不同管電壓下的DR圖像的平均IQF值的差異有統計學意義(F=13.775,P<0.01).120 kV的DR圖像與高仟伏圖像IQF均值的差異無統計學意義(t=-0.58,P=0.979).在接塵者中,120 kV投照條件下的DR圖像對解剖情況的顯示最接近高仟伏模擬圖像,均值與0(基本等同于高仟伏片)的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 在CDRAD2.0體模或接塵者中,120kV管電壓下的DR圖像質量基本等同于高仟伏片.
목적 탐토불동관전압하대비도세절체모(CDRAD2.0)급직업성접진자수자화X선흉편(DR)적도상질량.방법 대CDRAD2.0체모진행고천복급불동관전압적DR성상,유3위열편자대기도상진행분석,계산병비교영상질량인자(IQF);동시선택136례분진작업인원,박섭고천복X선흉편화불동관전압하적DR편,삼조고천복흉편분별대DR편적10개해부부위진행평분,비교DR여고천복도상간적차이.결과 재CDRAD2.0체모중,3위열편자DR도상적IQF치균재120 kV조건하체도최소,평균IQF치위22.25.경수궤효응모형적방차분석,불동관전압하적DR도상적평균IQF치적차이유통계학의의(F=13.775,P<0.01).120 kV적DR도상여고천복도상IQF균치적차이무통계학의의(t=-0.58,P=0.979).재접진자중,120 kV투조조건하적DR도상대해부정황적현시최접근고천복모의도상,균치여0(기본등동우고천복편)적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 재CDRAD2.0체모혹접진자중,120kV관전압하적DR도상질량기본등동우고천복편.
Objective To explore the image quality of different tube voltage on digital chest radiograph for contrast detail phantom (CDRAD2.0) and occupational exposed workers.Methods The CDRAD2.0 phantom DR images of high KV and different tube voltages were analyzed by 3 readers,image quality figure (IQF) were calculated and compared ;at the same time 136 exposed workers were examined with high-kV and DR chest radiograph of different tube voltages.Contrast to high-KV images,10 anatomic sites were scored.The image differences were compared between DR and high-kV.Results On CDRAD2.0 phantom,the IQF value of DR images in 3 readers were minimum in the condition of 120 kV,average value was 22.25.The analysis of variance in model with random effects,the mean IQF value of different tube voltage DR image had a significant difference (F=13.775,P<0.01) ;By Dunnett t-tests analysis,the mean IQF value of DR image in 120 kV and high kilovoltage had no difference (t=-0.58,P=0.979); On clinical cases,the DR image of 120 kV showed the closest anatomy to the high KV,the mean had no significant difference with 0 (P>0.05) with single sample t test.Conclusion On the CDRAD2.0 phantom or clinical exposed workers,the DR image quality of 120 kV tube voltage equals to high-KV basically.