CAJ | 학술논문

目的评价国内老年医学杂志发表的Meta分析文献质量. 方法检索2013年11月21日前发表于国内9本主要老年医学期刊上的老年医学Meta分析,收集待评价文献的基本信息,采用系统评价和Meta分析文献规范(PRISMA)量表进行评价. 结果共纳入71篇文献,其中《老年医学与保健》1篇,《实用老年医学》1篇,《中国老年保健医学》10篇,《中国老年学杂志》45篇,《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》3篇,《中华老年口腔医学杂志》1篇,《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》5篇,《中华老年医学杂志》5篇.其中近3年发表文献55篇(77.5％),平均作者数为(4.61±2.25)名,作者主要来自医院55名(77.5％),多单位合作文献占22.5％(16篇),有基金资助文献占31.0％(22篇).PRISMA量表评分最高24分,最低4分,平均(16.75±3.04)分.发表时间距今年限(β'=-0.342,P=0.003)是Meta分析报告质量主要影响因素. 结论近年来发表在老年医学期刊上的Meta分析文章数量和质量均逐渐上升,但仍存在一些书写规范上的问题.应推广PRISMA评价量表,规范报告格式,提高老年医学领域内Meta分析文献的质量.
목적 평개국내노년의학잡지발표적Meta분석문헌질량. 방법 검색2013년11월21일전발표우국내9본주요노년의학기간상적노년의학Meta분석,수집대평개문헌적기본신식,채용계통평개화Meta분석문헌규범(PRISMA)량표진행평개. 결과 공납입71편문헌,기중《노년의학여보건》1편,《실용노년의학》1편,《중국노년보건의학》10편,《중국노년학잡지》45편,《중화노년다기관질병잡지》3편,《중화노년구강의학잡지》1편,《중화노년심뇌혈관병잡지》5편,《중화노년의학잡지》5편.기중근3년발표문헌55편(77.5％),평균작자수위(4.61±2.25)명,작자주요래자의원55명(77.5％),다단위합작문헌점22.5％(16편),유기금자조문헌점31.0％(22편).PRISMA량표평분최고24분,최저4분,평균(16.75±3.04)분.발표시간거금년한(β'=-0.342,P=0.003)시Meta분석보고질량주요영향인소. 결론 근년래발표재노년의학기간상적Meta분석문장수량화질량균축점상승,단잉존재일사서사규범상적문제.응추엄PRISMA평개량표,규범보고격식,제고노년의학영역내Meta분석문헌적질량.
Objective To evaluate the reporting quality of Meta-analyses published on Chinese journals of geriatrics.Methods Papers of Meta-analyses on geriatrics published in nine major Chinese journals of geriatrics before November 21,2013 were retrieved,their basic information were abstracted and evaluated through system assessment and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement.Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS17.0 software.Results Among the 71 internalized papers,1 was from 《Geriatrics & Health Care》,1 from 《Practical Geriatrics》,10 from 《Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care》,45 from 《Chinese Journal of Gerontology》,3 from 《Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly》,1 from 《Chinese Journal of Geriatric Dentistry》,5 from 《Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases》,5 from 《Chinese Journal of Geriatrics》.55 papers (77.5％) were published in recent 3 years.The mean overall PRISMA score was(16.75±3.04)ranged from 4 to 24.The main influencing factor for the quality of Meta-analyses was the year of publication (adjusted β=-0.342,P=0.003).Conclusions The quantity and quality of Meta-analyses published on Chinese journals of geriatrics are increased and improved in recent years,but there are still some problems on the writing norms.We should promote PRISMA statement and standardize reporting format to improve the quality of Meta-analyses in the field of geriatric medicine.