中华流行病学杂志
中華流行病學雜誌
중화류행병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
2013年
7期
701-705
,共5页
欧艳秋%聂志强%刘小清%麦劲壮%吴勇%高向民%庄建%陈寄梅
歐豔鞦%聶誌彊%劉小清%麥勁壯%吳勇%高嚮民%莊建%陳寄梅
구염추%섭지강%류소청%맥경장%오용%고향민%장건%진기매
先天性心脏病%危险因素%流动人口%常住人口
先天性心髒病%危險因素%流動人口%常住人口
선천성심장병%위험인소%류동인구%상주인구
Congenital heart defect%Risk factors%Floating population%Permanent resident
目的 研究流动人口与常住人口中先天性心脏病(CHD)危险因素的差异.方法 按病例对照研究方法,在界定的危险因素范围内,对流动和常住人口中各危险因素进行单因素及多因素非条件logistic(ENTER法)回归分析,并比较两人群调整后的危险因素种类和OR值.结果 入选流动人口病例855例,对照617例;常住人口病例1673例,对照1912例.流动人口特有的危险因素是孕母孕早期被动吸烟,特有的保护因素是家庭月收入高(≥1201元);常住人口特有的危险因素是孕母糖尿病、梅毒感染、住装修半年居室以及胎婴儿为巨大儿.孕母文化程度高在流动人口中为危险因素,在常住人口中是保护因素.产次、孕母孕早期病毒感染、孕母接触化学制剂、孕母异常生育史等因素的OR值在流动人口中高于常住人口;孕母孕早期发热、胎婴儿低体重的OR值在流动人口中低于常住人口.结论 流动和常住人口各自有CHD危险因素,多个危险因素在不同人群中的风险有明显差异.
目的 研究流動人口與常住人口中先天性心髒病(CHD)危險因素的差異.方法 按病例對照研究方法,在界定的危險因素範圍內,對流動和常住人口中各危險因素進行單因素及多因素非條件logistic(ENTER法)迴歸分析,併比較兩人群調整後的危險因素種類和OR值.結果 入選流動人口病例855例,對照617例;常住人口病例1673例,對照1912例.流動人口特有的危險因素是孕母孕早期被動吸煙,特有的保護因素是傢庭月收入高(≥1201元);常住人口特有的危險因素是孕母糖尿病、梅毒感染、住裝脩半年居室以及胎嬰兒為巨大兒.孕母文化程度高在流動人口中為危險因素,在常住人口中是保護因素.產次、孕母孕早期病毒感染、孕母接觸化學製劑、孕母異常生育史等因素的OR值在流動人口中高于常住人口;孕母孕早期髮熱、胎嬰兒低體重的OR值在流動人口中低于常住人口.結論 流動和常住人口各自有CHD危險因素,多箇危險因素在不同人群中的風險有明顯差異.
목적 연구류동인구여상주인구중선천성심장병(CHD)위험인소적차이.방법 안병례대조연구방법,재계정적위험인소범위내,대류동화상주인구중각위험인소진행단인소급다인소비조건logistic(ENTER법)회귀분석,병비교량인군조정후적위험인소충류화OR치.결과 입선류동인구병례855례,대조617례;상주인구병례1673례,대조1912례.류동인구특유적위험인소시잉모잉조기피동흡연,특유적보호인소시가정월수입고(≥1201원);상주인구특유적위험인소시잉모당뇨병、매독감염、주장수반년거실이급태영인위거대인.잉모문화정도고재류동인구중위위험인소,재상주인구중시보호인소.산차、잉모잉조기병독감염、잉모접촉화학제제、잉모이상생육사등인소적OR치재류동인구중고우상주인구;잉모잉조기발열、태영인저체중적OR치재류동인구중저우상주인구.결론 류동화상주인구각자유CHD위험인소,다개위험인소재불동인군중적풍험유명현차이.
Objective To analyze the differences of risk factors on congenital heart defect (CHD) between floating population and permanent residents in Guangdong.Methods A multicenter case-control study was carried out to investigate the risk factors of CHD in floating population and in permanent residents.Data was from 34 Guangdong CHD Monitoring Network centers during the year of 2004 to 2011.Exposed information related to the parents at pre-pregnancy and early pregnancy periods,was collected,using the same questionnaire survey methodology in the two populations.Possible risk factors were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate non-conditional logistic regression (ENTER method) methods.Risk factors were compared between the two populations.Results Totally,855 CHD cases and their controls from the floating population,as well as 1673 cases and their controls from the permanent residents were included in this study.Age of the children under study was defined from 28th week of gestation to 1 year old postnatal.In the floating population,specific risk factor for CHD appeared as:matemal passive smoking in early pregnancy,while the specific protective factor as high family income.However,the specific risk factors would include:having diseases as maternal diabetes mellitus or syphilis,living in a newly (within half a year) decorated house or with fetal macrosomia in the permanent residents.High education level showed as a risk factor in floating population,however contrarily,as protective factor to the permanent residents.Except for the factors related to having fever of the mother and infant with low birth weight,factors as having history of diliveries more than two,with maternal virus infection,exposure to chemical agent and negative bearing history etc.,have higher OR values in floating population than in the permanent residents.Conclusion Significant differences of risk factors for CHD were noticed between floating population and the permanent residents,which have their individual specific risk factors.Most of the ORs appeared higher in floating population than in the permanent residents.