中华流行病学杂志
中華流行病學雜誌
중화류행병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
2013年
10期
953-957
,共5页
董曼%张敬悬%卢传华%唐济生%刘兰芬%邱惠敏%王松波%王爱祯%李馨
董曼%張敬懸%盧傳華%唐濟生%劉蘭芬%邱惠敏%王鬆波%王愛禎%李馨
동만%장경현%로전화%당제생%류란분%구혜민%왕송파%왕애정%리형
焦虑障碍%生命质量%应对方式%病例对照研究
焦慮障礙%生命質量%應對方式%病例對照研究
초필장애%생명질량%응대방식%병례대조연구
Anxiety disorder%Life quality%Coping style%Case-control study
目的 采用病例对照方法探讨焦虑障碍患者生命质量和应对方式特点.方法 对山东省≥18岁人群精神障碍流行病学调查数据进行二次分析,以符合DSM-Ⅳ诊断的720例焦虑障碍患者作为研究组,按同性别、同年龄组(±3岁)、同村或同社区1∶1配对,在数据库中选择720名无任何精神疾病诊断者作为正常对照组.研究工具采用一般健康问卷、生命质量量表、简易应对方式问卷和一般资料调查问卷.结果 焦虑障碍患者的生命质量评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).应对方式中焦虑障碍患者消极应对因子评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).两因素方差分析显示,在排除性别、年龄、职业、受教育年限、婚姻状况、宗教信仰因素的影响后,焦虑障碍患者的生命质量评分仍低于对照组,消极应对因子评分仍高于对照组.结论 焦虑障碍患者生命质量低于正常对照组,且多采用消极应对方式.
目的 採用病例對照方法探討焦慮障礙患者生命質量和應對方式特點.方法 對山東省≥18歲人群精神障礙流行病學調查數據進行二次分析,以符閤DSM-Ⅳ診斷的720例焦慮障礙患者作為研究組,按同性彆、同年齡組(±3歲)、同村或同社區1∶1配對,在數據庫中選擇720名無任何精神疾病診斷者作為正常對照組.研究工具採用一般健康問捲、生命質量量錶、簡易應對方式問捲和一般資料調查問捲.結果 焦慮障礙患者的生命質量評分低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).應對方式中焦慮障礙患者消極應對因子評分高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).兩因素方差分析顯示,在排除性彆、年齡、職業、受教育年限、婚姻狀況、宗教信仰因素的影響後,焦慮障礙患者的生命質量評分仍低于對照組,消極應對因子評分仍高于對照組.結論 焦慮障礙患者生命質量低于正常對照組,且多採用消極應對方式.
목적 채용병례대조방법탐토초필장애환자생명질량화응대방식특점.방법 대산동성≥18세인군정신장애류행병학조사수거진행이차분석,이부합DSM-Ⅳ진단적720례초필장애환자작위연구조,안동성별、동년령조(±3세)、동촌혹동사구1∶1배대,재수거고중선택720명무임하정신질병진단자작위정상대조조.연구공구채용일반건강문권、생명질량량표、간역응대방식문권화일반자료조사문권.결과 초필장애환자적생명질량평분저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).응대방식중초필장애환자소겁응대인자평분고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).량인소방차분석현시,재배제성별、년령、직업、수교육년한、혼인상황、종교신앙인소적영향후,초필장애환자적생명질량평분잉저우대조조,소겁응대인자평분잉고우대조조.결론 초필장애환자생명질량저우정상대조조,차다채용소겁응대방식.
Objective To explore the characteristics related to the quality of life and the way of response among patients with anxiety disorder in Shandong province.Methods Case-control study was adopted,with secondary data analysis on mental disorders among adults over 18 years of age,in Shandong province.720 patients with anxiety disorder who met the anxiety diagnostic criteria of DSM-Ⅳ,were selected from the database,according to the distributions on gender,age (± 3 years of age),village or community.720 persons without any psychiatric diagnosis were selected and served as controls,under 1 ∶ 1 paired choice.Research tools would include:General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12),Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ),Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ),and questionnaire on general information.Results Scores of QLQ among patients with anxiety disorder were lower than that of the control group,with statistically significant difference (P <0.01).Scores on the negative ways of coping among patients with anxiety disorder were higher than the scores of the control group,with statistically significant difference (P<0.01).Regardless of gender,age,occupation,education,marriage,religious belief etc.,results from the ‘ two factors anova-analysis'showed that the scores of QLQ among patients with anxiety disorder were still lower than the scores of the control group while the scores on negative coping were still higher than the scores of the control group.Conclusion Patients with anxiety disorder and having poor quality of life outnumbered the ones from the control group,and using negative coping ways to cope with the stress events.