中华泌尿外科杂志
中華泌尿外科雜誌
중화비뇨외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
2013年
10期
732-737
,共6页
康钦钦%马超%张火俊%潘春树%宋涛%常乐%陆建平
康欽欽%馬超%張火俊%潘春樹%宋濤%常樂%陸建平
강흠흠%마초%장화준%반춘수%송도%상악%륙건평
肾乏脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤%肾透明细胞癌%体层摄影术,X线计算机
腎乏脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤%腎透明細胞癌%體層攝影術,X線計算機
신핍지방혈관평활기지방류%신투명세포암%체층섭영술,X선계산궤
Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma(MFAML)%Clear cell renal cell carcinoma(CCRCC)%Tomography,X-ray computed
目的 比较肾乏脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(MFAML)与肾透明细胞癌(CCRCC)的高分辨螺旋CT影像特征,以提高MFAML的诊断准确率. 方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年4月经病理证实的24例MFAML患者的临床资料,男8例,女16例.年龄19~74岁,平均43岁.同期24例CCRCC患者,男8例,女16例.年龄21~76岁,平均44岁.比较两组患者的高分辨螺旋CT影像特征,包括肿瘤的位置、密度、强化特征(强化程度、强化是否均匀、强化数值、强化方式)、边缘、钙化及肾周的改变等.采用多变量Logistic回归分析各项CT特征对两组患者的鉴别诊断价值.结果 MFAML组肿瘤位于下极11例、中部7例、上极6例,CCRCC组下极9例、中部9例、上极6例;MFAML组21例和CCRCC组19例肿瘤边缘较光滑,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组均有21例在皮质早期明显强化,为富血供肿瘤,但CCRCC组皮质早期及皮质期的平均强化数值(175、196 HU)均高于MFAML组(125、145 HU),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).MFAML组15例表现为均匀强化,9例为不均匀强化;CCRCC组7例为均匀强化,17例为不均匀强化,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).强化方式对鉴别二者差异无统计学意义,MFAML组13例中8例为富血供肿瘤(6例为快进快出性强化,2例为持续性强化),余5例乏血供肿瘤为持续或渐进性强化;CCRCC组24例中21例为富血供肿瘤(15例为快进快出性强化,5例为持续性强化,1例为渐进性强化),余3例乏血供肿瘤为持续性强化.Logistic回归分析结果表明,平扫期高密度(OR=0.010,P=0.002)和以皮质期CT值增加129.5 HU作为阈值(OR=0.057,P=0.004)是鉴别MFAML与CCRCC最有价值的特征. 结论 平扫期高密度及皮质期强化数值<129.5 HU是MFAML最具诊断价值的CT特征.75%富血供MFAML表现为快进快出的强化方式,其与CCRCC的鉴别存在困难.
目的 比較腎乏脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(MFAML)與腎透明細胞癌(CCRCC)的高分辨螺鏇CT影像特徵,以提高MFAML的診斷準確率. 方法 迴顧性分析2011年1月至2012年4月經病理證實的24例MFAML患者的臨床資料,男8例,女16例.年齡19~74歲,平均43歲.同期24例CCRCC患者,男8例,女16例.年齡21~76歲,平均44歲.比較兩組患者的高分辨螺鏇CT影像特徵,包括腫瘤的位置、密度、彊化特徵(彊化程度、彊化是否均勻、彊化數值、彊化方式)、邊緣、鈣化及腎週的改變等.採用多變量Logistic迴歸分析各項CT特徵對兩組患者的鑒彆診斷價值.結果 MFAML組腫瘤位于下極11例、中部7例、上極6例,CCRCC組下極9例、中部9例、上極6例;MFAML組21例和CCRCC組19例腫瘤邊緣較光滑,兩組比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).兩組均有21例在皮質早期明顯彊化,為富血供腫瘤,但CCRCC組皮質早期及皮質期的平均彊化數值(175、196 HU)均高于MFAML組(125、145 HU),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).MFAML組15例錶現為均勻彊化,9例為不均勻彊化;CCRCC組7例為均勻彊化,17例為不均勻彊化,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).彊化方式對鑒彆二者差異無統計學意義,MFAML組13例中8例為富血供腫瘤(6例為快進快齣性彊化,2例為持續性彊化),餘5例乏血供腫瘤為持續或漸進性彊化;CCRCC組24例中21例為富血供腫瘤(15例為快進快齣性彊化,5例為持續性彊化,1例為漸進性彊化),餘3例乏血供腫瘤為持續性彊化.Logistic迴歸分析結果錶明,平掃期高密度(OR=0.010,P=0.002)和以皮質期CT值增加129.5 HU作為閾值(OR=0.057,P=0.004)是鑒彆MFAML與CCRCC最有價值的特徵. 結論 平掃期高密度及皮質期彊化數值<129.5 HU是MFAML最具診斷價值的CT特徵.75%富血供MFAML錶現為快進快齣的彊化方式,其與CCRCC的鑒彆存在睏難.
목적 비교신핍지방혈관평활기지방류(MFAML)여신투명세포암(CCRCC)적고분변라선CT영상특정,이제고MFAML적진단준학솔. 방법 회고성분석2011년1월지2012년4월경병리증실적24례MFAML환자적림상자료,남8례,녀16례.년령19~74세,평균43세.동기24례CCRCC환자,남8례,녀16례.년령21~76세,평균44세.비교량조환자적고분변라선CT영상특정,포괄종류적위치、밀도、강화특정(강화정도、강화시부균균、강화수치、강화방식)、변연、개화급신주적개변등.채용다변량Logistic회귀분석각항CT특정대량조환자적감별진단개치.결과 MFAML조종류위우하겁11례、중부7례、상겁6례,CCRCC조하겁9례、중부9례、상겁6례;MFAML조21례화CCRCC조19례종류변연교광활,량조비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).량조균유21례재피질조기명현강화,위부혈공종류,단CCRCC조피질조기급피질기적평균강화수치(175、196 HU)균고우MFAML조(125、145 HU),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).MFAML조15례표현위균균강화,9례위불균균강화;CCRCC조7례위균균강화,17례위불균균강화,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).강화방식대감별이자차이무통계학의의,MFAML조13례중8례위부혈공종류(6례위쾌진쾌출성강화,2례위지속성강화),여5례핍혈공종류위지속혹점진성강화;CCRCC조24례중21례위부혈공종류(15례위쾌진쾌출성강화,5례위지속성강화,1례위점진성강화),여3례핍혈공종류위지속성강화.Logistic회귀분석결과표명,평소기고밀도(OR=0.010,P=0.002)화이피질기CT치증가129.5 HU작위역치(OR=0.057,P=0.004)시감별MFAML여CCRCC최유개치적특정. 결론 평소기고밀도급피질기강화수치<129.5 HU시MFAML최구진단개치적CT특정.75%부혈공MFAML표현위쾌진쾌출적강화방식,기여CCRCC적감별존재곤난.
Objective To investigate the characteristics of minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma (MFAML)and clear cell renal cell carcinoma(CCRCC)in high resolution multi-slice spiral CT(MSCT)and to improve the diagnosis accuracy for the renal tumors.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 24 MFAML patients(16 females,8 males)with mean age of 43(19-74)years and 24 CCRCC patients(16 females,8 males)with mean age of 44(21-76)years.All patients had undergone MSCT and proved histopathologically after surgery.The characteristics included tumor location,tumor attenuation on unenhanced CT,enhancement characteristics(degree of tumor enhancement in the early corticomedullary phase,homogeneity of enhancement,amount of enhancement,enhancement pattern over time),tumor margin,intratumoral calcification,and perinephric changes.The predictive value of each CT characteristic was determined by using multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results The tumor location in the kidney (upper pole:MFAML,6 cases,CCRCC,6 cases;middle:MFAML,7 cases,CCRCC,9 cases;lower pole:MFAML,11 cases,CCRCC,9 cases)and smooth tumor margin(MFAML,n=21;CCRCC,n=19)were not significantly different between MFAML patients and those with CCRCC,P>0.05.Twenty-one cases of both MFAMLs and CCRCCs had the significant enhancement in the early corticomedullary phase,which were hypovascular tumors,whereas the mean amount of tumor enhancement was greater in CCRCC than in MFAML in both the early corticomedullary and the corticomedullary phases(CCRCC:175 HU,196 HU;MFAML:125 HU,145 HU;P<0.05.MFAML usually showed homogeneous enhancement(n=15)rather than heterogeneous enhancement(n =9),whereas most CCRCC showed heterogeneous enhancement(n =17)rather than homogeneous enhancement(n =7),P<0.05).Enhancement pattern was not a significant predictor.Within the 13 MFAML cases,8 cases had sufficient blood supply(6 cases showed obvious "wash-in-and-wash-out",2 cases were with prolonged enhancement),5 cases with hypovascular showed a pattern of prolonged or gradual enhancement,while 21 CCRCC cases had sufficient blood supply and 71% of them showed obvious "wash-in-and-wash-out".High tumor attenuation on unenhanced scans(MFAML:17 patients (75%);CCRCC:2 patients(8%),P=0.002,OR=0.010)and threshold enhancement values of 129.5 HU in the corticomedullary phase(MFAML:5 patients(20%);CCRCC:20 patients(83%),P =0.004,OR =0.057)were valuable predictors for differentiating MFAML from CCRCC at multivariate logistic regression analysis.Conclusions MSCT is useful in differentiating MFAML from CCRCC,with high tumor attenuation on unenhanced scans and threshold enhancement values of 129.5 HU in the corticomedullary phase being the most valuable CT findings.75% of MFAMLs with sufficient blood supply also show a pattern of "wash-in-and-wash-out",which can easily misdiagnosed as a renal cancer.