中华泌尿外科杂志
中華泌尿外科雜誌
중화비뇨외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
2013年
12期
933-936
,共4页
孙国锋%张弋%孟军%杨冰%于澄钒%王刚%胡明球%李宁忱%那彦群
孫國鋒%張弋%孟軍%楊冰%于澄釩%王剛%鬍明毬%李寧忱%那彥群
손국봉%장익%맹군%양빙%우징범%왕강%호명구%리저침%나언군
腹腔镜%计算机模拟%医学教育%外科技能培训
腹腔鏡%計算機模擬%醫學教育%外科技能培訓
복강경%계산궤모의%의학교육%외과기능배훈
Laparoscopy%Computer simulation%Medical education%Surgical skill training
目的 探讨腹腔镜虚拟模拟机在腹腔镜技能培训中的有效性. 方法 2012年2月至10月选取30名医学生和22名泌尿外科医生(独立完成腹腔镜手术例数<10例)参加腹腔镜技能培训,在腹腔镜虚拟模拟机上进行移物、电灼、剪切和缝合操作,培训时间为5d,每天2h.问卷调查比较培训前后腹腔镜虚拟模拟机客观评分和综合评估量表(GRS)评分结果. 结果 30名医学生培训后与培训前比较,移物时间分别为(110.3±25.6)、(198.7±52.3)s,电灼时间分别为(233.2±39.7)、(484.6± 157.6)s,剪切时间分别为(118.6±35.1)、(272.3±75.6)s,精度误差面积分别为(58.0±34.8)、(92.4±56.1)mm2,缝合时间分别为(80.2±38.3)、(280.6± 110.1)s,电灼效率分别为(90.4±5.0)%、(83.5±6.4)%,缝合准确率分别为(92.5±16.3)%、(68.5±24.2)%,GRS分别为(20.0±1.1)、(7.5±1.2)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).22名泌尿外科医生培训后与培训前比较,移物时间分别为(103.1士16.7)、(171.4±42.6)s,电灼时间分别为(210.3±17.4)、(397.0士129.8)s,剪切时间分别为(97.1±9.6)、(311.6± 171.6)s,精度误差面积分别为(7.2±3.6)、(30.1± 18.8) mm2,缝合时间分别为(84.5±29.3)、(328.1± 128.8)s,电灼效率分别为(91.7±7.3)%、(81.4±9.1)%,缝合准确率分别为(96.0±7.2)%、(69.9±22.2)%,GRS分别为(25.2±1.9)、(13.8±1.5)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).调查问卷结果显示25名(83.4%)医学生认为腹腔镜虚拟模拟培训对临床实习帮助明显或非常有帮助,16名(72.7%)泌尿外科医生认为模拟培训对提高腹腔镜操作能力帮助明显或非常有帮助. 结论 通过腹腔镜虚拟模拟机进行培训可提高腹腔镜基本操作技能,有可能成为一种有效的腹腔镜技能培训方法.
目的 探討腹腔鏡虛擬模擬機在腹腔鏡技能培訓中的有效性. 方法 2012年2月至10月選取30名醫學生和22名泌尿外科醫生(獨立完成腹腔鏡手術例數<10例)參加腹腔鏡技能培訓,在腹腔鏡虛擬模擬機上進行移物、電灼、剪切和縫閤操作,培訓時間為5d,每天2h.問捲調查比較培訓前後腹腔鏡虛擬模擬機客觀評分和綜閤評估量錶(GRS)評分結果. 結果 30名醫學生培訓後與培訓前比較,移物時間分彆為(110.3±25.6)、(198.7±52.3)s,電灼時間分彆為(233.2±39.7)、(484.6± 157.6)s,剪切時間分彆為(118.6±35.1)、(272.3±75.6)s,精度誤差麵積分彆為(58.0±34.8)、(92.4±56.1)mm2,縫閤時間分彆為(80.2±38.3)、(280.6± 110.1)s,電灼效率分彆為(90.4±5.0)%、(83.5±6.4)%,縫閤準確率分彆為(92.5±16.3)%、(68.5±24.2)%,GRS分彆為(20.0±1.1)、(7.5±1.2)分,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).22名泌尿外科醫生培訓後與培訓前比較,移物時間分彆為(103.1士16.7)、(171.4±42.6)s,電灼時間分彆為(210.3±17.4)、(397.0士129.8)s,剪切時間分彆為(97.1±9.6)、(311.6± 171.6)s,精度誤差麵積分彆為(7.2±3.6)、(30.1± 18.8) mm2,縫閤時間分彆為(84.5±29.3)、(328.1± 128.8)s,電灼效率分彆為(91.7±7.3)%、(81.4±9.1)%,縫閤準確率分彆為(96.0±7.2)%、(69.9±22.2)%,GRS分彆為(25.2±1.9)、(13.8±1.5)分,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).調查問捲結果顯示25名(83.4%)醫學生認為腹腔鏡虛擬模擬培訓對臨床實習幫助明顯或非常有幫助,16名(72.7%)泌尿外科醫生認為模擬培訓對提高腹腔鏡操作能力幫助明顯或非常有幫助. 結論 通過腹腔鏡虛擬模擬機進行培訓可提高腹腔鏡基本操作技能,有可能成為一種有效的腹腔鏡技能培訓方法.
목적 탐토복강경허의모의궤재복강경기능배훈중적유효성. 방법 2012년2월지10월선취30명의학생화22명비뇨외과의생(독립완성복강경수술례수<10례)삼가복강경기능배훈,재복강경허의모의궤상진행이물、전작、전절화봉합조작,배훈시간위5d,매천2h.문권조사비교배훈전후복강경허의모의궤객관평분화종합평고량표(GRS)평분결과. 결과 30명의학생배훈후여배훈전비교,이물시간분별위(110.3±25.6)、(198.7±52.3)s,전작시간분별위(233.2±39.7)、(484.6± 157.6)s,전절시간분별위(118.6±35.1)、(272.3±75.6)s,정도오차면적분별위(58.0±34.8)、(92.4±56.1)mm2,봉합시간분별위(80.2±38.3)、(280.6± 110.1)s,전작효솔분별위(90.4±5.0)%、(83.5±6.4)%,봉합준학솔분별위(92.5±16.3)%、(68.5±24.2)%,GRS분별위(20.0±1.1)、(7.5±1.2)분,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).22명비뇨외과의생배훈후여배훈전비교,이물시간분별위(103.1사16.7)、(171.4±42.6)s,전작시간분별위(210.3±17.4)、(397.0사129.8)s,전절시간분별위(97.1±9.6)、(311.6± 171.6)s,정도오차면적분별위(7.2±3.6)、(30.1± 18.8) mm2,봉합시간분별위(84.5±29.3)、(328.1± 128.8)s,전작효솔분별위(91.7±7.3)%、(81.4±9.1)%,봉합준학솔분별위(96.0±7.2)%、(69.9±22.2)%,GRS분별위(25.2±1.9)、(13.8±1.5)분,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).조사문권결과현시25명(83.4%)의학생인위복강경허의모의배훈대림상실습방조명현혹비상유방조,16명(72.7%)비뇨외과의생인위모의배훈대제고복강경조작능력방조명현혹비상유방조. 결론 통과복강경허의모의궤진행배훈가제고복강경기본조작기능,유가능성위일충유효적복강경기능배훈방법.
Objective To evaluate the validity of laparoscopic basic skills training on the virtual reality simulator.Methods 30 medical students and 22 urology doctors (less than 10 procedures performed) were enrolled for laparoscopic visual reality training from February 2012 to October 2012.Each participant was tested in 5 days by laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer,electrocautery,patten cutting and knot tying) of virtual reality simulator.The scores before and after the training were recorded and analyzed.Participants filled out questionnaires regarding their previous experiences,opinions of the usefulness of laparoscopic visual reality training before and after the training.Results 30 medical students after the training and training before,the time consumption in peg transfer (110.3-±25.6 s and 198.7±52.3 s,P=0.000),electrocautery (233.2±39.7 s and 484.6±157.6 s,P=0.000),patten cutting(118.6±35.1 s and 272.3±75.6,P=0.000),knot tying (80.2±38.3 s and 280.6±110.1 s,P=0.000) and area of accuracy error (58.0±34.8mm2 and 92.4±56.1mm2,P=0.000),while improved electrocautery efficiency (90.4±5.0) % and (83.5±6.4%,P =0.000,suturing accuracy rate (92.5 ± 16.3) % and (68.5 ± 24.2) %,P =0.000 and GRS scores (25.2± 1.9 & 7.5± 1.2,P =0.000) after 5-day training.22 urology doctors after the training and training before,the time consumption in peg transfer (103.1 ± 16.7 s and 171.4± 42.6 s,P =0.004),electrocautery (210.3±17.4 s and 397.0±129.8 s,P=0.027),patten cutting (97.1±9.6 s and 311.6±171.6 s,P=0.000),knot tying (84.5±29.3 s and 328.1±128.8 s,P=0.002) and area of accuracy error (7.2±3.6 mm2 and 30.1 ± 18.8 mm2,P =0.009),while improved electrocautery efficiency (91.7 ± 7.3) % and (81.4 ±9.1) %,P =0.004,suturing accuracy rate (96.0± 7.2) % and (69.9± 22.2) %,P =0.006 and GRS scores (20.0± 1.1 and 13.8± 1.5,P =0.000) after 5-day training.At the end of training,most of the participants rated laparoscopic virtual reality training as " obviously helpful" or " very helpful".Conclusions Laparoscopic virtual reality training could be helpful to improve the laparoscopic basic skills.