中华麻醉学杂志
中華痳醉學雜誌
중화마취학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
2012年
11期
1331-1333
,共3页
戚志超%朱小兵%刘志群%吴论%彭学强%邹伟伟%周克亭%郑伟
慼誌超%硃小兵%劉誌群%吳論%彭學彊%鄒偉偉%週剋亭%鄭偉
척지초%주소병%류지군%오론%팽학강%추위위%주극정%정위
麻醉,硬膜外%手术中并发症
痳醉,硬膜外%手術中併髮癥
마취,경막외%수술중병발증
Anesthesia,epidural%Intraoperative complications
目的 评价国产钢丝加强型硬膜外导管对硬膜外阻滞实施中不良事件发生的影响.方法 选择拟行脊椎-硬膜外联合阻滞的择期手术患者300例,年龄18~64岁,体重41~ 78 kg,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级.采用随机数字表法,将其随机分为3组(n=100):普通聚氯乙烯硬膜外导管组(A组)、进口钢丝加强型硬膜外导管组(B组)和国产钢丝加强型硬膜外导管组(C组).常规行脊椎-硬膜外联合阻滞,各组置入相应的硬膜外导管.记录硬膜外置管通畅情况、置管时感觉异常、回抽见血或脑脊液、穿刺误入血管、注药遇阻、拔除硬膜外导管难易情况、拔管后出血、术后感觉异常及术后1周内硬膜外血肿的发生情况.结果 与A组比较,B组和C组硬膜外置管时感觉异常、回抽见血或脑脊液、注药遇阻和术后感觉异常的发生率降低(P<0.05),其余指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组和C组各指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 国产钢丝加强型硬膜外导管可降低置管损伤神经及血管的发生机率,其效果与进口钢丝加强型硬膜外导管相似.
目的 評價國產鋼絲加彊型硬膜外導管對硬膜外阻滯實施中不良事件髮生的影響.方法 選擇擬行脊椎-硬膜外聯閤阻滯的擇期手術患者300例,年齡18~64歲,體重41~ 78 kg,ASA分級Ⅰ或Ⅱ級.採用隨機數字錶法,將其隨機分為3組(n=100):普通聚氯乙烯硬膜外導管組(A組)、進口鋼絲加彊型硬膜外導管組(B組)和國產鋼絲加彊型硬膜外導管組(C組).常規行脊椎-硬膜外聯閤阻滯,各組置入相應的硬膜外導管.記錄硬膜外置管通暢情況、置管時感覺異常、迴抽見血或腦脊液、穿刺誤入血管、註藥遇阻、拔除硬膜外導管難易情況、拔管後齣血、術後感覺異常及術後1週內硬膜外血腫的髮生情況.結果 與A組比較,B組和C組硬膜外置管時感覺異常、迴抽見血或腦脊液、註藥遇阻和術後感覺異常的髮生率降低(P<0.05),其餘指標差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);B組和C組各指標比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 國產鋼絲加彊型硬膜外導管可降低置管損傷神經及血管的髮生機率,其效果與進口鋼絲加彊型硬膜外導管相似.
목적 평개국산강사가강형경막외도관대경막외조체실시중불량사건발생적영향.방법 선택의행척추-경막외연합조체적택기수술환자300례,년령18~64세,체중41~ 78 kg,ASA분급Ⅰ혹Ⅱ급.채용수궤수자표법,장기수궤분위3조(n=100):보통취록을희경막외도관조(A조)、진구강사가강형경막외도관조(B조)화국산강사가강형경막외도관조(C조).상규행척추-경막외연합조체,각조치입상응적경막외도관.기록경막외치관통창정황、치관시감각이상、회추견혈혹뇌척액、천자오입혈관、주약우조、발제경막외도관난역정황、발관후출혈、술후감각이상급술후1주내경막외혈종적발생정황.결과 여A조비교,B조화C조경막외치관시감각이상、회추견혈혹뇌척액、주약우조화술후감각이상적발생솔강저(P<0.05),기여지표차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);B조화C조각지표비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 국산강사가강형경막외도관가강저치관손상신경급혈관적발생궤솔,기효과여진구강사가강형경막외도관상사.
Objective To evaluate the effect of domestic wire-reinforced epidural catheter on the occurrence of adverse events during epidural block.Methods Three hundred ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes,aged 18-64 yr,weighing 41-78 kg,scheduled for elective operations under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia,were randomly divided into 3 groups (n =100 each):polyvinyl chloride epidural catheter group (group A),imported wire-reinforced epidural catheter group (group B) and domestic wire-reinforced epidural catheter group (group C).Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed routinely.The corresponding epidural catheter was inserted in each group.The catheterization without difficulty,paresthesia during catheterization,the number of patients in whom blood or cerebrospinal fluid was withdrawn from the epidural catheter,intravascular catheter insertion,injection obstruction,easiness during removal of the catheter,bleeding after removal,postoperative paresthesia and epidural hematoma within 1 week after operation were recorded.Results Compared with A group,the incidences of paresthesia during catheterization,the number of patients in whom blood or cerebrospinal fluid was withdrawn from the epidural catheter,injection obstruction and postoperative paresthesia were significantly decreased (P < 0.05),and no significant change was found in the other parameters in B and C groups (P > 0.05).There was no significant difference in all the parameters between B group and C group (P > 0.05).Conclusion Domestic wire-reinforced epidural catheter can decrease the occurrence of catheterization-induced damage to the nerve and blood vessels and the efficacy is comparable with that of imported wire-reinforced epidural catheter.