中国医药
中國醫藥
중국의약
CHINA MEDICINE
2013年
11期
1603-1604
,共2页
陈彬%沈潜%徐王磊%王雄华
陳彬%瀋潛%徐王磊%王雄華
진빈%침잠%서왕뢰%왕웅화
急腹症%围术期%生理学和手术严重程度评分
急腹癥%圍術期%生理學和手術嚴重程度評分
급복증%위술기%생이학화수술엄중정도평분
Acute abdomen%Perioperative%Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity
目的 探讨生理学和手术严重程度评分(POSSUM评分)用于指导老年急腹症患者围术期监测及治疗的价值.方法 选取浙江中医药大学附属宁波市中医院106例老年急腹症手术患者,按就诊时期分为2组:A组57例,围术期不评分,仅依据医师经验进行监测与治疗,对病历资料进行回顾性评分;B组49例,在术后立即进行POSSUM评分并依此指导治疗.比较2组术后并发症发生情况和病死率,同时比较所有患者实际并发症发生情况、病死率与评分预测值间的差异.结果 所有患者并发症发生率(x2=6.97,P=0.47)和病死率(x2=3.27,P=0.39)评分预测值(89.1%、18.7%)与实际值(78.0%、11.1%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而B组术后并发症发生率[30.6%(15/49)]低于A组的[47.4%(27/57)],组间差异有统计学意义(x2 =4.52,P=0.043).结论 POSSUM评分能较好地预示老年急腹症患者手术后并发症和死亡的发生.在其预警下做好围术期治疗,有助于减少术后并发症.
目的 探討生理學和手術嚴重程度評分(POSSUM評分)用于指導老年急腹癥患者圍術期鑑測及治療的價值.方法 選取浙江中醫藥大學附屬寧波市中醫院106例老年急腹癥手術患者,按就診時期分為2組:A組57例,圍術期不評分,僅依據醫師經驗進行鑑測與治療,對病歷資料進行迴顧性評分;B組49例,在術後立即進行POSSUM評分併依此指導治療.比較2組術後併髮癥髮生情況和病死率,同時比較所有患者實際併髮癥髮生情況、病死率與評分預測值間的差異.結果 所有患者併髮癥髮生率(x2=6.97,P=0.47)和病死率(x2=3.27,P=0.39)評分預測值(89.1%、18.7%)與實際值(78.0%、11.1%)差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);而B組術後併髮癥髮生率[30.6%(15/49)]低于A組的[47.4%(27/57)],組間差異有統計學意義(x2 =4.52,P=0.043).結論 POSSUM評分能較好地預示老年急腹癥患者手術後併髮癥和死亡的髮生.在其預警下做好圍術期治療,有助于減少術後併髮癥.
목적 탐토생이학화수술엄중정도평분(POSSUM평분)용우지도노년급복증환자위술기감측급치료적개치.방법 선취절강중의약대학부속저파시중의원106례노년급복증수술환자,안취진시기분위2조:A조57례,위술기불평분,부의거의사경험진행감측여치료,대병력자료진행회고성평분;B조49례,재술후립즉진행POSSUM평분병의차지도치료.비교2조술후병발증발생정황화병사솔,동시비교소유환자실제병발증발생정황、병사솔여평분예측치간적차이.결과 소유환자병발증발생솔(x2=6.97,P=0.47)화병사솔(x2=3.27,P=0.39)평분예측치(89.1%、18.7%)여실제치(78.0%、11.1%)차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);이B조술후병발증발생솔[30.6%(15/49)]저우A조적[47.4%(27/57)],조간차이유통계학의의(x2 =4.52,P=0.043).결론 POSSUM평분능교호지예시노년급복증환자수술후병발증화사망적발생.재기예경하주호위술기치료,유조우감소술후병발증.
Objective To evaluate the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity system for the perioperative monitoring and management of elderly patients with acute abdomen undergoing resection.Methods In this study,106 perioperative cases were divided into two groups.Group A was not evaluated by the POSSUM system and managed empirically; group B was recorded by POSSUM immediately at the end of operation and managed accordingly.Postoperative morbidity and mortality was compared between the two groups.Results All patients complication rate (x2 =6.97,P =0.47) and mortality (x2 =3.27,P =0.39) score predictive value (89.1%,18.7%) and the actual value (78.0%,11.1%) showed no statistical significance (P > 0.05) ; the incidence of postoperative complications in group B (30.6%) was lowere than that in group A (47.4%) ; there were statistically significant difference between two groups (x2 =4.52,P =0.043).Conclusion The POSSUM methodology allows satisfactory prediction of mortality and morbidity rates in elderly patients with acute abdomen undergoing resection.