中国医药
中國醫藥
중국의약
CHINA MEDICINE
2014年
4期
566-570
,共5页
鹿见香%杨顶权%李锘%白彦萍
鹿見香%楊頂權%李锘%白彥萍
록견향%양정권%리첨%백언평
银屑病,中重度%重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白%清热凉血方
銀屑病,中重度%重組人Ⅱ型腫瘤壞死因子受體-抗體融閤蛋白%清熱涼血方
은설병,중중도%중조인Ⅱ형종류배사인자수체-항체융합단백%청열량혈방
Psoriasis,moderately severe%Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α receptor Ⅱ%IgG Fc fusion protein for injection%Heat-clearing and blood-cooling recipe
目的 探讨注射用重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白(益赛普)联合中药清热凉血方治疗中重度难治性银屑病的疗效和安全性.方法 选取中日友好医院皮肤科30例中重度银屑病患者,完全随机分为益赛普联合清热凉血方组、阿维A联合清热凉血方组和清热凉血方组,每组10例.益赛普联合中药组在口服中药清热凉血方的基础上予以益赛普50 mg皮下注射,每周1次;阿维A联合清热凉血方组为口服中药基础上每日口服阿维A胶囊30 mg,1次/d;清热凉血方组给予中药清热凉血方治疗,每日2次;疗程均为12周.观察3组患者治疗4、8、12周后银屑病皮损面积和严重程度指数(PASI)、患者整体评价(PGA)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、生活质量评分及不良反应.结果 治疗12周后,益赛普联合清热凉血方组、阿维A联合清热凉血方组和清热凉血方组的PASI、PGA、VAS评分较治疗前明显降低[PASI评分:(4.6±1.0)分比(28.7±2.3)分,(15.0±0.9)分比(31.9±2.1)分,(19.0±1.7)分比(26.8±1.7)分;PGA评分:(1.40±0.22)分比(5.20±0.20)分,(3.10±0.18)分比(5.60±0.22)分,(4.00±0.21)分比(5.20±0.20)分;VAS评分:(2.20±0.44)分比(7.40±0.43)分,(4.40±0.16)分比(7.90±0.41)分,(5.50±0.27)分比(6.90±0.38)分](P<0.05).治疗8周后,益赛普联合清热凉血方组和阿维A联合清热凉血方组PASI[(9.8±1.3)、(19.2±0.9)分]、PGA[(2.60 ±0.31)、(4.00±0.15)分]、VAS[(4.20±0.33)、(5.20±0.25)分]评分均低于治疗前(P<0.05);治疗4周后,益赛普联合清热凉血方组的PASI[(16.6±1.7)分]、PGA[(3.80 ±0.33)分]、VAS[(5.40 ±0.16)分]评分均低于治疗前,阿维A联合清热凉血方组PASI[(27.5±1.7)分]评分低于治疗前,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).益赛普联合清热凉血方组治疗4、8、12周后的PASI、PGA、VAS评分和阿维A联合清热凉血方组治疗后8、12周的PASI、PGA、VAS评分均低于清热凉血方组同期指标(均P<0.05).益赛普联合清热凉血方组治疗4、8、12周后PASI评分与阿维A联合清热凉血方组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).益赛普联合清热凉血方组、阿维A联合清热凉血方组和热凉血方组治疗12周后生活质量评分与治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义[(3.2±0.9)分比(25.1±3.1)分,(16.1±1.6)分比(30.4±2.0)分,(18.9±2.0)分比(25.8±1.7)分](P<0.05).益赛普联合清热凉血方组和阿维A联合清热凉血方组的生活质量评分均低于清热凉血方组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);益赛普联合清热凉血方组的生活质量评分明显低于阿维A联合清热凉血方组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白治疗中重度的银屑病,起效迅速、疗效好,是顽固难治性银屑病的治疗方法的选择,其长期疗效以及安全性有待进一步观察.
目的 探討註射用重組人Ⅱ型腫瘤壞死因子受體-抗體融閤蛋白(益賽普)聯閤中藥清熱涼血方治療中重度難治性銀屑病的療效和安全性.方法 選取中日友好醫院皮膚科30例中重度銀屑病患者,完全隨機分為益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組、阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組和清熱涼血方組,每組10例.益賽普聯閤中藥組在口服中藥清熱涼血方的基礎上予以益賽普50 mg皮下註射,每週1次;阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組為口服中藥基礎上每日口服阿維A膠囊30 mg,1次/d;清熱涼血方組給予中藥清熱涼血方治療,每日2次;療程均為12週.觀察3組患者治療4、8、12週後銀屑病皮損麵積和嚴重程度指數(PASI)、患者整體評價(PGA)、視覺模擬評分(VAS)、生活質量評分及不良反應.結果 治療12週後,益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組、阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組和清熱涼血方組的PASI、PGA、VAS評分較治療前明顯降低[PASI評分:(4.6±1.0)分比(28.7±2.3)分,(15.0±0.9)分比(31.9±2.1)分,(19.0±1.7)分比(26.8±1.7)分;PGA評分:(1.40±0.22)分比(5.20±0.20)分,(3.10±0.18)分比(5.60±0.22)分,(4.00±0.21)分比(5.20±0.20)分;VAS評分:(2.20±0.44)分比(7.40±0.43)分,(4.40±0.16)分比(7.90±0.41)分,(5.50±0.27)分比(6.90±0.38)分](P<0.05).治療8週後,益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組和阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組PASI[(9.8±1.3)、(19.2±0.9)分]、PGA[(2.60 ±0.31)、(4.00±0.15)分]、VAS[(4.20±0.33)、(5.20±0.25)分]評分均低于治療前(P<0.05);治療4週後,益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組的PASI[(16.6±1.7)分]、PGA[(3.80 ±0.33)分]、VAS[(5.40 ±0.16)分]評分均低于治療前,阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組PASI[(27.5±1.7)分]評分低于治療前,差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05).益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組治療4、8、12週後的PASI、PGA、VAS評分和阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組治療後8、12週的PASI、PGA、VAS評分均低于清熱涼血方組同期指標(均P<0.05).益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組治療4、8、12週後PASI評分與阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組比較,差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05).益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組、阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組和熱涼血方組治療12週後生活質量評分與治療前比較,差異有統計學意義[(3.2±0.9)分比(25.1±3.1)分,(16.1±1.6)分比(30.4±2.0)分,(18.9±2.0)分比(25.8±1.7)分](P<0.05).益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組和阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組的生活質量評分均低于清熱涼血方組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);益賽普聯閤清熱涼血方組的生活質量評分明顯低于阿維A聯閤清熱涼血方組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 重組人Ⅱ型腫瘤壞死因子受體-抗體融閤蛋白治療中重度的銀屑病,起效迅速、療效好,是頑固難治性銀屑病的治療方法的選擇,其長期療效以及安全性有待進一步觀察.
목적 탐토주사용중조인Ⅱ형종류배사인자수체-항체융합단백(익새보)연합중약청열량혈방치료중중도난치성은설병적료효화안전성.방법 선취중일우호의원피부과30례중중도은설병환자,완전수궤분위익새보연합청열량혈방조、아유A연합청열량혈방조화청열량혈방조,매조10례.익새보연합중약조재구복중약청열량혈방적기출상여이익새보50 mg피하주사,매주1차;아유A연합청열량혈방조위구복중약기출상매일구복아유A효낭30 mg,1차/d;청열량혈방조급여중약청열량혈방치료,매일2차;료정균위12주.관찰3조환자치료4、8、12주후은설병피손면적화엄중정도지수(PASI)、환자정체평개(PGA)、시각모의평분(VAS)、생활질량평분급불량반응.결과 치료12주후,익새보연합청열량혈방조、아유A연합청열량혈방조화청열량혈방조적PASI、PGA、VAS평분교치료전명현강저[PASI평분:(4.6±1.0)분비(28.7±2.3)분,(15.0±0.9)분비(31.9±2.1)분,(19.0±1.7)분비(26.8±1.7)분;PGA평분:(1.40±0.22)분비(5.20±0.20)분,(3.10±0.18)분비(5.60±0.22)분,(4.00±0.21)분비(5.20±0.20)분;VAS평분:(2.20±0.44)분비(7.40±0.43)분,(4.40±0.16)분비(7.90±0.41)분,(5.50±0.27)분비(6.90±0.38)분](P<0.05).치료8주후,익새보연합청열량혈방조화아유A연합청열량혈방조PASI[(9.8±1.3)、(19.2±0.9)분]、PGA[(2.60 ±0.31)、(4.00±0.15)분]、VAS[(4.20±0.33)、(5.20±0.25)분]평분균저우치료전(P<0.05);치료4주후,익새보연합청열량혈방조적PASI[(16.6±1.7)분]、PGA[(3.80 ±0.33)분]、VAS[(5.40 ±0.16)분]평분균저우치료전,아유A연합청열량혈방조PASI[(27.5±1.7)분]평분저우치료전,차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05).익새보연합청열량혈방조치료4、8、12주후적PASI、PGA、VAS평분화아유A연합청열량혈방조치료후8、12주적PASI、PGA、VAS평분균저우청열량혈방조동기지표(균P<0.05).익새보연합청열량혈방조치료4、8、12주후PASI평분여아유A연합청열량혈방조비교,차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05).익새보연합청열량혈방조、아유A연합청열량혈방조화열량혈방조치료12주후생활질량평분여치료전비교,차이유통계학의의[(3.2±0.9)분비(25.1±3.1)분,(16.1±1.6)분비(30.4±2.0)분,(18.9±2.0)분비(25.8±1.7)분](P<0.05).익새보연합청열량혈방조화아유A연합청열량혈방조적생활질량평분균저우청열량혈방조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);익새보연합청열량혈방조적생활질량평분명현저우아유A연합청열량혈방조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 중조인Ⅱ형종류배사인자수체-항체융합단백치료중중도적은설병,기효신속、료효호,시완고난치성은설병적치료방법적선택,기장기료효이급안전성유대진일보관찰.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α receptor Ⅱ:IgG Fc fusion protein combined with heat-clearing and blood-cooling recipe (HCBCR) in the the treatment of moderate and severe refractory psoriasis.Methods Totally 30 patients with moderate and severe psoriasis of China-Japan Friendship Hospital were selected,and divided into the YiSaipu with HCBCR group,acitretin capsules with HCBCR group and HCBCR group,each with 10 patients.The YiSaipu with HCBCR applied YiSaipu 50 mg once-weekly subcutaneous injections except the HCBCR.The acitretin capsules with HCBCR group applied acitretin capsules 30 mg once a day except the HCBCR.HCBCR group just take HCBCR twice a day.The period takes continuously 3 months.Observation of changes of psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score,patient global assessment (PGA),visual analogue scale (VAS) score,quality of life scores before and after drug administration and adverse reaction.Results After 12 weeks treatment,PASI,PGA,VAS score of YiSaipu with HCBCR group,acitretin capsules with HCBCR group and HCBCR group were lower than that of before treatment [PASI:(4.6 ± 1.0) scores vs (28.7 ± 2.3) scores,(15.0 ± 0.9) scores vs (31.9 ± 2.1) scores,(19.0 ± 1.7) scores vs (26.8 ± 1.7) scores ; PGA:(1.40 ± 0.22) scores vs (5.20 ± 0.20) scores,(3.10 ± 0.18) scores vs (5.60 ± 0.22) scores,(4.00 ± 0.21) scores vs (5.20 ± 0.20) scores ; VAS:(2.20 ± 0.44) scores vs (7.40 ± 0.43) scores,(4.40 ±0.16) scores vs (7.90 ±0.41)scores,(5.50 ±0.27) scores vs (6.90 ±0.38) scores] (P<0.05).After 8 weeks treatment,PASI [(9.8 ± 1.3),(19.2 ± 0.9) scores],PGA [(2.60 ± 0.31),(4.00 ± 0.15) scores],VAS [(4.20 ± 0.33),(5.20 ± 0.25) scores] of YiSaipu with HCBCR group and acitretin capsules with HCBCR group were lower than that of before treatment (P < 0.05).After 4 weeks treatment,PASI [(16.6 ± 1.7) scores],PGA [(3.80 ±0.33)scores],VAS [(5.40 ±0.16)scores] of YiSaipu with HCBCR group were lower than that of before treatment,PASI [(27.5 ± 1.7)scores] of acitretin capsules with HCBCR group were lower than that of before treatment(P < 0.05).PASI,PGA,VAS score of YiSaipu with HCBCR group after 4,8,12 weeks and acitretin capsules with HCBCR group after 8,12 weeks were were lower than that of HCBCR group (P < 0.05).There were significant differences on PASI score of YiSaipu with HCBCR group after 4,8,12 weeks compared with acitretin capsules with HCBCR group (P <0.05).There were significant differences on quality of life scores of YiSaipu with HCBCR group,acitretin capsules with HCBCR group and HCBCR group after 12 weeks compared with before treatment [(3.2 ± 0.9) scores vs (25.1 ± 3.1) scores,(16.1 ± 1.6) scores vs (30.4 ± 2.0) scores,(18.9 ± 2.0) scores vs (25.8 ± 1.7) scores] (P < 0.05).Quality of life scores of YiSaipu with HCBCR group,acitretin capsules with HCBCR group were lower than that of HCBCR group (P < 0.05).Quality of life scores of YiSaipu with HCBCR group was lower than that of acitretin capsules with HCBCR group (P < 0.05).Conclusion YiSaipu combined with heat-clearing and blood-cooling recipe is significantly able to improve clinical sign and symptoms of moderate to severe psoriasis with effective and safety.