中华全科医师杂志
中華全科醫師雜誌
중화전과의사잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
2014年
7期
534-538
,共5页
刘瑶%祝墡珠%张向杰%杨华%周敬%陈倩%寿涓
劉瑤%祝墡珠%張嚮傑%楊華%週敬%陳倩%壽涓
류요%축선주%장향걸%양화%주경%진천%수연
全科医师%师培训资%德尔菲技术%标准
全科醫師%師培訓資%德爾菲技術%標準
전과의사%사배훈자%덕이비기술%표준
General practitioner%Teacher training%Delphi technique%Standards
目的 探讨全科医生规范化培训临床教学基地师资准入标准.方法 在文献研究和专家访谈的基础上,初步构建全科医生规范化培训临床教学基地师资准入标准体系,并于2013年3至10月期间,选择来自上海市各级医院、工作年限在10年及以上、具有中级及以上职称并且长期从事全科医学临床、教学或行政管理工作的专家32名,进行三轮德尔菲(Delphi)咨询,以确立评估指标体系.结果 初步建立了一套由3个一级指标和16个二级指标组成的全科医生规范化培训临床教学基地师资准入标准指标体系.3个一级指标为职业素养、临床医疗工作能力和教学能力,权重系数分别为0.332 0、0.336 0、0.332 0.三轮专家咨询的积极系数均为100％;专家的权威程度为0.881、0.897和0.883;评价指标重要性的协调系数分别为0.136、0.127和0.204(P ＜0.01).结论 本研究建立的全科临床教学基地师资准入标准体系可信度高,对于今后全科医学临床师资的遴选、提高全科医生规范化培训质量具有重要意义.
目的 探討全科醫生規範化培訓臨床教學基地師資準入標準.方法 在文獻研究和專傢訪談的基礎上,初步構建全科醫生規範化培訓臨床教學基地師資準入標準體繫,併于2013年3至10月期間,選擇來自上海市各級醫院、工作年限在10年及以上、具有中級及以上職稱併且長期從事全科醫學臨床、教學或行政管理工作的專傢32名,進行三輪德爾菲(Delphi)咨詢,以確立評估指標體繫.結果 初步建立瞭一套由3箇一級指標和16箇二級指標組成的全科醫生規範化培訓臨床教學基地師資準入標準指標體繫.3箇一級指標為職業素養、臨床醫療工作能力和教學能力,權重繫數分彆為0.332 0、0.336 0、0.332 0.三輪專傢咨詢的積極繫數均為100％;專傢的權威程度為0.881、0.897和0.883;評價指標重要性的協調繫數分彆為0.136、0.127和0.204(P ＜0.01).結論 本研究建立的全科臨床教學基地師資準入標準體繫可信度高,對于今後全科醫學臨床師資的遴選、提高全科醫生規範化培訓質量具有重要意義.
목적 탐토전과의생규범화배훈림상교학기지사자준입표준.방법 재문헌연구화전가방담적기출상,초보구건전과의생규범화배훈림상교학기지사자준입표준체계,병우2013년3지10월기간,선택래자상해시각급의원、공작년한재10년급이상、구유중급급이상직칭병차장기종사전과의학림상、교학혹행정관리공작적전가32명,진행삼륜덕이비(Delphi)자순,이학립평고지표체계.결과 초보건립료일투유3개일급지표화16개이급지표조성적전과의생규범화배훈림상교학기지사자준입표준지표체계.3개일급지표위직업소양、림상의료공작능력화교학능력,권중계수분별위0.332 0、0.336 0、0.332 0.삼륜전가자순적적겁계수균위100％;전가적권위정도위0.881、0.897화0.883;평개지표중요성적협조계수분별위0.136、0.127화0.204(P ＜0.01).결론 본연구건립적전과림상교학기지사자준입표준체계가신도고,대우금후전과의학림상사자적린선、제고전과의생규범화배훈질량구유중요의의.
Objective To develop criteria for trainers of general practitioners in clinical training bases.Methods A primary version of criteria was established through literature review and expert interview.Thirty-two experts with middle-level professional title or above,who had 10 years of working experience or more in general practice,teaching and administration,were invited for 3 rounds of Delphi consultation during March and October 2013.Results The criteria consisted of 3 first-grade indicators and 12 second-grade indicators were established.The first-grade indicators included professional quality,clinical competence and teaching capability.The weight coefficient of first-grade indicators were 0.332 0,0.336 0 and 0.332 0,respectively.For 3 rounds of consultation the activity coefficient of experts was all 100％ ; the authority coefficients of experts were 0.881,0.897 and 0.883,respectively; and the harmonious coefficient of importance of the evaluation were 0.136,0.127 and 0.204,respectively (P ＜ 0.01).Conclusion The established criteria are credible and important for the selection of trainers of general practitioners in clinical bases,which would improve the quality of standardized training for general practitioners.
