中华神经医学杂志
中華神經醫學雜誌
중화신경의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEUROMEDICINE
2014年
1期
76-79
,共4页
姜涛%张爱武%方燕南%徐如祥%邸伟%肖子建%漆薇韡%郑振扬
薑濤%張愛武%方燕南%徐如祥%邸偉%肖子建%漆薇韡%鄭振颺
강도%장애무%방연남%서여상%저위%초자건%칠미위%정진양
中枢神经系统感染%MRI%脑脊液
中樞神經繫統感染%MRI%腦脊液
중추신경계통감염%MRI%뇌척액
Central nervous system infection%Magnetic resonance imaging%Cerebrospinal fluid
目的 探讨脑脊液(CSF)常规以及MRI特点对中枢神经系统感染性疾病鉴别诊断的意义. 方法 中山大学附属第一医院神经内科自2007年1月至2011年12月收住院并确诊中枢神经系统感染性疾病患者274例,其中病毒性脑/脑膜炎(病毒脑)166例、化脓性脑膜炎(化脑)45例、结核性脑膜炎(结脑)47例、隐球菌性脑膜炎(隐脑)16例;回顾性分析患者的MRI常规及增强扫描结果、CSF常规、血中性粒细胞百分比检查结果,采用逐步判别分析各项指标对4种感染的鉴别诊断价值. 结果 MRI扫描结果显示MRI异常患者76例(27.74%),其中病毒脑38例,化脑10例,结脑26例,隐脑2例;4种感染患者的CSF压力、蛋白质、氯化物、糖、中性粒细胞含量、血中性粒细胞百分比不同,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).逐步回归分析筛选出CSF压力、蛋白质、氯化物、血中性粒细胞百分比、有无MRI病灶5项指标建立判别函数,诊断的总准确率为59.1%.诊断化脑的敏感性、特异性和准确率分别为24.4%、73.4%和65.3%,结脑为61.7%、80.6%和77.4%,隐脑为62.5%、56.9%和57.3%,病毒脑为67.5%、75.0%和70.4%. 结论 CSF压力、蛋白质、氯化物、血中性细胞百分比、有无MRI病灶对中枢神经系统感染性疾病的鉴别诊断最有意义,建立的判别函数对鉴别诊断具有一定价值,但临床上仍需病原学进行确诊.
目的 探討腦脊液(CSF)常規以及MRI特點對中樞神經繫統感染性疾病鑒彆診斷的意義. 方法 中山大學附屬第一醫院神經內科自2007年1月至2011年12月收住院併確診中樞神經繫統感染性疾病患者274例,其中病毒性腦/腦膜炎(病毒腦)166例、化膿性腦膜炎(化腦)45例、結覈性腦膜炎(結腦)47例、隱毬菌性腦膜炎(隱腦)16例;迴顧性分析患者的MRI常規及增彊掃描結果、CSF常規、血中性粒細胞百分比檢查結果,採用逐步判彆分析各項指標對4種感染的鑒彆診斷價值. 結果 MRI掃描結果顯示MRI異常患者76例(27.74%),其中病毒腦38例,化腦10例,結腦26例,隱腦2例;4種感染患者的CSF壓力、蛋白質、氯化物、糖、中性粒細胞含量、血中性粒細胞百分比不同,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).逐步迴歸分析篩選齣CSF壓力、蛋白質、氯化物、血中性粒細胞百分比、有無MRI病竈5項指標建立判彆函數,診斷的總準確率為59.1%.診斷化腦的敏感性、特異性和準確率分彆為24.4%、73.4%和65.3%,結腦為61.7%、80.6%和77.4%,隱腦為62.5%、56.9%和57.3%,病毒腦為67.5%、75.0%和70.4%. 結論 CSF壓力、蛋白質、氯化物、血中性細胞百分比、有無MRI病竈對中樞神經繫統感染性疾病的鑒彆診斷最有意義,建立的判彆函數對鑒彆診斷具有一定價值,但臨床上仍需病原學進行確診.
목적 탐토뇌척액(CSF)상규이급MRI특점대중추신경계통감염성질병감별진단적의의. 방법 중산대학부속제일의원신경내과자2007년1월지2011년12월수주원병학진중추신경계통감염성질병환자274례,기중병독성뇌/뇌막염(병독뇌)166례、화농성뇌막염(화뇌)45례、결핵성뇌막염(결뇌)47례、은구균성뇌막염(은뇌)16례;회고성분석환자적MRI상규급증강소묘결과、CSF상규、혈중성립세포백분비검사결과,채용축보판별분석각항지표대4충감염적감별진단개치. 결과 MRI소묘결과현시MRI이상환자76례(27.74%),기중병독뇌38례,화뇌10례,결뇌26례,은뇌2례;4충감염환자적CSF압력、단백질、록화물、당、중성립세포함량、혈중성립세포백분비불동,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).축보회귀분석사선출CSF압력、단백질、록화물、혈중성립세포백분비、유무MRI병조5항지표건립판별함수,진단적총준학솔위59.1%.진단화뇌적민감성、특이성화준학솔분별위24.4%、73.4%화65.3%,결뇌위61.7%、80.6%화77.4%,은뇌위62.5%、56.9%화57.3%,병독뇌위67.5%、75.0%화70.4%. 결론 CSF압력、단백질、록화물、혈중성세포백분비、유무MRI병조대중추신경계통감염성질병적감별진단최유의의,건립적판별함수대감별진단구유일정개치,단림상상잉수병원학진행학진.
Objective To investigate the significance of cerebrospinal fluid pressure,cytology and biochemistry,and MRI features in the early differential diagnosis of central nervous system infections.Methods The clinical data of 274 patients with central nervous system infections (viral encephalitis/meningitis in 166 patients,purulent meningitis in 45,tuberculous meningitis in 47 and cryptococcal meningitis in 16),admitted to our hospital from January 2007 to December 2011,were analyzed retrospectively.The cerebrospinal fluid pressure,cytology,biochemistry and MRI parameters were compared,and stepwise discriminant analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of these parameters in these four types of infections.Results Seventy six patients (27.74%) had abnormal MRI results; viral meningitis/encephalitis,purulent meningitis,tubercular meningitis and cryptococcal meningitis were found in 38,10,26 and 2 patients,respectively.Cerebrospinal fluid pressure,protein content,chloride and sugar level,and neutrophil percent were significantly different among the patients of four types of infections (P<0.05).And cerebrospinal fluid pressure,protein content,chloride level,neutrophil percent and MRI lesions were included in the discriminant functions by stepwise discriminant analysis; the total accurate rate of the discriminant functions for diagnosis was 59.1%.The sensitivity,specificity and accurate rate of the discriminant functions were 24.4%,73.4% and 65.3% in purulent meningitis,61.7%,80.6% and 77.4% in tubercular meningitis,62.5%,56.9% and 57.3% in cryptococcal meningitis and 67.5%,75.0% and 70.4% in viral meningitis/encephalitis,respectively.Conclusion Cerebrospinal fluid pressure,protein content and chloride level,neutrophil percent,and MRI lesions are important for differentially diagnosing central nervous system infection; the disscriminant functions produced by stepwise discriminant analysis are somewhat valuable for the differential diagnosis,and the final diagnosis still based on the etiology.