中华物理医学与康复杂志
中華物理醫學與康複雜誌
중화물리의학여강복잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
2013年
2期
140-143
,共4页
董超%张如飞%王文春%庞日朝%王倩%黄艺%葛杜鹃%张安仁
董超%張如飛%王文春%龐日朝%王倩%黃藝%葛杜鵑%張安仁
동초%장여비%왕문춘%방일조%왕천%황예%갈두견%장안인
抑郁症%脑电生物反馈%精神障碍诊断和统计手册%汉密尔顿抑郁量表%抑郁自评量表
抑鬱癥%腦電生物反饋%精神障礙診斷和統計手冊%漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶%抑鬱自評量錶
억욱증%뇌전생물반궤%정신장애진단화통계수책%한밀이돈억욱량표%억욱자평량표
Depression%Electroencephalographic biofeedback%Hamilton depression scale%Self-rating depression scale
目的 系统观察阈下抑郁患者应用脑电生物反馈干预3周之后的转归,探索脑电生物反馈对阈下抑郁的干预效果.方法 将符合纳入标准的60例患者按随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例.治疗组采用脑电生物反馈治疗仪进行干预治疗3周,每周治疗2次并评定1次;对照组不采用任何方法干预,观察3周,每周评定1次.连续观察3周和治疗后第6周随访,分别采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和流行病学研究中心调查用抑郁量表(CES-D)对2组患者进行评分和分析,并以HAMD的减分率作为总体疗效标准.结果 对阈下抑郁患者进行脑电生物反馈干预的治疗组疗效优于对照组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).治疗3周后,治疗组痊愈率、显效率和有效率分别为23.33%、70.00%和6.67%,而相应的对照组分别为0.00%、10.00%和16.67%.治疗后,治疗组SDS和CES-D的评分较治疗前均明显下降(P<0.05),且与对照组同时间点组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 脑电生物反馈能有效降低阈下抑郁患者的SDS、HAMD和CES-D评分;脑电生物反馈干预能有效改善患者的症状.
目的 繫統觀察閾下抑鬱患者應用腦電生物反饋榦預3週之後的轉歸,探索腦電生物反饋對閾下抑鬱的榦預效果.方法 將符閤納入標準的60例患者按隨機數字錶法分為治療組和對照組,每組30例.治療組採用腦電生物反饋治療儀進行榦預治療3週,每週治療2次併評定1次;對照組不採用任何方法榦預,觀察3週,每週評定1次.連續觀察3週和治療後第6週隨訪,分彆採用漢密爾頓抑鬱量錶(HAMD)、抑鬱自評量錶(SDS)和流行病學研究中心調查用抑鬱量錶(CES-D)對2組患者進行評分和分析,併以HAMD的減分率作為總體療效標準.結果 對閾下抑鬱患者進行腦電生物反饋榦預的治療組療效優于對照組,且差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).治療3週後,治療組痊愈率、顯效率和有效率分彆為23.33%、70.00%和6.67%,而相應的對照組分彆為0.00%、10.00%和16.67%.治療後,治療組SDS和CES-D的評分較治療前均明顯下降(P<0.05),且與對照組同時間點組間比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 腦電生物反饋能有效降低閾下抑鬱患者的SDS、HAMD和CES-D評分;腦電生物反饋榦預能有效改善患者的癥狀.
목적 계통관찰역하억욱환자응용뇌전생물반궤간예3주지후적전귀,탐색뇌전생물반궤대역하억욱적간예효과.방법 장부합납입표준적60례환자안수궤수자표법분위치료조화대조조,매조30례.치료조채용뇌전생물반궤치료의진행간예치료3주,매주치료2차병평정1차;대조조불채용임하방법간예,관찰3주,매주평정1차.련속관찰3주화치료후제6주수방,분별채용한밀이돈억욱량표(HAMD)、억욱자평량표(SDS)화류행병학연구중심조사용억욱량표(CES-D)대2조환자진행평분화분석,병이HAMD적감분솔작위총체료효표준.결과 대역하억욱환자진행뇌전생물반궤간예적치료조료효우우대조조,차차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).치료3주후,치료조전유솔、현효솔화유효솔분별위23.33%、70.00%화6.67%,이상응적대조조분별위0.00%、10.00%화16.67%.치료후,치료조SDS화CES-D적평분교치료전균명현하강(P<0.05),차여대조조동시간점조간비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 뇌전생물반궤능유효강저역하억욱환자적SDS、HAMD화CES-D평분;뇌전생물반궤간예능유효개선환자적증상.
Objective To explore the effect of electroencephalographic biofeedback (EEGBF) on subclinical depression by observing patients' outcome after 3 weeks of EEGBF intervention.Methods Sixty depressed patients were assigned to a treatment group and a control group using a random digits table,with 30 in each group.Patients in the treatment group received EEGBF twice weekly for 3 weeks and were evaluated once a week; patients in control group were not treated but were also evaluated weekly.The patients were observed for 3 weeks,then followed up 6 weeks after the treatment had ended.Scores on the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD),the self-rating depression scale (SDS) and the Center for Epidemiology survey (CES-D) were analyzed.Reduced HAMD score was regarded as the standard for evaluating the effectiveness of EEGBF.Results The effect in the treated group was significantly better than in the control group.After 3 weeks of treatment,the rate of cure was 23%,excellence was rated 70% and effectiveness was 6.67%.The corresponding ratings for the control group were 0%,10% and 17% respectively.In treated group,SDS and CES-D scores were significantly lower than before treatment and significantly better than in the control group.Conclusion EEGBF can reduce patients' SDS,HAMD and CES-D scores and improve the signs of subclinical depression effectively.