瑞巴派特对阿司匹林所致人胃黏膜上皮细胞损伤的保护作用及其机制
서파파특대아사필림소치인위점막상피세포손상적보호작용급기궤제
Protective effects and its mechanism of rebamipide on aspirin-induced injury in human gastric mucosal epithelium cells
  • 万方数据
    中华消化杂志 중화소화잡지
    Chinese Journal of Digestion
    2014年 7期 453-457 ,共5页

    段兆涛%张振玉%吴海露%袁芳岑%姜宗丹%何帮顺%王书奎

    단조도%장진옥%오해로%원방잠%강종단%하방순%왕서규

    瑞巴派特%阿司匹林%核因子E2相关因子2%血红素氧合酶-1%氧化性应激 瑞巴派特%阿司匹林%覈因子E2相關因子2%血紅素氧閤酶-1%氧化性應激
    서파파특%아사필림%핵인자E2상관인자2%혈홍소양합매-1%양화성응격
    Rebamipide%Aspirin%Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2%Heme oxygenase-1%Oxidative stress
    目的 探讨瑞巴派特对阿司匹林所致人胃黏膜上皮细胞GE91损伤的保护作用及其机制.方法 建立体外培养的GES1单层细胞模型,将细胞分为阴性对照组、阿司匹林损伤组、不同浓度(0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L)瑞巴派特联合阿司匹林组.检测各组细胞增殖情况、丙二醛含量和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性.应用透射电子显微镜观察各组细胞内超微结构改变.采用Western印迹法检测各组细胞中核因子E2相关因子2(Nrf2)、血红素氧合酶1(HO-1)的蛋白表达.进行Nrf2干扰抑制试验,观察Nrf2小干扰RNA对HO-1蛋白表达的影响.多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,两组间比较采用t检验.结果 阿司匹林损伤组,0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L瑞巴派特联合阿司匹林组的细胞存活率分别为(49.56±3.88)％、(59.34±4.36)％、(70.79±5.96)％、(86.07±5.20)％,差异有统计学意义(F=30.634,P＜0.01).与阿司匹林损伤组比较,0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L瑞巴派特联合阿司匹林组GE1细胞中丙二醛含量均显著降低[(2.26±0.25) nmol/mg比(1.85±0.13) rmol/mg比(1.62±0.11) nmol/mg比(1.13±0.15) nmol/mg],差异有统计学意义(F=23.821,P＜0.05).与阿司匹林损伤组比较,0.5、1.0 mmol/L瑞巴派特联合阿司匹林组SOD活性升高[(8.49±0.89) U/mg比(11.50±1.03) U/mg比(13.74±0.76) U/mg],差异有统计学意义(F=25.666,P＜0.05).透射电子显微镜下观察发现经阿司匹林处理后,细胞超微结构明显损伤,而瑞巴派特能减轻细胞损伤.0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L瑞巴派特联合阿司匹林组的Nrf2和HO-1蛋白相对表达量与阿司匹林损伤组比较(0.35±0.04比0.46±0.05比0.84±0.08比0.15±0.02,0.72±0.09比0.93±0.11比L.29±0.14比0.39±0.07),差异均有统计学意义(F=92.550、38.235,P均＜0.05).转染Nrf2小干扰RNA后,阿司匹林损伤组HO-1表达量为0.38±0.04,瑞巴派特联合阿司匹林组HO-1表达量为0.62±0.08,分别低于转染前的0.61±0.05和1.33±0.09,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.276、10.444,P均＜0.05).结论 瑞巴派特可激活Nrf2/HO-1通路,减轻由阿司匹林引起的GES-1细胞的氧化应激损伤.
    목적 탐토서파파특대아사필림소치인위점막상피세포GE91손상적보호작용급기궤제.방법 건입체외배양적GES1단층세포모형,장세포분위음성대조조、아사필림손상조、불동농도(0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L)서파파특연합아사필림조.검측각조세포증식정황、병이철함량화초양화물기화매(SOD)활성.응용투사전자현미경관찰각조세포내초미결구개변.채용Western인적법검측각조세포중핵인자E2상관인자2(Nrf2)、혈홍소양합매1(HO-1)적단백표체.진행Nrf2간우억제시험,관찰Nrf2소간우RNA대HO-1단백표체적영향.다조간비교채용단인소방차분석,량조간비교채용t검험.결과 아사필림손상조,0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L서파파특연합아사필림조적세포존활솔분별위(49.56±3.88)％、(59.34±4.36)％、(70.79±5.96)％、(86.07±5.20)％,차이유통계학의의(F=30.634,P＜0.01).여아사필림손상조비교,0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L서파파특연합아사필림조GE1세포중병이철함량균현저강저[(2.26±0.25) nmol/mg비(1.85±0.13) rmol/mg비(1.62±0.11) nmol/mg비(1.13±0.15) nmol/mg],차이유통계학의의(F=23.821,P＜0.05).여아사필림손상조비교,0.5、1.0 mmol/L서파파특연합아사필림조SOD활성승고[(8.49±0.89) U/mg비(11.50±1.03) U/mg비(13.74±0.76) U/mg],차이유통계학의의(F=25.666,P＜0.05).투사전자현미경하관찰발현경아사필림처리후,세포초미결구명현손상,이서파파특능감경세포손상.0.2、0.5、1.0 mmol/L서파파특연합아사필림조적Nrf2화HO-1단백상대표체량여아사필림손상조비교(0.35±0.04비0.46±0.05비0.84±0.08비0.15±0.02,0.72±0.09비0.93±0.11비L.29±0.14비0.39±0.07),차이균유통계학의의(F=92.550、38.235,P균＜0.05).전염Nrf2소간우RNA후,아사필림손상조HO-1표체량위0.38±0.04,서파파특연합아사필림조HO-1표체량위0.62±0.08,분별저우전염전적0.61±0.05화1.33±0.09,차이균유통계학의의(t=6.276、10.444,P균＜0.05).결론 서파파특가격활Nrf2/HO-1통로,감경유아사필림인기적GES-1세포적양화응격손상.
    Objective To investigate the protective effects and its mechanism of rebamipide on aspirin-induced injury in human gastric mucosal epithelium cells (GES-1).Methods GES-1 cells monolayer culture model was established in vitro.Then the cells were divided into negative control group,aspirin injured group and combination of rebamipide at different concentration (0.2,0.5,1.0 mrnol/L) and aspirin groups.The cell proliferation,the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) of each group were detected.The ultrastructural changes of each group were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).The expressions of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) at protein level in the cells of each group were detected by Western blot.Nrf2 interfering suppression test was performed and then the influence of Nrf2 small interfering RNA (siRNA) on the expression of HO-1 protein was observed.One-way analysis of variance was performed for comparison among multi-groups and t-test was used for comparison between the two groups.Results The cell viability of aspirin injured group and combination of rebamipide at different concentration (0.2,0.5,1.0 mmol/L) and aspirin groups were (49.56±3.88)％,(59.34±4.36) ％,(70.79 ± 5.96) ％ and (86.07 ± 5.20) ％,respectively,and the difference was statistically significant (F=30.634,P＜ 0.01).Compared with aspirin injured group,the content of MDA significantly lowered in combination of rebamipide at different concentration (0.2,0.5,1.0 mmol/L) and aspirin groups ((2.26±0.25) nrnol/rng vs (1.85±0.13) nmol/mg vs (1.62±0.11) nmol/mg vs (1.13±0.15) nmol/mg),and the difference was statistically significant (F=23.821,P＜0.05).Compared with aspirin injured group,the activity of SOD significantly increased in combination of rebamipide at 0.5 and 1.0 mmol/L and aspirin groups ((8.49±0.89) U/rng vs (11.50±1.03) U/mg vs (13.74±0.76) U/mg),the difference was statistically significant (F=25.666,P＜0.05).Under TEM,the cell ultrastrucmral was obviously inured in aspirin treated,while rebamipide could relieve the injury.The differences of relative expression quantity of Nrf2 and HO-1 at protein level among combination of rebamipide at 0.2,0.5 and 1.0 mmol/L and aspirin groups and aspirin injured group were statistically significant (0.35±0.04 vs 0.46± 0.05 vs 0.84±0.08 vs 0.15±0.02,0.72±0.09 vs 0.93±0.11 vs 1.29±0.14 vs 0.39±0.07,F=92.550and 38.235,both P＜0.05).After transfected with Nrf2 siRNA,the expression of HO-1 was 0.38±0.04 in aspirin injured group and 0.62±0.08 in combination of rebamipide and aspirin group,which was lower than that before transfection (0.61 ± 0.05,1.33± 0.09),respectively.The differences were statistically significant (t =6.276 and 10.444,both P＜0.05).Conclusion Rebamipide may activate Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and relieve aspiriwinduced oxidative stress in GF1 ceils.
    원문보기 원문다운로드 사이트로이동
저자의 최근 논문