中华心律失常学杂志
中華心律失常學雜誌
중화심률실상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS
2012年
5期
362-364,386
,共4页
冯天捷%陈柯萍%姚焰%马坚%方丕华%华伟%张澍
馮天捷%陳柯萍%姚燄%馬堅%方丕華%華偉%張澍
풍천첩%진가평%요염%마견%방비화%화위%장주
阵发性心房颤动%导管消融%起搏器%复发
陣髮性心房顫動%導管消融%起搏器%複髮
진발성심방전동%도관소융%기박기%복발
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation%Catheter ablation%Pacemaker%Recurrence
目的 对导管消融治疗阵发性心房颤动(房颤)合并窦房结功能障碍植入永久起搏器治疗的患者进行分析,比较传统心电图记录判断房颤复发率与起搏器程控记录模式转换事件判断房颤复发率有无差别.方法 所有患者因阵发性房颤接受导管消融治疗,因合并病态窦房结综合征于导管消融前后植入双腔起搏器治疗.消融术后3个月随访开始记录房颤发作情况.分别通过传统记录方式(心电图、24 h动态心电图)和起搏器程控记录(模式转换事件)判断房颤复发情况.结果 共40例(男28例)患者纳入研究,平均年龄(46.00±9.37)岁,左心室射血分数0.52 ~0.73 (0.61±0.03),左心房内径31.00 ~38.00(34.00±6.56)mm,随访4.5~42.0(25.0±8.2)个月.随访结束时,38例患者维持窦性心律.根据临床症状、心电图、24 h动态心电图诊断房颤复发10例(25%);根据起搏器程控记录房颤复发16例(40%).结论 合并病态窦房结综合征的阵发性房颤患者,需要植入永久起搏器.导管消融术后根据心电图和起搏器腔内电图判断房颤的复发率有无差别.
目的 對導管消融治療陣髮性心房顫動(房顫)閤併竇房結功能障礙植入永久起搏器治療的患者進行分析,比較傳統心電圖記錄判斷房顫複髮率與起搏器程控記錄模式轉換事件判斷房顫複髮率有無差彆.方法 所有患者因陣髮性房顫接受導管消融治療,因閤併病態竇房結綜閤徵于導管消融前後植入雙腔起搏器治療.消融術後3箇月隨訪開始記錄房顫髮作情況.分彆通過傳統記錄方式(心電圖、24 h動態心電圖)和起搏器程控記錄(模式轉換事件)判斷房顫複髮情況.結果 共40例(男28例)患者納入研究,平均年齡(46.00±9.37)歲,左心室射血分數0.52 ~0.73 (0.61±0.03),左心房內徑31.00 ~38.00(34.00±6.56)mm,隨訪4.5~42.0(25.0±8.2)箇月.隨訪結束時,38例患者維持竇性心律.根據臨床癥狀、心電圖、24 h動態心電圖診斷房顫複髮10例(25%);根據起搏器程控記錄房顫複髮16例(40%).結論 閤併病態竇房結綜閤徵的陣髮性房顫患者,需要植入永久起搏器.導管消融術後根據心電圖和起搏器腔內電圖判斷房顫的複髮率有無差彆.
목적 대도관소융치료진발성심방전동(방전)합병두방결공능장애식입영구기박기치료적환자진행분석,비교전통심전도기록판단방전복발솔여기박기정공기록모식전환사건판단방전복발솔유무차별.방법 소유환자인진발성방전접수도관소융치료,인합병병태두방결종합정우도관소융전후식입쌍강기박기치료.소융술후3개월수방개시기록방전발작정황.분별통과전통기록방식(심전도、24 h동태심전도)화기박기정공기록(모식전환사건)판단방전복발정황.결과 공40례(남28례)환자납입연구,평균년령(46.00±9.37)세,좌심실사혈분수0.52 ~0.73 (0.61±0.03),좌심방내경31.00 ~38.00(34.00±6.56)mm,수방4.5~42.0(25.0±8.2)개월.수방결속시,38례환자유지두성심률.근거림상증상、심전도、24 h동태심전도진단방전복발10례(25%);근거기박기정공기록방전복발16례(40%).결론 합병병태두방결종합정적진발성방전환자,수요식입영구기박기.도관소융술후근거심전도화기박기강내전도판단방전적복발솔유무차별.
Objective To describe the difference of atrial fibrillation(AF) recurrence rate of paroxysmal AF in patients with pacemaker implantation and to compare electrocardiogram(ECG) Holter and pacemaker auto mode switch recordings after catheter ablation.Methods All of the patients received catheter ablation and pacemaker implantation because of paroxysmal AF and sick sinus syndrome.The follow-up began at the third month after catheter ablation.The recurrence rate of AF after catheter ablation was judged by two methods:the recordings of ECG or Holter and the recordings of auto mode switch in dual chamber pacemaker.Results Forty patients (28 males) underwent catheter ablation for parosxymal AF,average age was (46.00±9.37) years,with left ventricular ejection fraction 0.52 ~ 0.73 (0.61 ±0.03),and left atrial dimension 31.00 ~ 38.00 (34.00 ±6.56)mm.Thirty-eight patients (95%)maintained sinus rhythm at the end of the follow-up.Ten patients (25%) were detected recurrence of AF through ECG/Holter recordings after catheter ablation,and 16 patients (40%) were detected recurrence of AF through pacemaker auto mode switch recording after catheter ablation.Conclusions The patients suffered paroxyomal AF with sick sinus syndrome should be implanted pacemaker for slow arrhythmia no matter whether receiving catheter ablation.There was difference in recurrence of AF after catheter ablation the recordings of ECG/Holter and auto mode swithrecordings.