中华心律失常学杂志
中華心律失常學雜誌
중화심률실상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS
2013年
2期
134-137
,共4页
卢孔杰%孙国建%陈建明%何浪%袁高辉%韦凡平%程震锋
盧孔傑%孫國建%陳建明%何浪%袁高輝%韋凡平%程震鋒
로공걸%손국건%진건명%하랑%원고휘%위범평%정진봉
植入型心律转复除颤器%心脏再同步治疗除颤器%心脏性猝死%一级预防
植入型心律轉複除顫器%心髒再同步治療除顫器%心髒性猝死%一級預防
식입형심률전복제전기%심장재동보치료제전기%심장성졸사%일급예방
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator%Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator%Sudden cardiac death%prevention
目的 分析植入型心律转复除颤器(ICD)及心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)一级预防患者的室性心律失常发生情况.方法 统计分析2007年1月至2012年6月在浙江医院因一级预防而植入ICD或CRT-D的所有患者.结果 140例患者中,植入ICD的患者51例,CRT-D患者89例,平均随访(26.8±12.6)个月.结果显示在ICD一级预防中启动ICD正确治疗的室性心律失常发生率为19.3%,误治疗率为12.9%,其中误治疗中85.3%发生在单腔ICD一级预防中.ICD一级预防中主要死亡原因为心力衰竭(52.2%),非心脏原因死亡(39.1%).ICD正确治疗组与未治疗组相比,宽QRS时限、低左心室射血分数(LVEF)及高B型脑钠肽(NT-proBNP)容易导致室性心律失常发生.结论 在ICD或CRT-D一级预防患者中,宽QRS时限、低LVEF及高NT-proBNP容易导致室性心律失常发生;ICD误治疗主要发生在单腔ICD患者.
目的 分析植入型心律轉複除顫器(ICD)及心髒再同步治療除顫器(CRT-D)一級預防患者的室性心律失常髮生情況.方法 統計分析2007年1月至2012年6月在浙江醫院因一級預防而植入ICD或CRT-D的所有患者.結果 140例患者中,植入ICD的患者51例,CRT-D患者89例,平均隨訪(26.8±12.6)箇月.結果顯示在ICD一級預防中啟動ICD正確治療的室性心律失常髮生率為19.3%,誤治療率為12.9%,其中誤治療中85.3%髮生在單腔ICD一級預防中.ICD一級預防中主要死亡原因為心力衰竭(52.2%),非心髒原因死亡(39.1%).ICD正確治療組與未治療組相比,寬QRS時限、低左心室射血分數(LVEF)及高B型腦鈉肽(NT-proBNP)容易導緻室性心律失常髮生.結論 在ICD或CRT-D一級預防患者中,寬QRS時限、低LVEF及高NT-proBNP容易導緻室性心律失常髮生;ICD誤治療主要髮生在單腔ICD患者.
목적 분석식입형심률전복제전기(ICD)급심장재동보치료제전기(CRT-D)일급예방환자적실성심률실상발생정황.방법 통계분석2007년1월지2012년6월재절강의원인일급예방이식입ICD혹CRT-D적소유환자.결과 140례환자중,식입ICD적환자51례,CRT-D환자89례,평균수방(26.8±12.6)개월.결과현시재ICD일급예방중계동ICD정학치료적실성심률실상발생솔위19.3%,오치료솔위12.9%,기중오치료중85.3%발생재단강ICD일급예방중.ICD일급예방중주요사망원인위심력쇠갈(52.2%),비심장원인사망(39.1%).ICD정학치료조여미치료조상비,관QRS시한、저좌심실사혈분수(LVEF)급고B형뇌납태(NT-proBNP)용역도치실성심률실상발생.결론 재ICD혹CRT-D일급예방환자중,관QRS시한、저LVEF급고NT-proBNP용역도치실성심률실상발생;ICD오치료주요발생재단강ICD환자.
Objective To evaluate the effect of implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD)and Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D)for primary prevention in patients with ventricular arrhythmia.Method Statistical analysis was performedincollected data fromall patients from 2007 to 2012 in Zhejiang Hospital implanted for primary prevention ICD or CRT-D.Results A total of 140 patients implanted ICD or CRT-Dwereenrolled in this study,51 patients with ICD,89patients with CRT-D,with an average followup of 26.8±12.6 months.Recordings showed that correct treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in ICD primary prevention was 19.3%,misuse treatment rate was12.9%,which mistakenly treatment was85.3%.The leading cause of death in the ICD for primary prevention washeart failure deaths (52.2%) and non-cardiac causes of death(39.1%).Theindicators ofventricular arrhythmiasincluded a wide QRS duration,low LVEF and high NT-proBNP.ConclusionsIn patients with primary prevention ICD or CRT-D,wider QRS duration,lower LVEF and higher NT-proBNPwere the risk factors of ventricular arrhythmias ; ICD Inappropriate therapyoccurred mainly in patients with single-chamber ICD.