中华眼底病杂志
中華眼底病雜誌
중화안저병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OCULAR FUNDUS DISEASES
2014年
3期
241-244
,共4页
韦春宜%刘冉%李加青%杨宇%丁小燕
韋春宜%劉冉%李加青%楊宇%丁小燕
위춘의%류염%리가청%양우%정소연
诊断显像%体层摄影术,光学相干%脉络膜疾病/治疗%光化学疗法%抗体,单克隆
診斷顯像%體層攝影術,光學相榦%脈絡膜疾病/治療%光化學療法%抗體,單剋隆
진단현상%체층섭영술,광학상간%맥락막질병/치료%광화학요법%항체,단극륭
Diagnostic imaging%Tomography,optical coherence%Choroid diseases/therapy%Photochemotherapy%Antibodies,monoclonal
目的 观察息肉样脉络膜血管病变(PCV)患者频域光相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)图像特征与光动力疗法(PDT)联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗视力预后的相关性.方法 吲哚青绿血管造影(ICGA)检查确诊的PCV患者26例26只眼纳入研究.所有患者治疗前、治疗后1、3、6个月行最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、裂隙灯显微镜联合前置镜、SD-OCT、荧光素眼底血管造影(FFA)、吲哚青绿血管造影(ICGA)检查.患眼基线平均BCVA(31.46±16.87)个字母;平均中心凹视网膜厚度(CRT) (581.19±309.05) μm;平均中心凹下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)(248.92±95.45)μm.根据联合治疗后6个月时BCVA改变情况,将患眼分为治疗敏感组(GR组)和治疗不敏感组(PR组),分别为17、9只眼.GR组17例中,男性12例,女性5例;平均年龄(65.24±7.03)岁;平均CRT为(619.06±335.07) μm;平均SFCT(271.24±106.61) μm.存在视网膜出血(SRH)、视网膜层间积液(IRF)、视网膜下液(SRF)、色素上皮脱离(PED)者分别为4、2、13、15只跟.PR组9例中,男性8例,女性1例;平均年龄(64.00±7.02)岁;平均CRT为(509.67±255.21) μm;平均SFCT(271.24±106.61) μm.存在SRH、IRF、PED者分别为6、5、6、8只眼.两组间性别、平均年龄、平均CRT、平均SFCT比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).比较两组基线时SD-OCT图像特征各参数与治疗后BCVA的关系,并行logistic回归分析.结果 治疗后1、2、3、6个月患眼平均BCVA分别为(38.46±19.81)、(40.04±20.80)、(42.96±21.63)、(43.77±20.91)个字母.治疗后6个月,GR组、PR组平均CRT分别为(360.71±276.54)、(341.44±193.68) μm.两组平均CRT比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).GR组SFCT≥263 μm者11只眼,占GR组患眼的64.71%.PR组SFCT≥263 μm者2只眼,占PR组患眼的22..22%.两组间SFCT≥263 μm者构成比比较,差异有统计学意义[比值比(OR):0.052,95%可信间区(CI):0.005~0.533;P=0.013].Logistic回归分析结果显示,治疗前存在IRF(OR=9.375,95%CI 1.299~67.645;P=0.026)、SRH(OR=6.500,95%CI 1.094~38.633;P=0.040)者对治疗反应差.结论 SFCT厚者对治疗敏感;治疗前存在IRF、SRH是影响治疗后视力的危险因素.
目的 觀察息肉樣脈絡膜血管病變(PCV)患者頻域光相榦斷層掃描(SD-OCT)圖像特徵與光動力療法(PDT)聯閤玻璃體腔註射雷珠單抗治療視力預後的相關性.方法 吲哚青綠血管造影(ICGA)檢查確診的PCV患者26例26隻眼納入研究.所有患者治療前、治療後1、3、6箇月行最佳矯正視力(BCVA)、裂隙燈顯微鏡聯閤前置鏡、SD-OCT、熒光素眼底血管造影(FFA)、吲哚青綠血管造影(ICGA)檢查.患眼基線平均BCVA(31.46±16.87)箇字母;平均中心凹視網膜厚度(CRT) (581.19±309.05) μm;平均中心凹下脈絡膜厚度(SFCT)(248.92±95.45)μm.根據聯閤治療後6箇月時BCVA改變情況,將患眼分為治療敏感組(GR組)和治療不敏感組(PR組),分彆為17、9隻眼.GR組17例中,男性12例,女性5例;平均年齡(65.24±7.03)歲;平均CRT為(619.06±335.07) μm;平均SFCT(271.24±106.61) μm.存在視網膜齣血(SRH)、視網膜層間積液(IRF)、視網膜下液(SRF)、色素上皮脫離(PED)者分彆為4、2、13、15隻跟.PR組9例中,男性8例,女性1例;平均年齡(64.00±7.02)歲;平均CRT為(509.67±255.21) μm;平均SFCT(271.24±106.61) μm.存在SRH、IRF、PED者分彆為6、5、6、8隻眼.兩組間性彆、平均年齡、平均CRT、平均SFCT比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).比較兩組基線時SD-OCT圖像特徵各參數與治療後BCVA的關繫,併行logistic迴歸分析.結果 治療後1、2、3、6箇月患眼平均BCVA分彆為(38.46±19.81)、(40.04±20.80)、(42.96±21.63)、(43.77±20.91)箇字母.治療後6箇月,GR組、PR組平均CRT分彆為(360.71±276.54)、(341.44±193.68) μm.兩組平均CRT比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).GR組SFCT≥263 μm者11隻眼,佔GR組患眼的64.71%.PR組SFCT≥263 μm者2隻眼,佔PR組患眼的22..22%.兩組間SFCT≥263 μm者構成比比較,差異有統計學意義[比值比(OR):0.052,95%可信間區(CI):0.005~0.533;P=0.013].Logistic迴歸分析結果顯示,治療前存在IRF(OR=9.375,95%CI 1.299~67.645;P=0.026)、SRH(OR=6.500,95%CI 1.094~38.633;P=0.040)者對治療反應差.結論 SFCT厚者對治療敏感;治療前存在IRF、SRH是影響治療後視力的危險因素.
목적 관찰식육양맥락막혈관병변(PCV)환자빈역광상간단층소묘(SD-OCT)도상특정여광동력요법(PDT)연합파리체강주사뢰주단항치료시력예후적상관성.방법 신타청록혈관조영(ICGA)검사학진적PCV환자26례26지안납입연구.소유환자치료전、치료후1、3、6개월행최가교정시력(BCVA)、렬극등현미경연합전치경、SD-OCT、형광소안저혈관조영(FFA)、신타청록혈관조영(ICGA)검사.환안기선평균BCVA(31.46±16.87)개자모;평균중심요시망막후도(CRT) (581.19±309.05) μm;평균중심요하맥락막후도(SFCT)(248.92±95.45)μm.근거연합치료후6개월시BCVA개변정황,장환안분위치료민감조(GR조)화치료불민감조(PR조),분별위17、9지안.GR조17례중,남성12례,녀성5례;평균년령(65.24±7.03)세;평균CRT위(619.06±335.07) μm;평균SFCT(271.24±106.61) μm.존재시망막출혈(SRH)、시망막층간적액(IRF)、시망막하액(SRF)、색소상피탈리(PED)자분별위4、2、13、15지근.PR조9례중,남성8례,녀성1례;평균년령(64.00±7.02)세;평균CRT위(509.67±255.21) μm;평균SFCT(271.24±106.61) μm.존재SRH、IRF、PED자분별위6、5、6、8지안.량조간성별、평균년령、평균CRT、평균SFCT비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).비교량조기선시SD-OCT도상특정각삼수여치료후BCVA적관계,병행logistic회귀분석.결과 치료후1、2、3、6개월환안평균BCVA분별위(38.46±19.81)、(40.04±20.80)、(42.96±21.63)、(43.77±20.91)개자모.치료후6개월,GR조、PR조평균CRT분별위(360.71±276.54)、(341.44±193.68) μm.량조평균CRT비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).GR조SFCT≥263 μm자11지안,점GR조환안적64.71%.PR조SFCT≥263 μm자2지안,점PR조환안적22..22%.량조간SFCT≥263 μm자구성비비교,차이유통계학의의[비치비(OR):0.052,95%가신간구(CI):0.005~0.533;P=0.013].Logistic회귀분석결과현시,치료전존재IRF(OR=9.375,95%CI 1.299~67.645;P=0.026)、SRH(OR=6.500,95%CI 1.094~38.633;P=0.040)자대치료반응차.결론 SFCT후자대치료민감;치료전존재IRF、SRH시영향치료후시력적위험인소.
Objective To evaluate the spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) characteristics of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and its correlation with the visual acuity after photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal ranibizumab.Methods Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients with PCV diagnosed by indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) were enrolled in this study.All the patients were examined for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),slit lamp microscope,SD-OCT,fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and ICGA before and 1,3 months after treatment.The mean baseline BCVA was (31.46±16.87) letters,mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was (581.19±309.05) μm,and mean subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was (248.92±95.45) μm.Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the final visual improvement after 6 month of treatment:GR or sensitive Group (17 eyes) and PR or non-sensitive Group (9 eyes).GR group included 12 males and 5 females,with a mean age of (65.24± 7.03) years,a mean CRT of (619.06±335.07) μm and a mean SFCT of (271.24±±106.61) μm.There were 4 eyes with subretinal hemorrhage (SRH),2 eyes with interface retinal fluid (IRF),13 eyes with subretinal fluids (SRF) and 15 eyes with pigment epithelial detachment (PED).PR group included 8 males and 1female,with a mean age of (64.00±7.02) years,a mean CRT of (509.67±255.21) μm and a mean SFCT of (271.24 ± 106.61) μm.There were 6 eyes with subretinal hemorrhage (SRH),5 eyes with interface retinal fluid (IRF),6 eyes with subretinal fluids (SRF) and 8 eyes with pigment epithelial detachment (PED).The difference of sex,age,CRT and SFCT between these two groups was not significant (P> 0.05).The relationship of baseline SD-OCT and post-treatment BCVA was analyzed.Results On 1,2,3,6 months after treatment,the BCVA were (38.46±19.81),(40.04±20.80),(42.96±21.63),(43.77±20.91) letters respectively.On 6 months after treatment,the mean CRT in GR and PR group were (360.71±276.54),(341.44±193.68) μmrespectively (P>0.05).64.71% (11/17) eyes in GR group and 22.22% (2/9) eyes in PR group had a SFCT thicker than 263μm.The difference was statistical significant between two groups [odds ratio (OR):0.052,95 % confidence interval (CI):0.005-0.533; P=0.013].Logistic regression analysis showed that existence of IRF (OR=9.375,95% CI:1.299-67.645 ; P=0.026) or SRH (OR=6.500,95%CI:1.094-38.633 ; P=0.040) at baseline was negative prognostic factor to treatment.Conclusion Thick SFCT is a protective factor,however,existence of IRF or SRH at baseline is negative prognostic factor of final visual improvement.