中华眼科杂志
中華眼科雜誌
중화안과잡지
Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
2013年
1期
52-57
,共6页
李娜%杨秀芬%顾虹%邓禹%徐军%马凯%刘宁朴
李娜%楊秀芬%顧虹%鄧禹%徐軍%馬凱%劉寧樸
리나%양수분%고홍%산우%서군%마개%류저박
肽基二肽酶A%多态现象,遗传%糖尿病视网膜病变%病例对照研究
肽基二肽酶A%多態現象,遺傳%糖尿病視網膜病變%病例對照研究
태기이태매A%다태현상,유전%당뇨병시망막병변%병례대조연구
Peptidyl-dipeptidase A%Polymorphism,genetic%Diabetic retinopathy%Casecontrol studies
目的 探讨血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)基因rs1799752位点插入或缺失(I/D)多态性与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的相关性.方法 病例对照研究.选择2型糖尿病患者412例,其中DR组207例,糖尿病无视网膜病变(DWR)组205例;DR组中筛选出增生性DR (PDR)患者53例,作为PDR组;收集同源非糖尿病志愿者97例作为对照人群.采用PCR和琼脂糖凝胶电泳技术检测ACE基因rs1799752位点I/D多态性基因型.组间基因型及等位基因频率比较采用x2检验.符合正态分布的连续变量组间比较采用t检验或方差分析,不符合正态分布的连续变量组间比较采用秩和检验.对疾病发生相关因素进行logistic回归分析.结果 ACE基因rs1799752位点的I和D等位基因频率:DR组分别为54.1%和45.9%,PDR组分别为52.8%和47.2%,DWR组分别为48.0%和52.0%;DR组与DWR组、PDR组与DWR组的等位基因频率比较,差异均无统计学意义(x2 =3.02,0.77;P>0.05).I/D基因型分布:DR组分别为Ⅱ 25.1%,ID 58.0%,DD 16.9%;DWR组分别为Ⅱ 22.0%,ID52.2%,DD 25.9%,PDR组分别为Ⅱ 20.7%,ID 64.2%,DD 15.1%;DR组与DWR组和PDR组的I/D基因型分布差异均无统计学意义(x2 =4.92,3.19;P >0.05).糖尿病组与非糖尿病组之间的I和D等位基因频率及I/D基因型分布差异均无统计学意义(x2 =0.25,4.98;P >0.05).在多因素回归分析模型中,纳入患者确诊糖尿病时的年龄、尿微量白蛋白定量检测结果、胰岛素应用情况,肌酐、糖化血红蛋白、血糖检测结果,ACE抑制剂使用情况等作为变量进行分析,显示I/D位点基因多态性与DR(OR=0.80,95% CI:0.59~ 1.09)和PDR(OR=1.23,95% CI:0.78~1.93)发病无相关性.结论 ACE基因I/D多态性与2型糖尿病患者DR的发病无明显相关性.
目的 探討血管緊張素轉換酶(ACE)基因rs1799752位點插入或缺失(I/D)多態性與糖尿病視網膜病變(DR)的相關性.方法 病例對照研究.選擇2型糖尿病患者412例,其中DR組207例,糖尿病無視網膜病變(DWR)組205例;DR組中篩選齣增生性DR (PDR)患者53例,作為PDR組;收集同源非糖尿病誌願者97例作為對照人群.採用PCR和瓊脂糖凝膠電泳技術檢測ACE基因rs1799752位點I/D多態性基因型.組間基因型及等位基因頻率比較採用x2檢驗.符閤正態分佈的連續變量組間比較採用t檢驗或方差分析,不符閤正態分佈的連續變量組間比較採用秩和檢驗.對疾病髮生相關因素進行logistic迴歸分析.結果 ACE基因rs1799752位點的I和D等位基因頻率:DR組分彆為54.1%和45.9%,PDR組分彆為52.8%和47.2%,DWR組分彆為48.0%和52.0%;DR組與DWR組、PDR組與DWR組的等位基因頻率比較,差異均無統計學意義(x2 =3.02,0.77;P>0.05).I/D基因型分佈:DR組分彆為Ⅱ 25.1%,ID 58.0%,DD 16.9%;DWR組分彆為Ⅱ 22.0%,ID52.2%,DD 25.9%,PDR組分彆為Ⅱ 20.7%,ID 64.2%,DD 15.1%;DR組與DWR組和PDR組的I/D基因型分佈差異均無統計學意義(x2 =4.92,3.19;P >0.05).糖尿病組與非糖尿病組之間的I和D等位基因頻率及I/D基因型分佈差異均無統計學意義(x2 =0.25,4.98;P >0.05).在多因素迴歸分析模型中,納入患者確診糖尿病時的年齡、尿微量白蛋白定量檢測結果、胰島素應用情況,肌酐、糖化血紅蛋白、血糖檢測結果,ACE抑製劑使用情況等作為變量進行分析,顯示I/D位點基因多態性與DR(OR=0.80,95% CI:0.59~ 1.09)和PDR(OR=1.23,95% CI:0.78~1.93)髮病無相關性.結論 ACE基因I/D多態性與2型糖尿病患者DR的髮病無明顯相關性.
목적 탐토혈관긴장소전환매(ACE)기인rs1799752위점삽입혹결실(I/D)다태성여당뇨병시망막병변(DR)적상관성.방법 병례대조연구.선택2형당뇨병환자412례,기중DR조207례,당뇨병무시망막병변(DWR)조205례;DR조중사선출증생성DR (PDR)환자53례,작위PDR조;수집동원비당뇨병지원자97례작위대조인군.채용PCR화경지당응효전영기술검측ACE기인rs1799752위점I/D다태성기인형.조간기인형급등위기인빈솔비교채용x2검험.부합정태분포적련속변량조간비교채용t검험혹방차분석,불부합정태분포적련속변량조간비교채용질화검험.대질병발생상관인소진행logistic회귀분석.결과 ACE기인rs1799752위점적I화D등위기인빈솔:DR조분별위54.1%화45.9%,PDR조분별위52.8%화47.2%,DWR조분별위48.0%화52.0%;DR조여DWR조、PDR조여DWR조적등위기인빈솔비교,차이균무통계학의의(x2 =3.02,0.77;P>0.05).I/D기인형분포:DR조분별위Ⅱ 25.1%,ID 58.0%,DD 16.9%;DWR조분별위Ⅱ 22.0%,ID52.2%,DD 25.9%,PDR조분별위Ⅱ 20.7%,ID 64.2%,DD 15.1%;DR조여DWR조화PDR조적I/D기인형분포차이균무통계학의의(x2 =4.92,3.19;P >0.05).당뇨병조여비당뇨병조지간적I화D등위기인빈솔급I/D기인형분포차이균무통계학의의(x2 =0.25,4.98;P >0.05).재다인소회귀분석모형중,납입환자학진당뇨병시적년령、뇨미량백단백정량검측결과、이도소응용정황,기항、당화혈홍단백、혈당검측결과,ACE억제제사용정황등작위변량진행분석,현시I/D위점기인다태성여DR(OR=0.80,95% CI:0.59~ 1.09)화PDR(OR=1.23,95% CI:0.78~1.93)발병무상관성.결론 ACE기인I/D다태성여2형당뇨병환자DR적발병무명현상관성.
Objective To investigate the association between angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene locus rs1799752 insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods Case-control study.Type 2 diabetes patients were recruited and assigned into DR group,which included proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group or diabetes without retinopathy (DWR) group.Volunteers without diabetes from the same community were recruited as the control group.PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis methods were adopted to determine the rs1799752 I/D polymorphism genotypes of the ACE gene.The frequency of genotypes and alleles was compared among the various groups.Results Four hundred and twelve diabetes patients:(207 subjects of DR,including 53 subjects of PDR and 205 subjects of DWR) and 97 non-diabetic control subjects were included in the study.The frequencies of the I and D alleles of ACE rs1799752 polymorphism were 54.1% and 45.9%,respectively,in the DR group,52.8% and 47.2% in the PDR group,and 48.0% and 52.0% in the DWR group.There were no statistical differences between DR and DWR groups (x2 =3.02,P > 0.05) or between PDR and DWR groups (x2 =0.77,P > 0.05).Moreover,there were no statistical differences in the distribution of the ACE genotypes between DR group (Ⅱ 25.1%,ID 58.0%,DD 16.9%) and DWR gronp (Ⅱ 22.0%,ID 52.2%,DD 25.9%) (x2 =4.92,P > 0.05) or between PDR group (Ⅱ 20.7%,ID 64.2%,DD 15.1%) and DWR group (x2 =3.19,P>0.05).No statistical differences were found in the frequencies of the I and D alleles,and the distributions of I/D genotypes between diabetic group and the control group (x2 =0.25,4.98 ; P > 0.05).In the multiple regressions model including clinical factors such as the age of onset of diabetes,urinary albumin,insulin usage,creatinine,glycated hemoglobin,fast glucose,and the use of ACE inhibitor,no association was found between ACE gene polymorphism and DR (0R=0.80,95%CI:0.59-1.09) or PDR(OR=1.23,95%CI:0.78-1.93).Conclusion There is no association between ACE rs1799752 gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and DR in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.