中华医史杂志
中華醫史雜誌
중화의사잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE HISTORY
2014年
3期
135-137
,共3页
李光燕%王德群%方士英%徐茂红
李光燕%王德群%方士英%徐茂紅
리광연%왕덕군%방사영%서무홍
木香%沉香%《神农本草经》
木香%沉香%《神農本草經》
목향%침향%《신농본초경》
Costus root%Eaglewood%Sheng nong ben cao jing (Shennong's Classic of Materia Medica)
中药木香最早记载于《神农本草经》.通过考察多种本草文献,发现《神农本草经》中的木香可能不是现代菊科木香类植物,而是沉香,因为从形态、气味、功效等方面综合判断,沉香与《本神农草经》中的木香相吻合.《神农本草经》中只有“木香”,而无“沉香”,陶弘景将“木香”与“沉香”一并记载于《名医别录》中,为后人的误识埋下了伏笔.自《唐本草》始认为“木香”主要为菊科的木香类草本植物,这种认识一直影响至今.马兜铃科藤本青木香在《唐本草》和《本草图经》等本草著作的“木香”条中均有记载,但不做“木香”药用的主流.
中藥木香最早記載于《神農本草經》.通過攷察多種本草文獻,髮現《神農本草經》中的木香可能不是現代菊科木香類植物,而是沉香,因為從形態、氣味、功效等方麵綜閤判斷,沉香與《本神農草經》中的木香相吻閤.《神農本草經》中隻有“木香”,而無“沉香”,陶弘景將“木香”與“沉香”一併記載于《名醫彆錄》中,為後人的誤識埋下瞭伏筆.自《唐本草》始認為“木香”主要為菊科的木香類草本植物,這種認識一直影響至今.馬兜鈴科籐本青木香在《唐本草》和《本草圖經》等本草著作的“木香”條中均有記載,但不做“木香”藥用的主流.
중약목향최조기재우《신농본초경》.통과고찰다충본초문헌,발현《신농본초경》중적목향가능불시현대국과목향류식물,이시침향,인위종형태、기미、공효등방면종합판단,침향여《본신농초경》중적목향상문합.《신농본초경》중지유“목향”,이무“침향”,도홍경장“목향”여“침향”일병기재우《명의별록》중,위후인적오식매하료복필.자《당본초》시인위“목향”주요위국과적목향류초본식물,저충인식일직영향지금.마두령과등본청목향재《당본초》화《본초도경》등본초저작적“목향”조중균유기재,단불주“목향”약용적주류.
Aucklandia lappa Decne was first recorded in the Sheng nong ben cao jing (Shennong's Classic ofMateria Medica).Through the textual research of herbal literature,it was found that the costus root in the Sheng nong ben cao jing perhaps was not the plant of Aucklandia lappa Decne of Compositae,but the eaglewood or Lignum Aquilasria Resinatum based on the comprehensive judgment of shape,taste,nature,and function etc.In the Sheng nong ben cao jing,it only includes costus root without the title of eaglewood,and Tao Hongjing recorded both herbs together in his Ming yi bie lu (Supplementary Records of Celebrated Physicians),which became a foreshadow of misunderstanding of the later generations.Beginning from the Tang ben cao (Materia Medica of the Tang Dynasty),the costus root was considered as the plant of Auckiandia lappa Decne from the Compostae with its profound influence until now.