CAJ | 학술논문

为探寻科技计划立项课题申请人学科领域前期研究基础的科研管理方法,采用预设的“立项研究基础综合评价量表”,对135位人口与健康领域国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目中标人相应领域的科研基础进行计量分析.结果显示:135位课题中标人的立项基础综合得分平均为9.35±11.13,最高分为57.21分,5位课题中标人的得分为0分；得分散点图示呈高分区稀少、得分点密集下沉在底层的偏态分布.建议建立合理化、标准化、定量化的前期科研基础评价体系,为评审专家及科研立项管理部门提供客观的科研基础评价结果作为评审和决策参考.
위탐심과기계화립항과제신청인학과영역전기연구기출적과연관리방법,채용예설적“립항연구기출종합평개량표”,대135위인구여건강영역국가“십일오”과기지탱계화항목중표인상응영역적과연기출진행계량분석.결과현시:135위과제중표인적립항기출종합득분평균위9.35±11.13,최고분위57.21분,5위과제중표인적득분위0분；득분산점도시정고분구희소、득분점밀집하침재저층적편태분포.건의건립합이화、표준화、정양화적전기과연기출평개체계,위평심전가급과연립항관리부문제공객관적과연기출평개결과작위평심화결책삼고.
In order to explore the scientific research management methods about the applicant's pre-research foundation of the science program,the paper comprehensively and quantitatively evaluated the 135 winning bidders' scientific research foundation of the National Population and Health Technology Supporting Program during the 11th Five-Year Plan Period,with the predefined "the comprehensive evaluation scale of approval project foundation".The results showed that:the average of comprehensive total score of 135 bidders' approval project foundation is 9.35 ± 11.13,and the highest is 57.21 points.At the same time,five winning bidders' score is 0.The scatter of points suggested a skewed distribution that few bidders is in the high partitions,while score points densely sink at the bottom.The proposal is to set up a reasonable,standardized,quantified evaluation system of the pre scientific research foundation,which to provide review and decision-making reference for the evaluation experts and the project management departments.