中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2013年
5期
357-360
,共4页
李秀芳%李韶霞%左慧慧%王宇江%降凌燕
李秀芳%李韶霞%左慧慧%王宇江%降凌燕
리수방%리소하%좌혜혜%왕우강%강릉연
社会网络分析法%国际疾病分类%作者合著网络
社會網絡分析法%國際疾病分類%作者閤著網絡
사회망락분석법%국제질병분류%작자합저망락
Social Network Analysis%International Classification of Diseases%Co-authoring Network
目的运用社会网络分析法探讨国内国际疾病分类领域作者合著现象.方法利用UCINET软件从网络密度、点度中心性、中间中心性、接近中心性和凝聚子群5个角度进行分析.结果作者合著网络密度为0.0021,网络中主成分节点占所有节点总数的3.46%,点度中心性值最高的节点是林洁中,而中间中心性和接近中心性值最高的节点均为郭蕴青,1851个作者构成44个2-丛.结论 目前国内该领域作者合著关系不紧密,但在一定程度上林洁中、梁耀、李建炜、范炜、郭蕴青、刘爱民等作者属于该领域的核心成员或意见领袖.从整体角度来看,该网络目前尚未形成明显的小团体现象,组织结构比较松散、孤立.
目的運用社會網絡分析法探討國內國際疾病分類領域作者閤著現象.方法利用UCINET軟件從網絡密度、點度中心性、中間中心性、接近中心性和凝聚子群5箇角度進行分析.結果作者閤著網絡密度為0.0021,網絡中主成分節點佔所有節點總數的3.46%,點度中心性值最高的節點是林潔中,而中間中心性和接近中心性值最高的節點均為郭蘊青,1851箇作者構成44箇2-叢.結論 目前國內該領域作者閤著關繫不緊密,但在一定程度上林潔中、樑耀、李建煒、範煒、郭蘊青、劉愛民等作者屬于該領域的覈心成員或意見領袖.從整體角度來看,該網絡目前尚未形成明顯的小糰體現象,組織結構比較鬆散、孤立.
목적운용사회망락분석법탐토국내국제질병분류영역작자합저현상.방법이용UCINET연건종망락밀도、점도중심성、중간중심성、접근중심성화응취자군5개각도진행분석.결과작자합저망락밀도위0.0021,망락중주성분절점점소유절점총수적3.46%,점도중심성치최고적절점시림길중,이중간중심성화접근중심성치최고적절점균위곽온청,1851개작자구성44개2-총.결론 목전국내해영역작자합저관계불긴밀,단재일정정도상림길중、량요、리건위、범위、곽온청、류애민등작자속우해영역적핵심성원혹의견령수.종정체각도래간,해망락목전상미형성명현적소단체현상,조직결구비교송산、고립.
Objective The purpose of this article is to analyze the domestic situation of co-authorship in the field of international classification of diseases using Social Network Analysis.Methods Using UCINET to do this research from the following five perspectives,namely density,degree centrality,betweenness centrality,closeness and subgroup analysis.Results The density of co-authoring network is 0.0021.The number of nodes which made up the main component accounts for 3.46% of the total nodes.Lin Jie-zhong possesses the highest value of degree centrality,and Guo Yun-qing's value of betweenness centrality and closeness is the highest.Forty-four 2-plexes are found in all authors.Conclusions Currently,the co-authorship is not close,but to a certain extent,the authors liked Lin Jie-zhong,Liang Yao,Li Jian-wei,Fan Wei,Guo Yun-qing,Liu Ai-min and so on constitute the core members or leaders.From the overall point of view,the authors in this field have not yet formed a subgroup phenomenon obviously.The structure of this co-authoring network is loose and isolated.