中华医学美学美容杂志
中華醫學美學美容雜誌
중화의학미학미용잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AESTHETICS AND COSMETOLOGY
2012年
6期
404-406
,共3页
何惟薇%徐慧青%朱海泳%陈洁%顾立国%孙文彪%胡康容
何惟薇%徐慧青%硃海泳%陳潔%顧立國%孫文彪%鬍康容
하유미%서혜청%주해영%진길%고입국%손문표%호강용
痤疮%半导体激光
痤瘡%半導體激光
좌창%반도체격광
Acne%Diode laser
目的 探索波长650、810 nm的半导体激光治疗中、重度痤疮的临床疗效及安全性.方法 将87例面部痤疮患者,分为激光治疗组(A组)和药物治疗组(B组).A组:用波长650、810 nm半导体激光连续输出功率400~450 mW,非接触性照射(距离为2~3 cm),10 min/次,1次/d,共2周;然后,隔日1次,共2周,16次;B组:口服罗红霉素胶囊0.15g,2次/d,共4周,配合口服维生素B6,外用绿药膏治疗.治疗前及治疗后每周进行临床疗效观察,数码拍照以备对比分析,并在治疗结束后,随访4个月.同时,记录治疗过程中出现的不良反应.结果 A组和B组疗效在治疗后2周(65.0%比42.6%,P>0.05)、4周(92.5%比76.5%,P>0.05)差异无统计学意义,但A组复发率显著低于B组,差异有统计学意义(30.0%比61.7%,P<0.01).结论 与药物治疗相比,半导体激光治疗中、重度痤疮可显著降低其复发率.
目的 探索波長650、810 nm的半導體激光治療中、重度痤瘡的臨床療效及安全性.方法 將87例麵部痤瘡患者,分為激光治療組(A組)和藥物治療組(B組).A組:用波長650、810 nm半導體激光連續輸齣功率400~450 mW,非接觸性照射(距離為2~3 cm),10 min/次,1次/d,共2週;然後,隔日1次,共2週,16次;B組:口服囉紅黴素膠囊0.15g,2次/d,共4週,配閤口服維生素B6,外用綠藥膏治療.治療前及治療後每週進行臨床療效觀察,數碼拍照以備對比分析,併在治療結束後,隨訪4箇月.同時,記錄治療過程中齣現的不良反應.結果 A組和B組療效在治療後2週(65.0%比42.6%,P>0.05)、4週(92.5%比76.5%,P>0.05)差異無統計學意義,但A組複髮率顯著低于B組,差異有統計學意義(30.0%比61.7%,P<0.01).結論 與藥物治療相比,半導體激光治療中、重度痤瘡可顯著降低其複髮率.
목적 탐색파장650、810 nm적반도체격광치료중、중도좌창적림상료효급안전성.방법 장87례면부좌창환자,분위격광치료조(A조)화약물치료조(B조).A조:용파장650、810 nm반도체격광련속수출공솔400~450 mW,비접촉성조사(거리위2~3 cm),10 min/차,1차/d,공2주;연후,격일1차,공2주,16차;B조:구복라홍매소효낭0.15g,2차/d,공4주,배합구복유생소B6,외용록약고치료.치료전급치료후매주진행림상료효관찰,수마박조이비대비분석,병재치료결속후,수방4개월.동시,기록치료과정중출현적불량반응.결과 A조화B조료효재치료후2주(65.0%비42.6%,P>0.05)、4주(92.5%비76.5%,P>0.05)차이무통계학의의,단A조복발솔현저저우B조,차이유통계학의의(30.0%비61.7%,P<0.01).결론 여약물치료상비,반도체격광치료중、중도좌창가현저강저기복발솔.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 650 nm,810 nm diode laser on the treatment of moderate to severe acne.Methods A total of 87 patients with moderate to severe acne were divided into diode laser group (group A) and medication group (group B).In group A,the patients were irradiated with 650,810 nm diode laser at the fluence of 400-450 mW distance of 2-3 cm.In group B,the patients were treated with roxithromycin combined with vitamin B6 and gel lincomycini.Clinical follow-up was performed every week for 4 months.All the adverse effects were recorded.Results There was no significantly statistical difference in the cure rate between the two groups (group A versus group B at 2 weeks:65.0 % versus 42.6 %,P>0.05; at 4 weeks:92.5 % versus 76.5 %,P>0.05).However,the recurrence rate of group A was much lower than that of group B (30.0 % versus 61.7 %,P<0.01).There were no severe adverse effects in both groups during the period of the follow-up.Conclusions Compared to the medication,650,810 nm diode laser appears to be associated with lower recurrence rate in the treatment of moderate to severe acne.