CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨2012版病案首页的治疗质量的评价方法.方法选取我院2012版病案首页中入院途径及离院方式的出院患者信息,运用列联表法进行评价.结果差异性检验结果表明不同途径入院的离院方式间的差异具有统计学意义(x2=856.55,P＜0.05).相关性分析表明不同途径入院的患者与离院方式之间的Spearman相关系数为-0.11(P＜0.05).在此基础上得到全院治疗质量的得分为4.95.结论评价体系的建立表明2012版病案首页下治疗质量的指标设置更为科学,评价结果也更加客观.
목적 탐토2012판병안수혈적치료질량적평개방법.방법 선취아원2012판병안수혈중입원도경급리원방식적출원환자신식,운용렬련표법진행평개.결과 차이성검험결과표명불동도경입원적리원방식간적차이구유통계학의의(x2=856.55,P＜0.05).상관성분석표명불동도경입원적환자여리원방식지간적Spearman상관계수위-0.11(P＜0.05).재차기출상득도전원치료질량적득분위4.95.결론 평개체계적건립표명2012판병안수혈하치료질량적지표설치경위과학,평개결과야경가객관.
Objective To explore an evaluation method of quality of care using the 2012 medical record front page.Methods The admission pathway and discharge method information of inpatients discharge recorded in the medical record front pages of the hospital were chosen and evaluated with contingency tables.Results The outcomes indicated that the differences between discharge methods of those admitted through different pathways are significant statistically (x2 =856.55,P ＜ 0.05).The correlation analysis showed that the coefficient of Spearman correlation between the inpatients admitted through different pathways and their discharge methods was -0.11 (P＜0.05).Calculated as such,the score of quality of care was 4.95 for the hospital as a whole.Conclusion The establishment of this evaluation system showed that the indicators set for quality of care using the 2012 medical record front page are scientific,and the results are more objective.