中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2013年
2期
144-147
,共4页
林介军%吴伟%蒋晓芬%金小军%卢立杰%鲍洛文
林介軍%吳偉%蔣曉芬%金小軍%盧立傑%鮑洛文
림개군%오위%장효분%금소군%로립걸%포락문
癌,肝细胞%导管消融术%栓塞,治疗性%治疗结果%预后
癌,肝細胞%導管消融術%栓塞,治療性%治療結果%預後
암,간세포%도관소융술%전새,치료성%치료결과%예후
Carcinoma,hepatocellular%Catheter ablation%Embolization,therapeutic%Treatment outcome%Prognosis
目的 探讨经皮射频消融(RFA)联合经皮肝动脉插管化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效.方法 将确诊的62例原发性肝癌患者(肿瘤最大直径3 ~5 cm)随机分为RFA联合TACE组(联合组)和单纯RFA组(射频组).其中联合组患者先行TACE治疗,1周后再行RFA治疗;射频组患者直接行RFA治疗.随访时间9~ 39个月,采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,Logrank检验比较生存曲线差异.结果 联合组患者的1、2、3年总生存率分别为90.6%、72.0%和53.1%,单纯射频组患者的1、2、3年总生存率分别为86.6%、63.3%和40.0%,差异无统计学意义(P =0.176).联合组患者的1、2、3年无瘤生存率分别为75.0%、50.0%和34.3%,单纯射频组患者的1、2、3年无瘤生存率分别为63.3%、33.3%、16.7%,差异有统计学意义(P =0.027).联合组患者的1、2、3年局部肿瘤进展率分别为12.5%、18.8%和18.8%,单纯射频组患者的1、2、3年局部肿瘤进展率分别为16.7%、30.0%和36.6%,差异有统计学意义(P =0.047).结论 对于最大直径为3~5 cm的原发性肝癌患者,RFA联合TACE的疗效优于单纯RFA.
目的 探討經皮射頻消融(RFA)聯閤經皮肝動脈插管化療栓塞(TACE)治療原髮性肝癌的臨床療效.方法 將確診的62例原髮性肝癌患者(腫瘤最大直徑3 ~5 cm)隨機分為RFA聯閤TACE組(聯閤組)和單純RFA組(射頻組).其中聯閤組患者先行TACE治療,1週後再行RFA治療;射頻組患者直接行RFA治療.隨訪時間9~ 39箇月,採用Kaplan-Meier方法進行生存分析,Logrank檢驗比較生存麯線差異.結果 聯閤組患者的1、2、3年總生存率分彆為90.6%、72.0%和53.1%,單純射頻組患者的1、2、3年總生存率分彆為86.6%、63.3%和40.0%,差異無統計學意義(P =0.176).聯閤組患者的1、2、3年無瘤生存率分彆為75.0%、50.0%和34.3%,單純射頻組患者的1、2、3年無瘤生存率分彆為63.3%、33.3%、16.7%,差異有統計學意義(P =0.027).聯閤組患者的1、2、3年跼部腫瘤進展率分彆為12.5%、18.8%和18.8%,單純射頻組患者的1、2、3年跼部腫瘤進展率分彆為16.7%、30.0%和36.6%,差異有統計學意義(P =0.047).結論 對于最大直徑為3~5 cm的原髮性肝癌患者,RFA聯閤TACE的療效優于單純RFA.
목적 탐토경피사빈소융(RFA)연합경피간동맥삽관화료전새(TACE)치료원발성간암적림상료효.방법 장학진적62례원발성간암환자(종류최대직경3 ~5 cm)수궤분위RFA연합TACE조(연합조)화단순RFA조(사빈조).기중연합조환자선행TACE치료,1주후재행RFA치료;사빈조환자직접행RFA치료.수방시간9~ 39개월,채용Kaplan-Meier방법진행생존분석,Logrank검험비교생존곡선차이.결과 연합조환자적1、2、3년총생존솔분별위90.6%、72.0%화53.1%,단순사빈조환자적1、2、3년총생존솔분별위86.6%、63.3%화40.0%,차이무통계학의의(P =0.176).연합조환자적1、2、3년무류생존솔분별위75.0%、50.0%화34.3%,단순사빈조환자적1、2、3년무류생존솔분별위63.3%、33.3%、16.7%,차이유통계학의의(P =0.027).연합조환자적1、2、3년국부종류진전솔분별위12.5%、18.8%화18.8%,단순사빈조환자적1、2、3년국부종류진전솔분별위16.7%、30.0%화36.6%,차이유통계학의의(P =0.047).결론 대우최대직경위3~5 cm적원발성간암환자,RFA연합TACE적료효우우단순RFA.
Objective To compare the effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiofrequency ablation alone for the treatment of 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods From January 2006 to March 2010,sixty-two HCC patients were randomly treated with RFA combined with TACE (n =32) or RFA alone (n =30).This group included the patients who had Child-Pugh class A or B with three or fewer tumors,in which just one tumor size was 3-5 cm in diameter,and no evidence of extrahepatic tumor metastasis or macrovascular invasion.The follow up ranged from 9 to 39 months.Survival probabilities were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method,and differences between survival curves were evaluated with the Log rank test.Results At the end of the study,the 1-,2-and 3-year overall survival rates in the combined treatment group were 90.6%,72%,and 53.1%,respectively,and in the radiofrequency ablation alone group were 83.3%,56.75%,and 23.3%,respectively.The differences between the survival curves of the two groups were not statistically significant (P =0.176).The 1-,2-,and 3-year progress-free survival rates in the combined treatment group were 75.0%,50.0%,and 34.3%,respectively,and in the radiofrequency ablation alone group were 63.3%,33.3%,and 16.7%,respectively.The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P=0.027).The 1-,2-,and 3-year local tumor progression rates in the combined treatment group were 12.5%,18.75%,and 18.75% vs.16.7%,30%,and 36.6% in the radiofrequency ablation alone group,with a significant difference between the two groups (P =0.047).Conclusion Radiofrequency ablation plus TACE is better than radiofrequency ablation alone for the treatment of 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma.