中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2014年
1期
39-42
,共4页
郑虹%高雨农%燕鑫%高敏%高维娇
鄭虹%高雨農%燕鑫%高敏%高維嬌
정홍%고우농%연흠%고민%고유교
肿瘤,继发原发性%生殖器肿瘤,女(雌)性%静脉血栓栓塞性疾病%外科手术%预防和防护用药
腫瘤,繼髮原髮性%生殖器腫瘤,女(雌)性%靜脈血栓栓塞性疾病%外科手術%預防和防護用藥
종류,계발원발성%생식기종류,녀(자)성%정맥혈전전새성질병%외과수술%예방화방호용약
Neoplasms,second primary%Genital neoplasms,female%Venous thromboembolism%Surgical procedure,operative%Protective agents
目的 探讨妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后应用低分子肝素(LMWH)联合逐级加压弹力袜预防静脉血栓栓塞性疾病(VTE)的效果.方法 按照术后预防VTE的不同方法,将行根治性手术治疗的妇科恶性肿瘤初治患者分为2组,分别为LMWH联合弹力袜组和弹力袜组,分析2组患者预防VTE的效果.结果 LMWH联合弹力袜组患者术后VTE的发生率为0.8%,低于弹力袜组(8.1%,P=0.01).应用LMWH的患者术后未发生严重的出血并发症,而伤口裂开的发生率与未应用LMWH的患者比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄≥60岁、手术时间≥3 h和未应用LMWH是术后发生VTE的独立危险因素(均P<0.05).结论 妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后应用LMWH联合弹力袜预防VTE的效果高于单独应用弹力袜,且方便、安全.患者高龄和手术时间长是术后发生VTE的危险因素,应给予积极有效的预防措施.
目的 探討婦科噁性腫瘤患者術後應用低分子肝素(LMWH)聯閤逐級加壓彈力襪預防靜脈血栓栓塞性疾病(VTE)的效果.方法 按照術後預防VTE的不同方法,將行根治性手術治療的婦科噁性腫瘤初治患者分為2組,分彆為LMWH聯閤彈力襪組和彈力襪組,分析2組患者預防VTE的效果.結果 LMWH聯閤彈力襪組患者術後VTE的髮生率為0.8%,低于彈力襪組(8.1%,P=0.01).應用LMWH的患者術後未髮生嚴重的齣血併髮癥,而傷口裂開的髮生率與未應用LMWH的患者比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).多因素Logistic迴歸分析結果顯示,年齡≥60歲、手術時間≥3 h和未應用LMWH是術後髮生VTE的獨立危險因素(均P<0.05).結論 婦科噁性腫瘤患者術後應用LMWH聯閤彈力襪預防VTE的效果高于單獨應用彈力襪,且方便、安全.患者高齡和手術時間長是術後髮生VTE的危險因素,應給予積極有效的預防措施.
목적 탐토부과악성종류환자술후응용저분자간소(LMWH)연합축급가압탄력말예방정맥혈전전새성질병(VTE)적효과.방법 안조술후예방VTE적불동방법,장행근치성수술치료적부과악성종류초치환자분위2조,분별위LMWH연합탄력말조화탄력말조,분석2조환자예방VTE적효과.결과 LMWH연합탄력말조환자술후VTE적발생솔위0.8%,저우탄력말조(8.1%,P=0.01).응용LMWH적환자술후미발생엄중적출혈병발증,이상구렬개적발생솔여미응용LMWH적환자비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).다인소Logistic회귀분석결과현시,년령≥60세、수술시간≥3 h화미응용LMWH시술후발생VTE적독립위험인소(균P<0.05).결론 부과악성종류환자술후응용LMWH연합탄력말예방VTE적효과고우단독응용탄력말,차방편、안전.환자고령화수술시간장시술후발생VTE적위험인소,응급여적겁유효적예방조시.
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) combined with graduated compression stockings (GCS) with GCS alone as prophylactic measures for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in post-operative patients with gynecologic cancer.Methods Patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer undergoing primary major surgery between 2010 and 2011 in our institute were randomized to receive ~ + GCS or ~ as VTE prophylaxis post-operatively.Results Altogether 247 patients were enrolled.The incidence of VTE in patients treated with LMWH + GCS was significantly lower than that in patients using GCS alone (0.8% Vs.8.1%,P =0.01).There were no severe bleeding complications in the patients with prophylactic use of LMWH and the occurrence rate of wound dehiscence was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age over 60 years (P =0.015),duration of operation over 3 hours (P =0.04)and without prophylactic use of LMWH (P =0.02) were independent risk factors for VTE.Conclusions Dual prophylaxis with LMWH and GCS should be recommended for gynecologic cancer patients undergoing major surgery for its better efficacy than GCS.Prophylactic use of LMWH is safe and convenient.Patients with older age and prolonged operation time are at highest risk of developing VTE post-operatively.