中华整形外科杂志
中華整形外科雜誌
중화정형외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
2014年
3期
164-167
,共4页
卢明星%孙国文%杨旭东%王志勇%胡勤刚%唐恩溢
盧明星%孫國文%楊旭東%王誌勇%鬍勤剛%唐恩溢
로명성%손국문%양욱동%왕지용%호근강%당은일
舌缺损%修复外科手术%外科皮瓣
舌缺損%脩複外科手術%外科皮瓣
설결손%수복외과수술%외과피판
Tongue defect%Reconstructive surgical procedures%Surgical flaps
目的 探讨薄型股前外侧皮瓣在舌癌术后缺损修复中的应用价值.方法 回顾分析2009年12月至2011年12月应用游离薄型殷前外侧皮瓣及游离前臂皮瓣修复46例舌癌术后半舌缺损,并对比2种修复方法术后血管危象发生率、舌体外形恢复满意程度、语言及吞咽功能恢复状况等.结果 46例舌癌患者采取了薄型股前外侧皮瓣或前臂皮瓣修复,其中12例薄型股前外侧皮瓣全部成活,1例发生血管危像,经抢救后皮瓣成活;34例前臂皮瓣中33例成活,3例发生血管危像,抢救后2例皮瓣成活,1例发生坏死.对比2种舌癌手术修复方法表明:2种方法术后舌体外形基本满意,口腔功能基本恢复,语言及吞咽功能亦无明显差别.结论 薄型股前外侧皮瓣修复舌癌术后舌体缺损效果佳、外形好,功能恢复与前臂皮瓣修复效果无明显区别,且对供区影响小,组织量丰富、供区隐蔽,可以作为修复舌癌术后缺损的首选方法.
目的 探討薄型股前外側皮瓣在舌癌術後缺損脩複中的應用價值.方法 迴顧分析2009年12月至2011年12月應用遊離薄型慇前外側皮瓣及遊離前臂皮瓣脩複46例舌癌術後半舌缺損,併對比2種脩複方法術後血管危象髮生率、舌體外形恢複滿意程度、語言及吞嚥功能恢複狀況等.結果 46例舌癌患者採取瞭薄型股前外側皮瓣或前臂皮瓣脩複,其中12例薄型股前外側皮瓣全部成活,1例髮生血管危像,經搶救後皮瓣成活;34例前臂皮瓣中33例成活,3例髮生血管危像,搶救後2例皮瓣成活,1例髮生壞死.對比2種舌癌手術脩複方法錶明:2種方法術後舌體外形基本滿意,口腔功能基本恢複,語言及吞嚥功能亦無明顯差彆.結論 薄型股前外側皮瓣脩複舌癌術後舌體缺損效果佳、外形好,功能恢複與前臂皮瓣脩複效果無明顯區彆,且對供區影響小,組織量豐富、供區隱蔽,可以作為脩複舌癌術後缺損的首選方法.
목적 탐토박형고전외측피판재설암술후결손수복중적응용개치.방법 회고분석2009년12월지2011년12월응용유리박형은전외측피판급유리전비피판수복46례설암술후반설결손,병대비2충수복방법술후혈관위상발생솔、설체외형회복만의정도、어언급탄인공능회복상황등.결과 46례설암환자채취료박형고전외측피판혹전비피판수복,기중12례박형고전외측피판전부성활,1례발생혈관위상,경창구후피판성활;34례전비피판중33례성활,3례발생혈관위상,창구후2례피판성활,1례발생배사.대비2충설암수술수복방법표명:2충방법술후설체외형기본만의,구강공능기본회복,어언급탄인공능역무명현차별.결론 박형고전외측피판수복설암술후설체결손효과가、외형호,공능회복여전비피판수복효과무명현구별,차대공구영향소,조직량봉부、공구은폐,가이작위수복설암술후결손적수선방법.
Objective To compare the thin anterolateral flap with forearm flap in tongue defect repairing,and to introduce our methods and experiences in the tongue reconstruction with the thin anterolateral flap.Methods The clinicopathologic data of 46 cases with tongue carcinoma were obtained from School of Stomatology,Nanjing University Medical Center,Nanjing University from December 2009 to December 2011.To compare two methods of incidence of vascular crisis,tongue shape,language and swallowing functional recovery.Results 46 patients with tongue carcinoma were performed the tongue reconstruction in 12 month,which 12 cases were used the thin anterolateral flap and 34 cases were used the forearm flap.In the thin anterolateral flap group,All cases were succeeded.1 case occurs vascular crisis.In the forearm flap group,33 cases were succeeded,and 1 case occurs necrosis.3 cases occurs vascular crisis.The results of comparing two methods showed that:no obvious differences in the tongue shape,and no obvious differences in the function of language and swallowing.Conclusions There no obvious differences in the reconstruction of tongue defect between the thin anterolateral flap and the forearm flap.The thin anterolateral flap have some advantages:little influence is on the donor site,the flap extent is abundant,the donor site is not spectacular.The thin anterolateral flap should be piror method for the tongue defect repairing.