中国实用医刊
中國實用醫刊
중국실용의간
CENTRAL PLAINS MEDICAL JOURNAL
2013年
24期
46-47
,共2页
高血压%脑出血%微创%引流
高血壓%腦齣血%微創%引流
고혈압%뇌출혈%미창%인류
Hypertension%Cerebral hemorrhage%Minimally invasion%Drainage
目的 探究微创钻孔引流术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效.方法 选取167例高血压脑出血患者的临床资料,按治疗方法分为两组,对照组采用常规开颅术进行治疗,观察组采用微创钻孔引流术进行治疗.比较两组患者的手术时间、手术失血量、血肿清除率及术后Glasgow预后评分及临床疗效.结果 两组患者的手术时间、手术失血量、血肿清除率及术后Glasgow预后评分组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组患者治疗总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 微创钻孔引流术安全性高,效果显著,值得临床推广.
目的 探究微創鑽孔引流術治療高血壓腦齣血的療效.方法 選取167例高血壓腦齣血患者的臨床資料,按治療方法分為兩組,對照組採用常規開顱術進行治療,觀察組採用微創鑽孔引流術進行治療.比較兩組患者的手術時間、手術失血量、血腫清除率及術後Glasgow預後評分及臨床療效.結果 兩組患者的手術時間、手術失血量、血腫清除率及術後Glasgow預後評分組間比較差異均有統計學意義(P＜0.05);觀察組患者治療總有效率顯著高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).結論 微創鑽孔引流術安全性高,效果顯著,值得臨床推廣.
목적 탐구미창찬공인류술치료고혈압뇌출혈적료효.방법 선취167례고혈압뇌출혈환자적림상자료,안치료방법분위량조,대조조채용상규개로술진행치료,관찰조채용미창찬공인류술진행치료.비교량조환자적수술시간、수술실혈량、혈종청제솔급술후Glasgow예후평분급림상료효.결과 량조환자적수술시간、수술실혈량、혈종청제솔급술후Glasgow예후평분조간비교차이균유통계학의의(P＜0.05);관찰조환자치료총유효솔현저고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 미창찬공인류술안전성고,효과현저,치득림상추엄.
Objective To investigate the curative effect of minimally invasive drilling drainage on hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Methods The clinical data of 167 patients with hypertension cerebral hemorrhage were selected,according to the treatment methods,the patients were divided into two groups,patients in control group were given conventional open-brain surgery treatment,and the patients in observation group were treated by minimally invasive drilling drainage.The surgical time,surgical blood loss,hematoma clearance rate and postoperative Glasgow outcome score (GOS) and the clinical curative effect were compared between the two groups.Results There were significant differences in surgical time,surgical blood loss,postoperative hematoma clearance and Glasgow outcome score (GOS) between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05) ; the total effective rate of observation group was higher than that of control group,there was significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Minimally invasive drilling drainage has high safety and good effect,so it is worthy to be popularized in clinics.
