解放军医学院学报
解放軍醫學院學報
해방군의학원학보
Academic Journal of Chinese Pla Medical School
2013年
4期
360-362
,共3页
陈国良%单墨水%路桂军%高谦%崔红
陳國良%單墨水%路桂軍%高謙%崔紅
진국량%단묵수%로계군%고겸%최홍
慢性疼痛%注意偏向%情绪斯特鲁普%焦虑%对照研究
慢性疼痛%註意偏嚮%情緒斯特魯普%焦慮%對照研究
만성동통%주의편향%정서사특로보%초필%대조연구
chronic pain%attention bias%emotional stroop%anxiety%control study
目的探讨慢性疼痛患者对痛觉相关信息是否存在注意偏向.方法采用E-prime 2.0程序编写情绪Stroop范式,记录并比较慢性疼痛患者及健康对照组(各20例)对3类词汇(包括中性、痛觉、威胁)颜色命名的反应时及正确率,考察慢性疼痛患者的注意偏向.结果慢性疼痛患者对痛觉相关词汇的颜色命名反应时长于中性词汇[(786.02±18.15) ms vs (774.73±17.34) ms,P<0.05],威胁相关词汇反应时长于中性词汇[(792.35±17.72) ms vs (774.73±17.34) ms,P<0.05];健康对照组威胁相关词汇反应时长于中性词汇[(779.75±20.99) ms vs (764.74±20.53) ms,P<0.05],对痛觉相关词汇的颜色命名反应时与中性词汇无统计学差异.重复测量方差分析发现存在刺激类别的主效应(F=18.86,P<0.01),以及组别和刺激类别的交互效应(F=4.48,P<0.05).慢性疼痛患者痛觉相关词汇注意偏向与疼痛持续时间无关,与患者焦虑水平显著相关(r=0.471,P<0.05).结论慢性疼痛患者存在对痛觉相关信息的注意偏向,并且与焦虑水平有密切关系.
目的探討慢性疼痛患者對痛覺相關信息是否存在註意偏嚮.方法採用E-prime 2.0程序編寫情緒Stroop範式,記錄併比較慢性疼痛患者及健康對照組(各20例)對3類詞彙(包括中性、痛覺、威脅)顏色命名的反應時及正確率,攷察慢性疼痛患者的註意偏嚮.結果慢性疼痛患者對痛覺相關詞彙的顏色命名反應時長于中性詞彙[(786.02±18.15) ms vs (774.73±17.34) ms,P<0.05],威脅相關詞彙反應時長于中性詞彙[(792.35±17.72) ms vs (774.73±17.34) ms,P<0.05];健康對照組威脅相關詞彙反應時長于中性詞彙[(779.75±20.99) ms vs (764.74±20.53) ms,P<0.05],對痛覺相關詞彙的顏色命名反應時與中性詞彙無統計學差異.重複測量方差分析髮現存在刺激類彆的主效應(F=18.86,P<0.01),以及組彆和刺激類彆的交互效應(F=4.48,P<0.05).慢性疼痛患者痛覺相關詞彙註意偏嚮與疼痛持續時間無關,與患者焦慮水平顯著相關(r=0.471,P<0.05).結論慢性疼痛患者存在對痛覺相關信息的註意偏嚮,併且與焦慮水平有密切關繫.
목적탐토만성동통환자대통각상관신식시부존재주의편향.방법채용E-prime 2.0정서편사정서Stroop범식,기록병비교만성동통환자급건강대조조(각20례)대3류사회(포괄중성、통각、위협)안색명명적반응시급정학솔,고찰만성동통환자적주의편향.결과만성동통환자대통각상관사회적안색명명반응시장우중성사회[(786.02±18.15) ms vs (774.73±17.34) ms,P<0.05],위협상관사회반응시장우중성사회[(792.35±17.72) ms vs (774.73±17.34) ms,P<0.05];건강대조조위협상관사회반응시장우중성사회[(779.75±20.99) ms vs (764.74±20.53) ms,P<0.05],대통각상관사회적안색명명반응시여중성사회무통계학차이.중복측량방차분석발현존재자격유별적주효응(F=18.86,P<0.01),이급조별화자격유별적교호효응(F=4.48,P<0.05).만성동통환자통각상관사회주의편향여동통지속시간무관,여환자초필수평현저상관(r=0.471,P<0.05).결론만성동통환자존재대통각상관신식적주의편향,병차여초필수평유밀절관계.
Objective To study the attention biases to pain-related information in chronic pain patients. Methods Attention biases in 20 chronic pain patients and 20 healthy controls to pain-related words were recorded with E-prime 2.0 program, Stroop task. Results The reaction time (RT) to pain-related words and threaten words was longer than to neutral words in chronic pain patients (786.02±18.15 ms vs 774.73 ±17.34 ms, 792.35±17.72 ms vs 774.73±17.34 ms, P<0.05). The RT to threaten-related words was longer than to neutral words in healthy controls (779.75±20.99 ms vs 764.74±20.53 ms, P<0.05) whereas no significant difference was found in pain-related words and neutral words. Variance analysis showed a dominant effect of stimulation types (F=18.86, P<0.01) and an interactive effect between group types and stimulation types (F=4.48,P<0.05). Pain-related words were not related with pain-lasting time but with anxiety in chronic pain patients with attention biases(r=0.471, P<0.05). Conclusion Chronic pain patients suffer attention biases to pain-related information, which is significantly related to their anxiety.