食品研究与开发
食品研究與開髮
식품연구여개발
FOOD RESEARCH AND CEVELOPMENT
2013年
6期
89-92
,共4页
陈玲%汪善良%李桂华%罗晓琴%刘琳%崔彦虎%何方洋*
陳玲%汪善良%李桂華%囉曉琴%劉琳%崔彥虎%何方洋*
진령%왕선량%리계화%라효금%류림%최언호%하방양*
酶联免疫法%LC-MS/MS法%鸡肉%呋喃它酮代谢物
酶聯免疫法%LC-MS/MS法%鷄肉%呋喃它酮代謝物
매련면역법%LC-MS/MS법%계육%부남타동대사물
ELISA%LC-MS/MS%chicken meat%AMOZ
运用酶联免疫法和LC-MS/MS法检测鸡肉中呋喃它酮代谢物的残留,对两种方法的灵敏度、准确度、重现性等参数进行了比较.结果显示,酶联免疫法和LC-MS/MS法的检测限可以达到0.1μg/kg,对鸡肉样品分别添加0.2、0.4、0.8μg/kg三个浓度水平的呋喃它酮代谢物时,酶联免疫法平均回收率为75.0%~94.6%,变异系数为7.9%~14.3%;LC-MS/MS法的平均回收率为89.5%~92.3%,变异系数为8.0%~10.3%,两种检测方法对阳性样品的检测结果一致.酶联免疫法可以作为初筛方法进行呋喃它酮代谢物的快速筛选,LC-MS/MS法适用于对筛选样品的确证和精确定量.
運用酶聯免疫法和LC-MS/MS法檢測鷄肉中呋喃它酮代謝物的殘留,對兩種方法的靈敏度、準確度、重現性等參數進行瞭比較.結果顯示,酶聯免疫法和LC-MS/MS法的檢測限可以達到0.1μg/kg,對鷄肉樣品分彆添加0.2、0.4、0.8μg/kg三箇濃度水平的呋喃它酮代謝物時,酶聯免疫法平均迴收率為75.0%~94.6%,變異繫數為7.9%~14.3%;LC-MS/MS法的平均迴收率為89.5%~92.3%,變異繫數為8.0%~10.3%,兩種檢測方法對暘性樣品的檢測結果一緻.酶聯免疫法可以作為初篩方法進行呋喃它酮代謝物的快速篩選,LC-MS/MS法適用于對篩選樣品的確證和精確定量.
운용매련면역법화LC-MS/MS법검측계육중부남타동대사물적잔류,대량충방법적령민도、준학도、중현성등삼수진행료비교.결과현시,매련면역법화LC-MS/MS법적검측한가이체도0.1μg/kg,대계육양품분별첨가0.2、0.4、0.8μg/kg삼개농도수평적부남타동대사물시,매련면역법평균회수솔위75.0%~94.6%,변이계수위7.9%~14.3%;LC-MS/MS법적평균회수솔위89.5%~92.3%,변이계수위8.0%~10.3%,량충검측방법대양성양품적검측결과일치.매련면역법가이작위초사방법진행부남타동대사물적쾌속사선,LC-MS/MS법괄용우대사선양품적학증화정학정량.
@@@@ELISAandLC-MS/MSfortheanalysisoffuraltadonemetabolite (AMOZ)residuesinchicken meat were studied. The sensibility, accuracy and repeatability of ELISA method were compared to those of LC-MS/MS method. The detection limit of ELISA and LC-MS/MS method could reach to 0.1μg/kg respectively. When the samples were spiked with 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8μg/kg of AMOZ,the average recovery rates of ELISA were 75.0%-94.6%, the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 7.9%-14.3%. And the average recovery rates of LC-MS/MS were 89.5%-92.3%, while the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 8.0%-10. 3%. The results were basically the same to the positive sample.TheresultsshowedthatELISAwasarapidandexactmethodwithgood reproducibility suitable for the screen ofAMOZpositivesamples, LC-MS/MSwassensitiveandsuitablefordeterminationofpositivesamples.