中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2013年
11期
7-9
,共3页
魏宏强%康瑞%李爱玲%赵秀娟
魏宏彊%康瑞%李愛玲%趙秀娟
위굉강%강서%리애령%조수연
阿立哌唑%氟伏沙明%强迫思维%强迫行为
阿立哌唑%氟伏沙明%彊迫思維%彊迫行為
아립고서%불복사명%강박사유%강박행위
Aripiprazole%Fluvoxamine%Obsession%Compulsion
目的:探讨阿立哌唑辅助氟伏沙明治疗强迫障碍的临床疗效及安全性.方法:将54例强迫障碍患者随机分为两组(各27例):阿立哌唑(2.5~10 mg/d)辅助氟伏沙明(250~300 mg/d)组(研究组)、氟伏沙明(250~300 mg/d)组(对照组),治疗观察期均为8周.两组患者于基线及治疗2、4、6、8周末分别评定Yale-Brown强迫量表(Y-BOCS),并采用副反应量表(TESS)评定治疗期间的不良反应.结果:研究组、对照组分别脱落1例、2例.研究组的强迫思维和强迫行为评分在基线及2、4、6、8周末时点间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2周末时,两组间的强迫思维评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而强迫行为评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);4周末时,两组间的强迫行为评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);8周末时,两组间强迫症状有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而不良反应发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:阿立哌唑辅助氟伏沙明可有效、持续地改善强迫障碍患者的强迫症状,且不良反应发生率与单一氟伏沙明治疗相当.
目的:探討阿立哌唑輔助氟伏沙明治療彊迫障礙的臨床療效及安全性.方法:將54例彊迫障礙患者隨機分為兩組(各27例):阿立哌唑(2.5~10 mg/d)輔助氟伏沙明(250~300 mg/d)組(研究組)、氟伏沙明(250~300 mg/d)組(對照組),治療觀察期均為8週.兩組患者于基線及治療2、4、6、8週末分彆評定Yale-Brown彊迫量錶(Y-BOCS),併採用副反應量錶(TESS)評定治療期間的不良反應.結果:研究組、對照組分彆脫落1例、2例.研究組的彊迫思維和彊迫行為評分在基線及2、4、6、8週末時點間比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);2週末時,兩組間的彊迫思維評分比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而彊迫行為評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);4週末時,兩組間的彊迫行為評分比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);8週末時,兩組間彊迫癥狀有效率比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而不良反應髮生率比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論:阿立哌唑輔助氟伏沙明可有效、持續地改善彊迫障礙患者的彊迫癥狀,且不良反應髮生率與單一氟伏沙明治療相噹.
목적:탐토아립고서보조불복사명치료강박장애적림상료효급안전성.방법:장54례강박장애환자수궤분위량조(각27례):아립고서(2.5~10 mg/d)보조불복사명(250~300 mg/d)조(연구조)、불복사명(250~300 mg/d)조(대조조),치료관찰기균위8주.량조환자우기선급치료2、4、6、8주말분별평정Yale-Brown강박량표(Y-BOCS),병채용부반응량표(TESS)평정치료기간적불량반응.결과:연구조、대조조분별탈락1례、2례.연구조적강박사유화강박행위평분재기선급2、4、6、8주말시점간비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);2주말시,량조간적강박사유평분비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이강박행위평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);4주말시,량조간적강박행위평분비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);8주말시,량조간강박증상유효솔비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이불량반응발생솔비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:아립고서보조불복사명가유효、지속지개선강박장애환자적강박증상,차불량반응발생솔여단일불복사명치료상당.
@@@@Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine and aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorders patients.Method:Total 54 obsessive-compulsive disorders patients were randomly divided into two groups:Fluvoxamine(250-300 mg/d)auxiliaried by aripiprazole(2.5-10 mg/d)group(study group)and fluvoxamine(250-300 mg/d)group(contral group),27 for each. Each group had a 8-week treatment.The efficacy were assessed and analyzed by Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale(Y-BOCS) at baseline and at week 2,4,6 and 8. The side effects were assessed by Treatment Emergent Syptom Scale(TESS)during the treatment. Result:Study group and contral group had 1,2 case being off respectively. The obsession and compulsion scores of study group had all statistical difference at baseline and week 2,4 ,6,8 each other(P<0.05). At week 2,in both groups,the obsession scores had statistical difference(P<0.05),while the compulsion scores had no statistical difference(P>0.05). At week 4,in both groups,the compulsion scores had statistical difference(P<0.05). At week 8,the efficient of compulsive symptoms scores of two groups had statistical difference(P<0.05),while the rates of side effects had all no statistical difference (P>0.05). Conclusion:Fluvoxamine and aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy can effectively continue to improve the compulsive symptoms in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorders patients,the rate of side effects is similar to that of simple fluvoxamine therapy.