中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2013年
11期
25-26
,共2页
江勇%付印强%王金宝%罗小春
江勇%付印彊%王金寶%囉小春
강용%부인강%왕금보%라소춘
急性呼吸窘迫综合征%气管插管%有创机械通气%无创正压通气
急性呼吸窘迫綜閤徵%氣管插管%有創機械通氣%無創正壓通氣
급성호흡군박종합정%기관삽관%유창궤계통기%무창정압통기
Acute respiratory distress syndrome%Intubation%Invasive mechanical ventilation%Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
目的:探讨无创正压通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中应用的临床效果.方法:选择本院2009年2月-2012年1月收治的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者84例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为两组,对照组40例采用气管插管有创机械通气治疗,观察组44例采用无创正压通气治疗,对两组的治疗效果进行比较分析.结果:观察组总有效率为95.5%,对照组总有效率为92.5%,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后观察组PaO2、SpO2显著高于对照组,PaCO2显著低于对照组,两组比较,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为2.3%,明显低于对照组的17.5%,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:无创正压通气在急性呼吸窘迫症中应用的临床效果满意,能明显改善患者的呼吸状况,且安全性好,是临床首选的治疗方法.
目的:探討無創正壓通氣在急性呼吸窘迫綜閤徵中應用的臨床效果.方法:選擇本院2009年2月-2012年1月收治的急性呼吸窘迫綜閤徵患者84例作為研究對象,按照隨機數字錶法分為兩組,對照組40例採用氣管插管有創機械通氣治療,觀察組44例採用無創正壓通氣治療,對兩組的治療效果進行比較分析.結果:觀察組總有效率為95.5%,對照組總有效率為92.5%,組間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);治療後觀察組PaO2、SpO2顯著高于對照組,PaCO2顯著低于對照組,兩組比較,組間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組不良反應髮生率為2.3%,明顯低于對照組的17.5%,組間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論:無創正壓通氣在急性呼吸窘迫癥中應用的臨床效果滿意,能明顯改善患者的呼吸狀況,且安全性好,是臨床首選的治療方法.
목적:탐토무창정압통기재급성호흡군박종합정중응용적림상효과.방법:선택본원2009년2월-2012년1월수치적급성호흡군박종합정환자84례작위연구대상,안조수궤수자표법분위량조,대조조40례채용기관삽관유창궤계통기치료,관찰조44례채용무창정압통기치료,대량조적치료효과진행비교분석.결과:관찰조총유효솔위95.5%,대조조총유효솔위92.5%,조간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);치료후관찰조PaO2、SpO2현저고우대조조,PaCO2현저저우대조조,량조비교,조간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조불량반응발생솔위2.3%,명현저우대조조적17.5%,조간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:무창정압통기재급성호흡군박증중응용적림상효과만의,능명현개선환자적호흡상황,차안전성호,시림상수선적치료방법.
@@@@Objective:To investigate the clinical effect for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the application of acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). Method:84 cases of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in our hospital from February 2009 to January 2012 were chosen as the research object. According to the random number table,they were divided into two groups,the control group of 40 cases was taken with tracheal intubation invasive mechanical ventilation treatment,and the observation group of 44 cases was treated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation treatment. The clinical effect for the two groups was taken for comparative analysis. Result:The total effective rate of the control group was 95.5%,the total effective rate was 92.5%. There was no significant difference(P>0.05)between the two groups. The PaO2,SpO2 were significantly higher than the control group after treatment,PaCO2 was significantly lower than the control group. Compared between groups,there were significant differences (P<0.05). The adverse reactions was 2.3%in the observation group,significantly lower than the 17.5%of the control group,the group had significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion:The clinical effect of the application for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)is satisfied,and can significantly improve the patient’s respiratory status and security. It is the clinical preferred treatment.