CAJ | 학술논문

对音乐作品专有录音权的限制旨在防止行业垄断,降低交易成本.国外主要采取法定许可或强制许可模式.《著作权法》修改草案第一稿第46条变我国原有的“准法定许可”为“完全法定许可”,具有进步性.但其在法定许可效力范围、缓冲期、付酬标准、著作权集体管理组织权限等问题上未给予明确规定,引发了音乐界和学术界的激烈讨论.第二稿删除了第46条,取消了音乐作品的法定许可录音制度.但回避态度不是法治之进步,立法应在调查研究我国音乐产业实际发展情况的基础上制定出合理可行法定许可制度,以平衡著作权人、首次录音制作者和后续录音制作者的利益.
대음악작품전유록음권적한제지재방지행업롱단,강저교역성본.국외주요채취법정허가혹강제허가모식.《저작권법》수개초안제일고제46조변아국원유적“준법정허가”위“완전법정허가”,구유진보성.단기재법정허가효력범위、완충기、부수표준、저작권집체관리조직권한등문제상미급여명학규정,인발료음악계화학술계적격렬토론.제이고산제료제46조,취소료음악작품적법정허가록음제도.단회피태도불시법치지진보,입법응재조사연구아국음악산업실제발전정황적기출상제정출합리가행법정허가제도,이평형저작권인、수차록음제작자화후속록음제작자적이익.
The limitation of exclusive recording of musical works aims at preventing industrial monopoly and cutting transaction costs. Laws in other countries mainly adopt statutory license or compulsory license. Article 46 of the 1st version of the amended China Copyright Law changed the original“quasi statutory license” to a“complete statutory license”, achieving a progress. Yet since the amendment did not precisely prescribe the scope of the license, the grace period, the payment standard, or the rights of collective administration organization of copyright, Article 46 triggered a fierce debate among the musical industry as well as the academia. The 2nd version deleted Article 46. However, this is an evasive attitude which is not consistent with the progress of law. The legislation shall establish a feasible system of statutory license based on investigation of the status quo of the musical industry so as to balance the interests of copyright owners, producers of first recording and producers of following recording.